Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009518
Original file (20110009518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	8 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110009518


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the Unites States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 71H (Personnel Specialist) and his rank and pay grade as specialist five (SP5)/E-5.

2.  The applicant states he was promoted to SP5 about 2 months before he was discharged.  His job and special training at Fort Knox, KY, was in MOS 71H, not MOS 76Y (Unit Supply Specialist).  He performed many jobs while stationed in Korea, including driving trucks and jeeps.

3.  The applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 13 June 1968.  He completed training and was awarded MOS 71H.
 
3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows:

	a.  in item 22 (MOS), he was awarded MOS 71H2O on 29 November 1968 and it was designated as his secondary MOS (SMOS).  He was awarded MOS 76Y2O on 26 April 1969 and it was designated as his primary MOS (PMOS); 

	b.  in item 33 (Appointments and Reductions), he was promoted to specialist four (SP4)/E-4 effective 26 April 1969; and

	c.  in item 38 (Record of Assignments), he was assigned to the 2d Medical Battalion in Korea from 20 January 1969 through 13 February 1970.

4.  His records contain:

	a.  A DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form), dated 30 April 1969, subject:  Request for Change of PMOS, shows he requested his PMOS be changed from 71H2O to 76Y2O.  He stated he had been working in the unit supply room for 3 months and he had mastered the requirements necessary for PMOS 76Y2O through on-the-job training.  He would be working as a 76Y2O for the remainder of his tour of duty in Korea.  He had not functioned in his current PMOS since his arrival in Korea.

	b.  Comment 4 to the 30 April 1969 DA Form 2496 announced approval of his request and directed publication of necessary orders awarding the applicant PMOS 76Y2O and SMOS 71H2O with promotion to SP4.

	c.  Special Orders Number 120, Headquarters, 2d Infantry Division, dated 30 April 1969, announced the applicant's promotion to SP4 in MOS 76Y2O effective 26 April 1969.

	d.  Special Orders Number 125, Headquarters, 2d Infantry Division, dated 5 May 1969, announced his award of PMOS 76Y2O and SMOS 71H2O effective 26 April 1969.

5.  His DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty in the rank of SP4 effective 20 February 1970.  He completed 1 year, 8 months, and 8 days of total active service.  Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) shows "76Y2O Unit Supply Specialist."

6.  There is no available evidence to show he was promoted to SP5 prior to his release from active duty.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.

	a.  For items 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade), enter the grade and pay grade in which serving at the time of separation.

	b.  For item 23a (Specialty Number and Title), enter the PMOS code number and title.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was awarded PMOS 71H upon completion of formal training.

2.  The evidence of record shows his PMOS changed from 71H to 76Y at his request when he was promoted to SP4.  The regulatory guidance requires the entry of the current PMOS on the DD Form 214.

3.  There is no evidence he was promoted to SP5.

4.  Therefore, there is no basis for correction of the applicant's DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__ X____  __X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110009518



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001863

    Original file (20120001863.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Records show the applicant completed training and he was awarded MOS 11B2P. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015481

    Original file (20140015481.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He states his DD Form 214 should have an MOS of 13F since he served in that MOS during his entire 12 months of service in Vietnam. There is no evidence to show he held MOS 13F at the time of his separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013994

    Original file (20090013994.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DA Form 20 and MOS orders in his record confirms he was trained in and awarded MOS 70A upon completion of AIT at Fort Dix, in August 1969. In this case, there is no evidence supporting a conclusion a formal hearing is necessary to satisfy the interest of justice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008668

    Original file (20130008668.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 reflects he served as a supply clerk, which was the MOS for which he enlisted. His DA Form 20 shows in: * item 22 (MOS's), he was awarded MOS 76Y2O (Supply Clerk) as his primary MOS on 19 March 1968 * item 38 (Record of Assignments), he performed duties in – * MOS 76Y2O with principal duty shown as "Supply" from 23 September to 8 November 1968 * MOS 76Y3O with principal duty as an armorer from 10 November 1968 to 24 August 1969 5. The fact that his DA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080019013

    Original file (AR20080019013.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in his service personnel records to show he applied for a legal change of his last name while he served on active duty or in the U.S. Army Reserve. Hence the applicant’s 1971 DD Form 214 reflects the correct MOS in item 23a. __________XXX_______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002200

    Original file (20140002200 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his correct military occupational specialty (MOS) and that he was promoted to pay grade E-5. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded PMOS 16C2O while on active duty, and promoted to pay grade E-5 and awarded PMOS 13B4O while in the USAR. However, there are no orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded MOS 16C2O as his PMOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002162

    Original file (20120002162.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows his specialty number and title as 67H (Cargo Handler). Item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was awarded secondary MOS (SMOS) 61C on 1 June 1967 and primary MOS (PMOS) 57H (Cargo Handler) on 5 December 1967. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from item 23a of his DD Form 214 the entry "67H2O...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016567

    Original file (20130016567.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) records to show: * His active Reserve service * Promotion to Staff Sergeant (SSG)/E-6 * Change in his military occupational specialty (MOS) 2. His record contains a Promotion Recommendation and Board Report Form dated 8 August 1977 which listed his current rank as SP5 and shows he was recommended for promotion to SSG. The evidence of record shows he held no military status from 26 March 1971 to 3 October 1972 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011979

    Original file (20110011979.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. General orders awarded him the Air Medal which is not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004992

    Original file (20140004992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his correct military occupational specialty (MOS) and mailing address after separation. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in – * item 22 (MOS) – * Primary MOS (PMOS) 11E2O, Armor Crewman, 18 October 1968 (this entry is lined-thru/deleted) * PMOS 71B3O, Clerk Typist, 30 January 1969 * item 31 (Foreign Service) – he served in Vietnam from 7...