Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007913
Original file (20110007913.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  11 October 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110007913 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be awarded the Purple Heart.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM should have been awarded the Purple Heart for shrapnel wounds to the back received on 12 August 1967.  However, due to administrative oversight caused by mass casualties of 
12 August 1967 he was not awarded the Purple Heart. 

3.  The applicant provides letters of support from the FSM’s former team leader and commander, a copy of the FSM’s death certificate, and his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM was inducted into the Army in Chicago, Illinois on 1 September 1966.  He completed his basic training at Fort Lewis, Washington and his advanced individual training as a light weapons infantryman at Fort Polk, Louisiana before being transferred to Vietnam on 8 March 1967.

2.  He was assigned to Company C, 3d Battalion, 60th Infantry Regiment, 9th Infantry Division. 

3.  A review of the available medical records contained in his official records show that on 26 August 1967, he was treated from combat fatigue related to an 
episode on 13 August 1967 in which five of the FSM’s buddies were killed.  The FSM was repeating the names of all of his buddies wounded in action.  He was prescribed “Thorazine” and placed under observation.

4.  On 19 September 1967 he was treated for trouble with his left ear and was told to return in 1 week.

5.  On 20 September 1967 he was reassigned to the 9th Administration Company for duty as a carpenter, where he remained for the duration of his tour.

6.  He departed Vietnam on 7 March 1968 and was transferred to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri where he served as a military policeman until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 30 August 1968 due to the expiration of his term of service (ETS).  He had served 2 years of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Army Commendation Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the Air Medal. 

7.  A review of his separation physical/medical examination conducted on 22 July 1968 reveals no entries regarding any wounds or treatment for shrapnel wounds in Vietnam.  Additionally, his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) contains no entries in block 40 under “Wounds.”

8.  Overall, a review of his official records failed to show any evidence to show that the FSM was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action or that treatment for such injuries were made a matter of record.  Additionally, the FSM’s name is not contained on the Vietnam Casualty Listing.

9.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for award of the Purple Heart. 

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that the FSM was wounded/injured in Vietnam is not in doubt, the evidence submitted with her application and the evidence of record fails to show that he was injured as a result of enemy action and that treatment for his injuries was made a matter of record.  Therefore, absent such evidence, there appears to be no basis to award him the Purple Heart at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. 

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by her late husband in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110007913





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110007913



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012332

    Original file (20140012332.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, it would be appropriate to posthumously award the FSM the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021262

    Original file (20100021262.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart and all other awards or decorations he may be authorized. The FSM's record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 does not indicate any combat wounds, his medical records are not available...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014964

    Original file (20100014964.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant received medical treatment on 11 February 1967 for a fragment wound to his right upper leg. f. Therefore, based on the available evidence, the applicant should be awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 27 January 1967. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014834

    Original file (20130014834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His military records also do not contain orders awarding him the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 3 April 1967 through 5...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011993

    Original file (20100011993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 October 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100011993 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. An 11 April 1969 Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) states the FSM was found to be unfit for duty due to the residuals of his 14 February 1968 wounds incurred as result of hostile action. __________X__________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000425

    Original file (20100000425.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The document provided clearly identifies the applicant and shows he was treated for a shrapnel wound that he received from a booby trap on 12 July 1968. c. Despite the absence of any additional evidence in the applicant's military personnel records, it is concluded that the available...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012489

    Original file (20080012489.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is insufficient evidence to award the Purple Heart. __________X_______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080012489 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080012489 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025730

    Original file (20100025730.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's Representative in Congress states the applicant is 88 years old and has been fighting for the FSM's Purple Heart since her first application in May 2008. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013062

    Original file (20080013062.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to show that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his records to show this award. The evidence of record shows the FSM was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the FSM the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 18 May 1968 in the Republic of Vietnam; b. awarding the FSM the Good Conduct Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009540

    Original file (20110009540.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She also requests a personal hearing: * his prisoner of war (POW) status and the POW Medal * his Green Beret status * Silver Star * Bronze Star Medal * Air Medal * Purple Heart * Republic of Vietnam Wound Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * South Vietnam Armed Forces Honor Medal, 2nd Class * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar * Parachutist Badge * his foreign service in Vietnam 2. The FSM was...