Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009592
Original file (20110009592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	    27 October 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110009592 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests change of his reentry eligibility (RE) code to RE-1.

2.  The applicant states he desires to have his RE code changed to an RE-1 so he can reenter military service in the future.  He goes on to state that he is
31 years of age and he has been a law enforcement officer for 6 years.  He believes he is competent to complete service in the Reserves.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and copies of doctor’s notes dated prior to his enlistment.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) on
26 February 2009.  He was ordered to active duty for training (ADT) on
10 January 2010 and he was transferred to Fort Benning, GA to undergo basic training.

2.  The specific facts and circumstances surrounding his administrative separation are not present in the available records.  However, his official record shows that on 4 February 2010, while in a replacement holding unit, he was released from ADT under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-11, due to failing to meet medical/physical procurement standards.  He was issued a separation code of “JFW’ with a character of service of uncharacterized and was given an RE code of “NA.  He was transferred back to his TXARNG unit.

3.  On 5 February 2010, he was separated from the TXARNG and as a Reserve of the Army.  The National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) he was issued at the time shows he was separated under the provisions of National Guard Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management), paragraph 6-35c(5)(a), for failing to meet medical procurement standards of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), chapter 2 prior to entry on initial entry training (IET).  Item 26 (Reenlistment Eligibility) shows the entry "RE-3."

4.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment processing into the Regular Army, U.S. Army Reserve, and the ARNG.  Chapter 3 prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes.

	a.  RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army.  They are qualified for enlistment if all other criteria are met.

	b.  RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification is waivable.  They are ineligible for enlistment unless a waiver is granted.  A waiting period of 2 years from separation is required before a waiver may be submitted through a local recruiting office.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states item 27 (Reentry Code) does not apply to Reserve Component Soldiers being separated for other than cause.

6.  National Guard Regulation 600-200 prescribes the criteria, policies, processes, procedures and responsibilities to classify, assign, and utilize ARNG and Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) enlisted Soldiers.  Appendix F (Discharge Documentation) contains step by step directions for 

completing the NGB Form 22.  It states for Item 26 (Reenlistment Eligibility), enter the reenlistment code cited for the reason from paragraph 6-35 (Separation/Discharge from State ARNG and/or Reserve of the Army) or 6-36 (State ARNG Separations) of this regulation.  These paragraphs state that failure to meet medical procurement standards of Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 2, prior to entry on IET required an RE 3 code.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations with no indication of any violations of the applicant’s rights.

2.  Since the applicant was not separated for cause when he was released from ADT, his DD Form 214 properly reflects his RE code as “NA.”

3.  When he was separated from the ARNG, he was properly issued an RE-3 code based on the authority and reason for his separation.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show that an error or injustice exists in his case, there appears to be no basis to grant his requested relief.

4.  The Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) does not correct records solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for other programs or benefits.  The applicant is advised that if he desires to reenter military service, he should contact a local recruiter who can best advise him on his eligibility for returning to military service.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and are required to process RE code waivers.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X__  _____X___  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110009592



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110009592



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007602

    Original file (20130007602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, change of her reentry eligibility (RE) code on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) from RE-3 to a more favorable code so she could reenter military service. Her RE code was assigned based on the fact she was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards - not erroneous...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011851

    Original file (20140011851.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) as follows: * Item 7a (Place of Entry on Active Duty), from "Massillon, OH" to "Austin, TX" * Item 7b (Home of Record (HOR)), from “XXX Pershing Avenue SE, North Canton, OH, 44720" to "XXXX Balcones Club Apartments, # XXX, Austin, TX, 78750" * Item 8a (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command), from Joint Force Headquarters (-) Additional TDA GB to Joint Force Headquarters, TX * Item 19a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016019

    Original file (20110016019.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He completed 1 year, 1 month, and 1 day of creditable active service and accrued 9 days of lost time due to AWOL. On 7 December 2008, his immediate commander notified him by memorandum that he was charged with four unexcused absences from the MUTA from 6 to 7 December 2008. The applicant provides: a. his DFAS LES, dated 1 February 2010, that shows his ETS date as 23 February 2012, branch as USAR, an SGLI debt balance of $142.10 for the period December 2008 through March 2009, and a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000639

    Original file (20150000639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entrance on active duty, active duty training, or initial entry training, will be separated. A medical proceeding conducted by an EPSBD, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within 6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019466

    Original file (20090019466.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table in effect at the time established the RE code of 3 as the proper reentry code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11 for failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000692

    Original file (20150000692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He received a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 11, EPTS [existed prior to service], by reason of palpitations. The available evidence shows he was treated/seen in 2007 and 2010, for heart palpitations that occurred when he was 9 years old, and he did not mention this episode or treatments at the time of his enlistment. The evidence of record shows the proper RE code for Soldiers separated under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508725C070209

    Original file (9508725C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    A 20 November 1995 advisory opinion from an official of the office of the Chief of the Army Reserve indicates that the applicant enlisted in the Army Reserve on 29 October 1987 for the student loan repayment program, and after basic training, requested to be discharged from the Army Reserve upon his enlistment in the New Mexico ARNG as an ROTC SMP cadet. He enlisted in the ARNG on 28 September 1988. There was no record that the applicant was an unsatisfactory participant while assigned to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016208

    Original file (20120016208.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of the conscientious objector reason for his discharge from his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service). He completed 1 year and 1 month of service. Records show he was 18 years of age at the time he applied for conscientious objector status.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024537

    Original file (20110024537.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Through a remand action, dated 20 December 2011, the United States Court of Federal Claims, Washington, D.C. requests the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR): a. reconsider its 19 May 2010 decision regarding whether the applicant’s involuntary separation from the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) Program required approval of the Secretary of the Army; b. consider the applicant's evidence detailing his rehabilitative efforts that would have been considered by the Secretary of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003479

    Original file (20120003479.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military record shows he executed a 3-year enlistment in the TXARNG on 8 March 2007 for 3 years with prior USN enlisted service. (2) I am not qualified in the primary MOS for which I am enlisting, but have enlisted into an NGB or State Critical Skill MOS and agree to attend formal training and become qualified in my contracted MOS within 24 months of my date of enlistment." He acknowledges he was not MOS qualified at the time of his enlistment; therefore, the contract...