Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006387
Original file (20110006387.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110006387


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, her deceased husband was a former service member (FSM) of the South Carolina Army National Guard (SCARNG).  On 7 September 1995, he received his notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (20-Year Letter).  At that time, he made an illegal SBP election when he elected child only coverage based on the full amount of his retired pay under Option C (immediate coverage).  He never obtained the applicant's approval for an option less than spouse only coverage.

3.  The applicant provides:

* a June 1993 Handbook on Retirement Services with highlighted passages
* a State of South Carolina, Probate Court, Fiduciary Letters, dated 16 September 2010
* a State of South Carolina marriage certificate
* a State of South Carolina death certificate
* an Order of Service for the FSM's funeral

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant and the FSM were married on 15 October 1981.

2.  The FSM served in the SCARNG from 2 July 1974 to 1 July 1996.  On 7 September 1995, he received his 20-Year Letter stating he qualified for non-regular retirement at age 60.

3.  On 2 December 1995, the FSM completed a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate).  At that time, he elected:

* children only coverage

* for a daughter born on 14 April 1982
* for a son born on 9 August 1984

* an annuity based on the full amount of his retired pay
* Option C, immediate coverage
* the form is signed by the FSM and witnessed by his first sergeant; however, it is not signed by the applicant

4.  The FSM died on 6 March 2010 at age 56.  His children were ages 27 and 
25 at the time of his death.

5.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established SBP.  SBP is a plan whereby a portion of a military retiree's pay is paid to a category of beneficiary.  Without this plan, all retired pay would stop upon the death of the retiree.  The plan, which is partially funded by the government, is paid for by monthly deductions from the retired pay of the member.  The decision to elect in or out of the coverage is made at the time of retirement and is generally irrevocable.

6.  Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985, but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse’s written concurrence for a retiring active duty member’s election that provides less than maximum spouse coverage (10 USC 1448(a)(3)(A)).

7.  Public Law 106-398, enacted 30 October 2000, requires Reserve and Guard members, who have completed their service obligation and considered entitled for retired pay, but who are not yet age 60, to obtain their spouses' concurrence 
in SBP elections that do not provide maximum spouse coverage (immediate option).  This applies to members receiving notification of service completion after 1 January 2001.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests an SBP annuity as a result of the FSM's death.
2.  When he completed his DD Form 1883 in 1995, the FSM was not required to obtain the applicant's signature if he elected other than spouse only maximum SBP coverage.  He elected children only coverage and he did not obtain the applicant's concurrence.  This was a legal election and is, therefore, valid.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110006387



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110006387



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020974

    Original file (20090020974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests, in effect, that the records of the FSM be corrected to show: * the applicant is entitled to Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) benefits * the applicant is eligible to receive 20 percent of the FSM's retired pay 2. The divorce decree indicated that the applicant was to receive 20 percent of the FSM's retired pay. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005326

    Original file (20070005326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that the FSM's records be corrected to show that he completed an RCSBP (Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan) election certificate and that she be granted a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60, to provide an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140008134

    Original file (AR20140008134.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * the FSM falsified his DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) to reflect that he was not married * she was not afforded the opportunity to be notified of his election and was denied her entitlements * the FSM was eligible for full retirement * she and the FSM were married on 25 April 1986 and never divorced or legally separated * the FSM signed the DD Form 1883 on 7 December 1996 3. The applicant and the FSM were married on 25 April 1986. The FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013510

    Original file (20090013510.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In Part V (SBP Election) on this form, the FSM indicated that he was married and did not have dependent children. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Considering there is evidence to show it was the FSM's intent to provide SBP coverage for the applicant, it would be appropriate, as a matter of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006861

    Original file (20090006861.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence to show that the FSM was ever issued a 20-year letter and his Army National Guard Retirement Points History Statement Application for Retirement Pay contains the entry "NO" next to Notice of Eligibility. Inasmuch as there is no evidence that shows that the FSM was provided an opportunity to make an RCSPB election, the applicant is entitled by law to a spouse annuity under RCSBP beginning on the day after her husband's death. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007184

    Original file (20140007184.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests her barred claim to receive a Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity be granted dating back to her spouse's death. The applicant provides: * License and Certificate for Marriage * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * Orders 8-2 * Notice of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter) * DD Form 1883 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002790C070206

    Original file (20050002790C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse only coverage. Records at the U.S. Army Human Resources Command - St. Louis indicate that the FSM's records did not contain a DD Form 1883. The FSM's 20-year letter was issued in 1993.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003512

    Original file (20120003512.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 21 August 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120003512 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Public Law 95-397, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for Reserve Component members who qualified for Reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60 and eligible to participate in the SBP, to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options were available: * elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005677

    Original file (20140005677.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 November 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140005677 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The FSM's DD Form 1883, dated 7 November 2001, shows he elected Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) Option A (Defer) and declined to make an election at that time, but he would remain eligible to make an election for coverage at age 60. The DD Form 1883 shows both the FSM and the applicant signed on 6 November 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000391C070208

    Original file (20040000391C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since it thus appears the applicant did not give her consent to the FSM's child only coverage RCSBP election, by law the FSM's RCSBP election defaulted to spouse coverage. The FSM did not indicate on the DD Form 1883 which option he desired. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that the FSM elected to participate in the RCSBP for child only coverage, full base amount, option C but that the...