IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 25 October 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110009316
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge and change of his narrative reason for separation.
2. The applicant states he was pressured into reenlisting against his better judgment. Since his discharge, he has become a better citizen with maturity. He states that having his discharge upgraded would provide him with better opportunities for himself and his family, such as work, school, and health care. He states that he made a mistake, but he still loves his country and the military life. He regrets his mistake and carries a heavy load of guilt and shame.
3. The applicant provides no additional documentation to support his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to
timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 July 1982 for a period of
3 years. He completed basic and advanced individual training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 16R (Air Defense Artillery Short Range Gunnery Crewmember).
3. On 1 February 1983, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for wrongfully possessing marijuana.
4. On 6 July 1985, he was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. During this period of service he completed the Primary Leadership Development Course, he was awarded the Army Service Ribbon and the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), and he attained the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5. He reenlisted on 7 July 1985 for a period of 3 years.
5. On 3 October 1985, he accepted NJP under Article 15, UCMJ, for testing positive for marijuana on a mandatory unit urinalysis screening.
6. His record contains a DA Form 4126-R (Bar to Enlistment/Reenlistment Certificate), dated 7 October 1985, that shows he was barred from reenlistment after testing positive for marijuana.
7. On 9 October 1985, the applicants commander initiated elimination action on him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14, for misconduct - commission of a serious offense. The reason cited by the commander was the applicant tested positive for illegal drugs.
8. The applicant was advised by consulting counsel of the basis for the contemplated separation action. He was also advised of the impact of the discharge action. He signed a statement indicating that he was advised he was being recommended for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation
635-200, chapter 14. The applicant requested counsel, waiARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010399
The separation packet also includes statements from one officer and six noncommissioned officers, all dated on or about 15 March 1990, recommending the applicant receive an honorable discharge. On 23 May 1990, the applicant's immediate commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with paragraph 14-12(c) of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel) for misconduct citing his wrongful use of marijuana and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003384
On 17 April 1985, his immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel) for misconduct - abuse of illegal drugs. On 7 January 1986, his immediate commander initiated separation action against him in accordance with chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 for misconduct. On 5 March 1986, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005809
On 11 June 1986, the applicant was notified that he was being recommended for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14, for misconduct - pattern of misconduct. On 6 October 1986, the applicant was accordingly discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, for misconduct - pattern of misconduct. The available evidence does not show the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027955
U.S. Military Community Activity Bamberg memorandum, dated 29 April 1985, subject: Synopsis of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) Rehabilitation Activities, shows the applicant was enrolled in ADAPCP Track I on 11 January 1985. On 31 May 1985, the separation authority approved the chain of command's recommendation for discharge of the applicant and directed that he be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006874C071029
On 12 March 1986, the commander initiated separation action on the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for drug abuse rehabilitation failure. On 14 April 1986, the applicant was discharged, with a general under honorable conditions discharge, in pay grade E-2, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9 for drug abuse rehabilitation failure. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014203
He understood that if he received a discharge certificate/ character of service which is less than honorable, he could apply to the Army Discharge Review Board or the Army Board for Correction of Military Records for upgrading; however, he realizes than an action of consideration by either board did not imply that his discharge would be upgraded. On 31 January 1986, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005722C071029
Carmen Duncan | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 10 May 1985, the applicant’s commander advised him he was being considered for elimination under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14 for misconduct. On 7 June 1985, the applicant was discharged, with a general discharge, in pay grade E-5, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635- 200, chapter 14, for misconduct – drug abuse.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014392
His commander informed him he was recommending a bar to reenlistment and discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 13 or 14. A Summary of Proceedings shows the applicant's counsel objected to consideration of his 201 File (Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ)) on the grounds that Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-8 stated characterization of service should be determined solely by the current term of service, but...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015278
On 19 May 1988, the applicant's immediate commander notified her of his intent to initiate separation action against her for misconduct commission of a serious offense in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-12c. On 31 May 1988, subsequent to a review for legal sufficiency, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge, with her service characterized as under honorable conditions (general). A discharge under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017151
He was discharged from active duty on 4 October 1986 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for alcohol rehabilitation failure with an under honorable conditions (general) characterization of service. There is no indication that he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) to request an upgrade of his characterization of service within that boards 15-year statute of limitations. The evidence of record show the applicant received an LOR of marijuana use, two...