Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009233
Original file (20110009233.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  10 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110009233 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with third Oak Leaf Cluster (3rd OLC).

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the ARCOM (3rd OLC) and he desires that it be added to his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides copies of four ARCOM Certificates.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 August 1982 for a period of 4 years and training as an electronic warfare signal intelligence voice analyst.  He successfully completed his training and remained in an active duty status through a series of continuous reenlistments.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 on 1 April 1989.

3.  On 21 April 1991, he was honorably discharged due to expiration term of service (ETS).  He had served 8 years, 8 months and 12 days of active service and his DD Form 214 does not reflect any awards of the ARCOM.

4.  The applicant provides four certificates for award of the ARCOM.  The last award covered the period from 8 December 1988 to 15 April 1991 and reflects that it was issued under Permanent Orders Number 25-4.

5.  The applicant’s official records contain orders for the first three awards of the ARCOM.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the ARCOM may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the ARCOM (3rd OLC) has been noted and appears to have merit.

2.  The available evidence is sufficient to support that he was awarded the ARCOM (3rd OLC); therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show these awards at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  _____x__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the ARCOM (3rd OLC) to his DD Form 214.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      _______ _ x  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110009233



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110009233



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001393

    Original file (20090001393.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with 3rd Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) (4th Award). The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the ARCOM with 1st OLC in December 1983 and a retirement ARCOM with 3rd OLC in October 1986. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 to add the ARCOM with 3rd OLC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018116

    Original file (20090018116.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 18 July 1973, does not show award of the ARCOM w/3rd OLC. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division awarded the applicant the ARCOM on the above dates in the above orders. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Although the applicant's DA Form 20 shows award of the ARCOM w/3rd OLC there is no corroborating evidence to verify the basis for this entry.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015258

    Original file (20080015258.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued upon retirement shows, in part, he was awarded the ARCOM (Fifth OLC) and the AAM (Third OLC). The orders contained in the applicant's military records show that he was awarded three AAMs, seven ARCOMs, and one MSM. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012070

    Original file (20070012070.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 14 May 1991, be corrected to show all awards and decorations to which he is entitled. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded four awards of the ARCOM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by adding the already-awarded Good Conduct Medal,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022693

    Original file (20100022693.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his request for award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with 3rd Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) (4th Award) and its addition to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 18 July 1973. General orders dated 6 August 1970 awarded the applicant the ARCOM with "V" Device. __________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016164

    Original file (20080016164.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 January 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080016164 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant request in effect, that his record and separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with 3rd Oak Leaf Cluster (4th Award).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006955

    Original file (20100006955.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He departed Korea on 29 June 1966 for assignment to Vietnam. His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects that his SSN ended in the digit "8" and that he was awarded the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Campaign Medal * Aircraft Crewman Badge * Air Medal with 3rd OLC * Army Good Conduct Medal * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) 6. The applicant served in Korea from June 1965 to July 1966 and is therefore entitled to the KDSM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008357

    Original file (20120008357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following general orders (GO) published by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division awarded the applicant the following awards as indicated: * GO Number 7566, dated 26 August 1968, awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 24 June 1968 * GO Number 8191, dated 9 September 1968, awarded him BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 12 and 13 August 1968 * GO Number 2550, dated 5 March 1969, awarded him the BSM (2nd OLC) for meritorious service in Vietnam for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006993

    Original file (20100006993.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the following awards: * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), * three Army Achievement Medals (AAM) * Korea Defense Service Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Southwest Asia Service Medal with three bronze service stars * three Overseas Service Ribbons * Valorous Unit Award 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense Service Medal is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005278

    Original file (20140005278 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal evidence that he was awarded a fourth award of the ARCOM (i.e., ARCOM (3rd OLC)). (2) Recommendations for award of a decoration for meritorious service will not refer to acts of heroism or meritorious achievements which have been previously recognized by award of a decoration. The evidence of record shows that permanent orders awarded the applicant three awards of the ARCOM (i.e., ARCOM (2nd OLC)) and his DD Form 214...