Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008428
Original file (20110008428.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  25 October 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110008428 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 13a (Character of Service) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show "Honorable" service.

2.  The applicant states item 13a of his DD Form 214 contains no entry and it should be completed to show honorable service.  He further states he is unable to gain access to Department of Veterans Affairs benefits because item 13a is blank.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)
* Letter Orders Number 09-1380523

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 17 October 1966.  His records show he completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11C (Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman).  The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was specialist four (SP4)/E-4.

3.  The applicant’s records contain the following documents:

   a.  DA Form 20, Item 38 (Record of Assignments), showing he had “excellent” conduct and efficiency throughout his period of service.
   
   b.  Special Orders Number 250, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center, Infantry and Fort Polk, LA, dated 3 October 1968, releasing him from active duty (REFRAD) and transferred him to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training), effective 16 October 1968.

	c.  DD Form 214, dated 16 October 1968, releasing him from active duty and transferring him to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining 4 year service obligation.

   d.  Letter Order Number 09-1380523, issued by Department of the Army, Office of the Adjutant General, USAR Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, MO, dated 20 September 1972, honorably discharging him from the USAR Control Group (Standby), effective 16 October 1972. 

4.  There is no entry in Item 13a of the applicant’s DD Form 214 ending on
16 October 1968.  Item 15 (Reenlistment Code) contains the entry “RE-1.”

5.  The applicant’s record is void of any documentation from his commander indicating his service would be characterized as general, under honorable conditions.  

6.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) contains the Army’s enlisted separation policy.  Paragraph 1-9 contained guidance on characterizing a member’s service.  It stated, in pertinent part, that a member’s service would be characterized as honorable if the individual had conduct ratings of at least “good,” had efficiency ratings of at least “fair,” and had not been convicted by a general court-martial or by more than one special court-martial.  
7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The instructions for item 13a contained in the version of the regulation in effect at the time of the applicant’s REFRAD stated to enter one of the following:  “Honorable,” ”Under Honorable Conditions,” “Under Conditions Other Than Honorable,” or “Dishonorable.”  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request to correct item 13a of his DD Form 214 ending on
16 October 1968 to show his character of service as “Honorable” has been carefully considered and found to have merit.

2.  The evidence of record is void of any indication that a determination was made by the appropriate authority that the applicant’s service would be characterized as anything other than fully honorable.  

3.  Further, his record confirms he met all the requirements necessary to receive an “Honorable” characterization of service at the time of his REFRAD, as evidenced by the conduct and efficiency ratings in item 38 of his DA Form 20 and absent any court-martial convictions during his active duty tenure. 

4.  In view of the facts of this case, it appears clear that the blank entry in item 13a of his DD Form 214 was the result of an administrative error made during the applicant’s separation processing.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to amend his DD Form 214 by entering in item 13a the entry “Honorable.”

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 by entering in item 13a the entry “Honorable” and providing him a document to show this correction.




      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110008428



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110008428



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015465

    Original file (20140015465.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DD Form 214 shows the applicant entered active duty this period on 28 March 1966, was released from active duty on 28 March 1969, and was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his Reserve obligation. An honorable discharge is a separation with honor. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 13a of his DD Form 214, dated 28 March 1969, the entry "HONORABLE."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023422

    Original file (20100023422.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his honorable service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 by: a. adding the entry "HONORABLE" to item 13a; b. adding the entry "DD Form 256A" to item 13b; and c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016663

    Original file (20090016663.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant received an award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for his first qualifying period of service that included no court-martial convictions or acceptance of nonjudicial punishment. Therefore, based on the evidence of record and the general regulations that provide for award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019820

    Original file (20080019820.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that item 13a (Character of Service) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the entry, “Honorable.” 2. The applicant states that the DD Form 214 issued upon his separation from active service failed to show his character of service was honorable. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of record shows the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the USAR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003224

    Original file (20090003224.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s record shows that he was inducted into the Army and entered active duty on 11 June 1966. The governing regulation in effect at the time of the applicant’s REFRAD provided no provisions for an entry of “Honorable Conditions” in item 13a of the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022451

    Original file (20100022451.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant may submit a request in writing to: Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command Cold War Recognition Program ATTN: AHRC-CWRS 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue Fort Knox, KY 40122 Therefore, this portion of the applicant's request will not be discussed further in these Proceedings. Further, the record confirms he completed over 1 year of qualifying honorable active federal service and he received “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016096C080407

    Original file (20070016096C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show his service was characterized as honorable. The evidence of record confirms the applicant's request for a hardship discharge was approved by proper authority, and that the orders authorizing his discharge provided that he would receive an honorable discharge (DD Form 256A). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017078

    Original file (20140017078.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) which shows in: a. item 29 (Qualification in Arms), he qualified as a: (1) Sharpshooter with the M-60 machine gun on 26 February 1969; and (2) Marksman with the M-16 rifle on 20 February 1969. b. item 31 (Foreign Service), he served in U.S. Army Pacific Command (USARPAC) - Korea from 25 April 1969 through 24 May 1970, a period of 1 year and 1 month; c. item 33 (Appointments and Reductions), no indication that he was promoted to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063398C070421

    Original file (2001063398C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was issued a DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, and was returned to the Wisconsin Army National Guard. The applicant was released from active duty on 10 August 1962 and returned to state control as a member of the Wisconsin Army National Guard. In pertinent part, it directs that a DD Form 214 will be prepared for each member of the Army National Guard released after completion of 90 days or more of active duty for training.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014171

    Original file (20080014171.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 12 January 1970 in support of his application. The evidence of record shows that Special Orders advanced the applicant to the rank/grade of PFC/E-3, effective 22 November 1968. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s REFRAD orders indicate his rank was SP4.