Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008732
Original file (20110008732.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  28 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110008732 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), item 24 (Character of Service), to show the character of his service was "Honorable" instead of "Entry Level Status."

2.  He states he needs the character of his service changed to honorable so that he may receive medical services and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits.  

3.  He provides a letter from the VA. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to 
timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 10 January 1986 for 8 years.  On 15 January 1986, he was ordered to initial active duty for training (IADT).  On 18 June 1986, he was released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), paragraph 4-25, expiration term of service, and transferred to his Reserve unit.  He was credited with completing 5 months and 4 days of active service.

3.  His DD Form 214, item 24, lists his character of service as "Entry Level Status."  Item 27 (Reenlistment Code) contains the entry "NA."  

4.  Orders D-02-408494, dated 1 February 1994, shows he was honorably discharged from the USAR on the same date.

5.  He provided a letter from VA that certifies he was honorably discharged from the Army after serving from 15 January to 18 June 1986. 

6.  His record is void of any evidence and he has not provided any evidence showing he completed a period of active service of 90 days or more between 
18 June 1986 and 1 February 1994 (the date of discharge from the USAR).

7.  A member of a Reserve component who is not on active duty or who is serving under a call or order to active duty for 180 days or less begins entry-level status upon enlistment in a Reserve component.  Entry-level status of such a member of a Reserve component terminates (a) 180 days after beginning training if the Soldier is ordered to ADT for one continuous period of 180 days or more; or (b) 90 days after the beginning of the second period of ADT if the Soldier is ordered to ADT under a program that splits the training into two or more separate periods of active duty.  For the purposes of characterization of service, the Soldier's status is determined by the date of notification as to the initiation of separation proceedings.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 4, in pertinent part, provides for the separation or release from active duty upon termination of enlistment and other period of active duty or active duty for training.  Specifically, individuals of the USAR ordered to active duty who have completed less than 180 days of continuous active duty will have their service uncharacterized, even though they have completed IADT.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's record shows he entered IADT on 15 January 1986 and he was released from IADT on 18 June 1986 after completing 5 months and
4 days of active service.  In view of the fact that this was a period of service that was less than 180 days (6 months) he was appropriately issued a DD Form 214 showing he was in an entry level status of service.

2.  Orders show he was discharged from the USAR with an honorable characterization of service effective 1 February 1994.  It is presumed that in addition to these orders, he was furnished an Honorable Discharge Certificate reflecting his 8 years of service in the USAR.

3.  Eligibility for veteran's benefits (to include VA medical benefits) does not fall within the purview of the ABCMR.  The Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of making an applicant eligible for VA benefits.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110008732



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110008732



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024458

    Original file (20100024458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge status be changed from uncharacterized to honorable. The applicant requests her USAR discharge status be changed from uncharacterized to honorable because she will receive a civilian position based on an honorable discharge. However, her record contains orders that show she was discharged from the USAR on 27 May 1996 with an uncharacterized discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008127

    Original file (20100008127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Only the honorable characterization may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or active duty for training, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted [emphasis added]. (2) The evidence shows the applicant had not completed 90 days of active service after beginning Phase II (AIT). Records show the applicant was honorably...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000245

    Original file (20090000245.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 135-178 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Enlisted Administrative Separations) states that for the purposes of characterization of service, the Soldier’s status is determined by the date of notification as to the initiation of separation proceedings. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, governed the preparation of the DD Form 214 for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from the Active Army. The evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009299

    Original file (20110009299.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests upgrade of her characterization of service on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 19 July 1986, from "Entry Level Status" to "honorable." She served through two reenlistments and she was honorably discharged from active duty on 22 April 1996. When separated within the first 180 days, service is usually not characterized unless the circumstances of the separation warrant an under other than honorable conditions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026047

    Original file (20100026047.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows in items: * 4a and 4b – “PV2” and “E2” * 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) – 14 June 1993 * 12b (Separation Date This Period) – 13 August 1993 * 12c (Net Active Service This Period) – 2 months * 12d (Total Prior Active Service) – 2 months and 2 days * 12e (Total Prior Inactive Service) – 1 year, 2 months, and 15 days * 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) – 9 January 1993 * 14 – None * 24 – uncharacterized * 26 - “JGA” (Entry Level Performance and Conduct) * 28 –...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003179

    Original file (20110003179.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to amend item 24 (Character of Service) to show "honorable" instead of "uncharacterized." It specifies that "Soldiers of the USAR ordered to active duty for a period in excess of 90 days will, upon release from active duty, revert to control of the appropriate RC" and that the "service of Soldiers specified in this paragraph who are in an entry-level status will be uncharacterized,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009678

    Original file (20110009678.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of an earlier request that her U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge be changed from uncharacterized to honorable. There is no evidence of record that shows she completed AIT. However, she provided her EPSBD proceedings which indicate in 1986 the EPSBD found her medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and determined her foot condition existed prior to her entry into military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004547

    Original file (20110004547.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The record shows he was not separated at that time. (2) Does not disqualify him or her for retention in the military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), chapter 3. b. Paragraph 5-1 of the version in effect at the time stated unless the reason for separation required a specific characterization, a Soldier being separated for the convenience of the Government will be awarded a character of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003927

    Original file (20110003927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon his first discharge from active duty in 1990, he was told that they couldn’t put honorable on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) because he had served less than 180 days. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, stated an honorable discharge was a separation with honor. Notwithstanding the DD Form 214 of another individual submitted by the applicant, the evidence shows the applicant, as a member of the USAR, was in an entry level status during his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003193

    Original file (20130003193.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 12 January 1995 to show he received an honorable vice an uncharacterized discharge. The separation document is to provide the individual with a complete and accurate documentary evidence of their military service.