Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008210
Original file (20110008210.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 August 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110008210 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was wounded on Heart Break Ridge, but he did not think it was important enough to mention after seeing his friends shot and killed.

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored statement, a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer of Discharge), and a DA Form 493 (Separation Qualification Record)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, and has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant’s military record is not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s record was lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there are sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record and provided by the applicant to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States and he entered active service on 29 March 1951.  He held military occupational specialty 1500 (recreation supervisor).  The highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was master sergeant (MSGT) (Temporary).

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 28 December 1952 and he was transferred to the Enlisted Reserve Corps to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  Item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart.

5.  There is no evidence in the available record showing he was awarded the Purple Heart.

6.  There is no evidence in the available record showing he sustained any injuries as a result of hostile action or that he was treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.

7.  The applicant's self-authored statement indicates that while making an assault on Heart Break Ridge a bullet grazed his upper lip just missing his nose.   The applicant noticed he was bleeding from the wound on his lip but did not think his wound was important enough to mention after seeing his friends get shot and killed or seriously wounded.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for the Purple Heart has been carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence in the available record and the applicant 

has not provided any evidence to show he was injured as a result of hostile action, he was treated for the injuries sustained, and medical treatment was made a matter of official records.

2.  Unfortunately, there are no medical records available to justify the awarding the applicant the Purple Heart.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, administrative regularity is presumed in the applicant's case.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

4.  The applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110008210



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110008210



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019403

    Original file (20100019403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This extract recounts the attack and lists the number of casualties, but makes no mention of the applicant by name. They each recall the attack that occurred on 3 December 1967. a. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have been treated by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006583C070208

    Original file (20040006583C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 August 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040006583 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. This medical record shows the following entries under "Diagnosis": “Contusion, right lip, mild, a.i. These records also show that the medical authorities who treated the applicant at that time determined that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014918

    Original file (20080014918.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, through his brother and elected representative, that the Military Awards Branch (MAB) awarded the Army Commendation Medal to the eyewitness to the applicant’s wounding for his heroic actions on 20 April 1952 during an enemy attack. Located in hills north of the 38th parallel north in the central Korean mountain range, the battle was fought between the communist North Korean forces of the Korean People's Army (KPA) and United Nations (UN) forces consisting of Republic...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020351

    Original file (20090020351.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. Thus, based on the available evidence, it is concluded that the applicant was wounded in action in Korea on 4 July 1953. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 27 of his DD Form 214 the Korean Service Medal with one bronze service star, b. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in Korea...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017426

    Original file (20080017426.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also requests that Item 29 (Wounds Received as a Result of Action With Enemy Forces) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) with an effective date of 9 September 1952 be corrected to show "shrapnel wound to left arm." VA Rating Decision, dated 10 September 2008, granted the applicant service connection for residuals of a shrapnel wound to his left arm as ordered by the BVA. In the absence of military records which show that the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004493

    Original file (20150004493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 2 June 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150004493 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides * self-authored statement * Standard Form (SF) 601 (Immunization Record) * page 4 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * DD Form 214 * letter, dated 3 April 2015, to the applicant from the Army Review Boards Agency * letter, dated 23 April 2015, to the applicant from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) with enclosure (Patient Inquiry) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069177C070402

    Original file (2002069177C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. The applicant received the Army Commendation Medal; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006393

    Original file (20090006393.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds received during service in the Republic of Vietnam. The applicant provides, in support of his application, a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), the first page of DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II), and a portion of his service medical records showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016492

    Original file (20090016492.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 33 does not show award of the Purple Heart. c. DVA medical reports dated 9 May and 22 April 2002 describe the applicant as having been shot in the left foot during WWII and that he was sent to a field hospital for treatment where he was put in a cast for about a month. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009025

    Original file (20130009025.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSM's military service records are not available to the Board for review. There is no evidence in the available military service records that shows the FSM was awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant contends the FSM's records should be corrected to show he was wounded in action and that he was awarded the Purple Heart based on the entry "GO33WD45: New Guinea" in item 32 of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55.