Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008467
Original file (20110008467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  19 October 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110008467 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960).

2.  He states he/his:

* was a command sergeant major with over 20 years of experience in the U.S. Army
* believes he qualifies for both medals
* was directly supporting operations in Vietnam and they [his unit] supplied Air Force personnel for bombing runs in North Vietnam out of his base in Thailand
* unit, 501st Field Depot, deactivated and he was the last acting command sergeant major of that supply depot
* unit supplied food, clothing, fuel and ammunition to Sattihip Bangkok Air Force Base, Udorn Laos Border, Nakhon Phanom (NKP), Takli Air Force Base, Korat Air Force Base, and Sakakohon Air Force Base 

3.  He provides various orders (temporary duty, discharge, assignment, and appointment), and internet information on the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960).



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100018649 on 10 February 2011.  

2.  The applicant provided new arguments and evidence [as indicated above] that will be considered by the Board.  

3.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 April 1948 and he continued to serve on active duty through a series of reenlistments.  

4.  He provided the following orders which show:

Headquarters Issuing Order
Action 
Effective/report date
U.S. Army 6th Recruiting District, Special Orders Number 34, dated 24 February 1967
Reassigned to 501st Depot, Granite City Army Depot Illinois 
5 March 1967
501st Field Depot, Special Orders Number 30, dated 28 March 1967
Appointed to promotion board
28 March 1967
U.S. Army Support Thailand, Special Orders Number 98, dated 27 April 1967
Honorably discharged and reenlisted in the Regular Army 
28 April 1967 and 29 April 1967
501st Field Depot, Letter Order Number T-397, dated 6 September 1967
Temporary duty to Thailand for Noncommissioned Officer Advisory Council Meeting for 3 days
15 September 1967
Special Orders Number 188, dated 13 October 1967
Appointed to promotion board
13 October 1967
501st Field Depot, Special Orders Number 211, dated 14 November 1967
Reassigned to Headquarters, U.S. Army Recruiting District
8 March 1968
501st Field Depot, Special Orders Number 229, dated 7 December 1967
Appointed to Character Guidance Council 
7 December 1967
5.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 28 April 1967 shows in:

* Item 11b (Station or Installation at Which Effected) the entry "Camp Friendship, Thailand"
* Item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) the entry "501st Field Depot, APO SF 96233, USARPAC [U.S. Army Pacific]"
* Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) the entry "USARPAC  0  1  13" indicating 1 month and 13 days

6.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 April 1968 shows in:

* Item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) the entry "501st Field Depot, USARPAC"
* Item 20 (Place or Entry into Current Active Service) the entry "Camp Friendship, Thailand"
* Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) the entry "USARPAC  0  10  9"

7.  His service record does not contain evidence which shows he served in direct support of operations in Vietnam.

8.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign, Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Forms 214 do not show award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960).

9.  The applicant was honorably retired on 30 April 1968, in the rank/grade of sergeant major (SGM)/E-9, by reason of retirement with over 20 years of service. He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Retired).

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations.  Members in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for this award.  "Direct support" is defined as services being supplied the combat forces in the area of operations by ground units, ships, and aircraft providing supplies and equipment to the forces concerned, provided it involves actually entering the designated area, and ships and aircraft providing fire, patrol, guard, reconnaissance, or other military support.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.  Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam required the individual to provide direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions in regard to his entitlement to award of the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) are acknowledged.  However, the evidence of record does not support his claims.

2.  The evidence of record shows he served a tour of duty in Thailand with the 501st Field Depot.  However, no evidence is available which confirms he served in direct support of the Republic of Vietnam during his assignment in Thailand.  He states his unit provided supplies to Air Force Bases located in Thailand.  It appears his unit provided "indirect support," not "direct support."

3.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to grant him award of the Vietnam Service Medal or Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960).

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20100018649, dated 10 February 2011.  



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110008467





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110008467



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018649

    Original file (20100018649.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam required the individual to provide direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Although evidence in the applicant's service personnel records shows that he served a tour of duty in Thailand with the 501st Field Depot, there is no evidence nor did he provide any evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027669

    Original file (20100027669.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Notwithstanding the letter from NPRC, the evidence of record failed to show his entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal or the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001256

    Original file (20130001256.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he would like his DD Form 214 to be an accurate record of his military service. It also shows in: a. item 22 (Statement of Service), block c (Foreign and/or Sea Service), the entry "Thailand" - 0 years, 11 months, and 17 days; and b. item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized): * National Defense Service Medal * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-14) Bar 6. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011264

    Original file (20080011264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) were omitted from his DD Form 214, but that he was awarded these medals for his service in Vietnam and Thailand with the 9th Logistical Command and the United States Army Vietnam Support Depot, Thailand (USASUPTHAI). The applicant provides an undated self-authored memorandum; his DD Form 214; DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period 25...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020041

    Original file (20100020041.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). c. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 11 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010464

    Original file (20120010464.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the: * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Combat Patch [Shoulder Sleeve Insignia] 2. The applicant states: * his DD Form 214 shows his tour of duty in Thailand during the Vietnam War * based upon Army Regulations, he is entitled to the awards and combat patch 3. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012192

    Original file (20120012192.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and any other awards he may be entitled to. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show the VSM, RVN Campaign...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017548

    Original file (20100017548.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) to show the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. He states the medals were not recorded on his DD Form 214 or DA Form 20 due to an oversight.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005279

    Original file (20120005279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant's unit served in direct support of operations in Vietnam. Members in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for the Vietnam Service Medal. There is no evidence of record and the applicant has provided no evidence which shows that while serving in Thailand he served in direct support of operations in Vietnam as defined by the awards regulation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013894

    Original file (20110013894.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s qualifying period of service in Thailand is not in question; however, there is insufficient evidence that shows his service in Thailand was in direct support of operations in Vietnam. Therefore, absent any evidence indicating he or his unit served in direct support of operations in the Republic of Vietnam, the regulatory criteria necessary to support award of the Vietnam Service...