Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008522
Original file (20110008522.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	 29 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110008522 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and all other authorized decorations, medals, and badges.

2.  The applicant states he received other awards, to include the Army Good Conduct Medal, but his copy of the DD Form 214 only shows the National Defense Service Medal.  He is proud to have served his country and would do it again if called. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* a letter from a Presidio County Veterans Service Officer, dated 19 April 2011
* Bronze Star Medal Certificate for the period January 1968 to October 1968
* his DD Form 214
* his DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 20 December 2000

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error 


or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 6 October 1966.  After completing training he was awarded military occupational specialty 13A (field artillery basic).

3.  He served in the Vietnam from 5 January 1968 to 23 September 1968 while assigned to Battery C, 7th Battalion, 13th Artillery.

4.  On 23 September 1968, he was honorably released from active duty as an overseas returnee.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  He served 1 year, 11 months, and 18 days of total active service.  His record contains a DD Form 214 that shows in item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendation, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)
* one overseas service bar

5.  His military personnel record does not contain any orders for award of the Bronze Star Medal.

6.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Bronze Star Medal pertaining to the applicant.

7.  He provided a letter of support from the Presidio County Veterans Service officer and a copy of a BSM certificate for the period January to October 1968.


8.  His record is void of documentation showing he was recommended for or awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during his military service.  His record is void of any derogatory information or a commander's disqualification that could serve to disqualify him for this award.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Bronze Star Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service, 
not involving participation in aerial flight, in connection with military operations against an armed enemy, or while engaged military operations involving conflict with an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required. (emphasis added).

10.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.  

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22, paragraph 2-13, contains the regulatory guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal.  It states that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in.  Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, the applicant participated in the following four campaigns:

* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III (1 June 1967 - 29 January 1968)
* Tet Counteroffensive (30 January - 1 April 1968)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase IV (2 April - 30 June 1968)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase V (1 July 1968 - 22 February 1969)

12.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows the 7th Battalion, 13th Artillery, the unit to which the applicant was assigned, was cited for award of the:

* Meritorious Unit Commendation for the period 9 November 1966 through 31 December 1968 by Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 70, dated 1969
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 1 August 1965 through 16 April 1971 by DAGO Number 54, dated 1974

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Bronze Star Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal, and all other authorized decorations, medals, and badges was carefully considered and found to have partial merit.

2.  The evidence of record confirms he honorably served during the period
6 October 1966 through 23 September 1968.  He received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and there is no record of any derogatory information or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from receiving the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

3.  He participated in four campaign phases during his service in Vietnam.  Therefore, he is entitled to four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show these bronze service stars.

4.  His unit in Vietnam was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during his period of assignment.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these unit awards.

5.  There is no evidence of record showing he was recommended for or awarded the Bronze Star Medal by official orders.  Additionally, a review of ADCARS did not reveal any orders for the Bronze Star Medal pertaining to the applicant.  Although he submitted a Bronze Star Medal Certificate in support of his application, the certificate alone is insufficient for adding the Bronze Star Medal to his DD Form 214.  Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting this portion of his request.

6.  The applicant further contends his copy of the DD Form 214 only shows award of the National Defense Service Medal.  However, his official military personnel file contains a copy of his DD Form 214 that shows the awards as listed in CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE, paragraph 4.  Therefore, a copy of the referenced DD Form 214 will be provided to the applicant with these Proceedings.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal;

	b.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period
6 October 1966 through 23 September 1968; and

	c.  adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the:

* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars
* Meritorious Unit Commendation
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation 

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to adding a Bronze Star Medal to his DD Form 214.



      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110008522



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110008522



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012494

    Original file (20120012494.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is also no evidence in his military record indicating he was awarded a second Purple Heart. There is no evidence in his military record showing he was awarded a second award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214; and b. adding to his DD Form 214 the following: * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * Sharpshooter Marksmanship...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017571

    Original file (20140017571.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 2 June 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140017571 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), for the period ending 13 November 1978, to show he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) (2nd Oak Leaf Cluster) and to show he is authorized 4 bronze service stars on his previously-authorized Vietnam Service Medal and the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). Permanent Orders 229-01,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018191

    Original file (20130018191.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This pamphlet shows the unit to which the applicant was assigned, Company A, 3rd Battalion, 39th Infantry Regiment, was cited for the following awards and decorations: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, for the period 1 July 1968 through 13 November 1968, by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 31, dated 1969 * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (2nd Award), for the period 1 January 1969 through 30 June 1969, by DAGO Number...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709790

    Original file (9709790.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, based on the information available, it appears that the applicant’s administrative discharge was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time. However, the undesirable discharge appears unduly harsh considering his years of honorable service, including two tours in Vietnam. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was separated from the service with a General Discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010899

    Original file (20100010899.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 October 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100010899 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Subsequent to his first period on active duty, his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) was amended to show participation in five campaigns and he was issued the Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star. As the applicant's record shows he participated in five campaign phases during his tour in Vietnam, he is entitled to one silver service star for wear on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012888

    Original file (20090012888.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed Basic Airborne training and that special orders awarded him the Parachutist Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016994

    Original file (20100016994.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show the Bronze Star Medal with First Oak Leaf Cluster or the Army Good Conduct Medal. Based on completing a qualifying period of honorable service he is entitled to award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for the period 11 October 1966 to 15 August 1969 and correction to his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018862

    Original file (20070018862.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) be corrected to show that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (First Oak Leaf Cluster). On 4 February 1972, Headquarters, U.S. Army Engineer Command, Vietnam General Orders Number 203 was published awarding the applicant the Bronze Star Medal (First Oak Leaf Cluster) for meritorious service in the Republic of Vietnam from 10 March 1971 to 9 March 1972. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026256

    Original file (20100026256.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his records be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart and the Good Conduct Medal. In addition to the awards listed on the applicant's DD Form 214 he is also authorized award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214: the Purple Heart, Good Conduct Medal, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030338

    Original file (20100030338.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 22 (Statement of Service), block c (Foreign and/or Sea Service), shows he served in USARV for 4 years, 5 months, and 3 days; c. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows the National Defense Service Medal, Meritorious Unit Commendation, Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with (1960) Device, and six Overseas Service Bars. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards)...