IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 13 October 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110006522
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests reconsideration for award of the Purple Heart through his Member of Congress (MOC).
2. His MOC states the applicant contends he was not awarded the Purple Heart he earned in 1965.
3. He provides:
* his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* a self-authored letter
* a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100023256 on 24 March 2011.
2. The applicant submitted the complete VA Rating Decision and a self-authored letter which are considered to be new evidence in his case.
3. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from 12 May 1965 through 2 October 1966. He was assigned to Company D (Maintenance), 173rd Support Battalion, in military occupational specialty 68D (Aircraft Engine Repairman).
4. His records do not contain any documentation showing he was wounded as a result of hostile action or that he received treatment for such wounds.
5. On 1 November 1966, he was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement). His DD Form 214 does not indicate he was ever wounded and does not show award of the Purple Heart.
6. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.
7. He provided a self-authored letter which states that while serving as a member of an aircraft maintenance platoon on 24 August 1965 they came under a mortar attack from the enemy. Several mortars exploded in the area of their bunker and living quarters and he received a burn to his left heel caused by a large piece of shrapnel in the process of running to the nearest bunker for shelter. He was admitted to the Army field hospital and received medical treatment for his wounds.
8. His VA Rating Decision states the applicant's medical records show that he burned his left heel when he stepped on a piece of hot shrapnel from hostile action and that it occurred on the date he had stated.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the Purple Heart to a member of the Armed Force of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services after 5 April 1917, was wounded or killed or who died or may die after being wounded in any action against an enemy of the United States. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends he should have been awarded the Purple Heart for wounds he received from stepping on a piece of hot shrapnel as a result of enemy action. His contentions were carefully considered.
2. Although the applicant submitted a self-authored letter and his VA Rating Decision which describe the injury to his left heel as a result of hot shrapnel from the enemy, he has not provided sufficient evidence such as a copy of the medical documentation from that event which shows the treatment and the surrounding circumstances.
3. Absent sufficient medical evidence, he is not entitled to the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ____X____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20100023256, dated 24 March 2011.
2. The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation. The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.
____________X_____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110006522
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110006522
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006922
The applicant states he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and was wounded on his left foot, on 2 May 1968, by shrapnel from an incoming mortar and the medical treatment is recorded in his medical records. A review of the applicant's military personnel record failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. In order to support awarding a member the Purple Heart, it is necessary to establish the wound for which the award is being made required...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000829
He has the piece of shrapnel that was taken from his arm while at the hospital. There is no medical evidence in his available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action while in an active duty status. He provides a statement of support wherein one individual stated the applicant was wounded in the arm and had not shot himself.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018181
There are no general orders in the applicant's records that show award of the Purple Heart. AR 600-8-22 also provides that there are no time limitations for requests for award of the Purple Heart. Given that the applicant did not receive orders awarding him the Purple Heart, his name is not on the Vietnam Casualty List, and nothing in his official records shows he was wounded, the preponderance of evidence weighs against awarding him the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023256
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for injuries he sustained from direct enemy actions. The VA determination letter submitted by the applicant is insufficient evidence to support his contention that he was wounded as a result of enemy action.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003607
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart (PH) is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1129 for award of the Purple Heart, the Secretary of the Army will treat a member of the Armed Forces described in ( a ), below, in the same manner as a member who is killed or wounded in action as the result of an act of an enemy of the United States. There are no orders awarding...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001134
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 MARCH 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090001134 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states that he was wounded by shrapnel during a mortar attack on 20 July 2006. However, there is no evidence of record which verifies his injuries were a result of hostile action.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003891
The applicant states that he earned the Purple Heart while he was serving in Vietnam by being wounded during an enemy mortar attack. A review of the applicants Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain evidence that the applicant was ever wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy forces while he was in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04101104C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded on 12 November 1965 while serving in Vietnam. He noted that the applicant had "applied for the Purple Heart Medal for wounds received in action in Vietnam."
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003103
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He requests, through his Congressional representative, reconsideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision denying him the award of the Purple Heart. The service medical treatment record, provided by the applicant, indicates that on 5 July 1969 he was treated for a puncture wound on the bottom of his right foot and had sand debris in the wound.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016304
He and his buddy jumped out of the helicopter before they landed and they were under fire as soon as they hit the ground. The hand-written diary the applicant submitted contains entries from May 1966 to 9 July (1967). There is no evidence to show this is shrapnel or that he received it as a result of enemy action.