Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006352
Original file (20110006352.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110006352 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to major (MAJ)/pay grade O-4 from 10 January 2011 to 1 March 2010 with all back pay and allowances due as a result of the correction.

 2.  The applicant states he was selected for promotion by the Department of the Army Promotion Board in June 2009 while he was deployed to Iraq.

	a.  He was officially assigned to an O-4 position on 1 March 2010.  According to the governing Army regulation, he should have a promotion date that matches the date of his assignment to the duty position.

	b.  His promotion packet was submitted after his assignment to the position, but it was held up at the Division/State level for many months.

	c.  As a result, he was not promoted to MAJ until 10 January 2011.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his reassignment orders, promotion orders, and an extract of Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers), paragraph 4-21 (Effective Dates).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army in the rank of second lieutenant on 13 May 1994.  He transferred to the Army National Guard (ARNG) of the United States (ARNGUS) and Texas ARNG on 16 July 1994.

2.  He was promoted to captain/O-3 effective 19 December 2002.

3.  Orders 285-1051, Texas ARNG, Austin, Texas, dated 12 October 2010, reassigned the applicant to paragraph 106, line 01, duty position plans officer, duty specialty skill identifier 02A007G (Combat Arms Immaterial), effective 1 March 2010.

4.  The applicant was selected for promotion to MAJ by a Department of the Army Promotion Board, the results of which were released in June 2009.

5.  Orders 010-1016, Texas ARNG, Austin, Texas, dated 10 January 2011, promoted the applicant to MAJ/O-4 effective 10 January 2011.  The additional instructions show:  "Duty Position Title, Paragraph/Line, Area of Concentration:  Plans Officer, 106/01, 02A00."

6.  Special Orders Number 11 AR, National Guard Bureau (NGB), dated 20 January 2011, announced the extension of Federal recognition in the ARNG of the applicant's promotion to MAJ/O-4 effective 10 January 2011.

7.  NGB memorandum, dated 20 January 2011, subject:  Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army, promoted the applicant to MAJ/O-4 in the Reserve of the Army for service in the ARNGUS effective 10 January 2011.

8.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Personnel Policy Division, NGB.

	a.  The advisory official recommends approval of the applicant's request for adjustment of the date of his promotion to MAJ, effective and with a DOR of 1 March 2010, along with all back pay and allowances that may be due as a result of this correction.

   b.  The TXARNG concurs with adjustment of the applicant's promotion date to MAJ effective 1 March 2010.

9.  National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officers - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for processing applications for Federal recognition.

	a.  Paragraph 8-1 states the promotion of officers in the ARNG is a function of the State.  As in original appointments, a commissioned officer promoted by State authorities has a State status in the higher grade under which to function.

	b.  Paragraph 8-2b states that, except as provided in this chapter, promotion will be accomplished only when an appropriate modified table of organization and equipment (MTOE) or table of distribution and allowances (TDA) position vacancy in the grade exists in the unit.

10.  Army Regulation 135-155 prescribes policy and procedures used for selecting and promoting commissioned officers (other than commissioned warrant officers) of the ARNGUS and of commissioned and warrant officers of the U.S. Army Reserve.  Chapter 4 (Processing Selection Board Recommendations), paragraph 4-21, provides that promotion of unit officers selected by a mandatory board will have a promotion date and effective date no earlier than the date the board is approved, provided they are assigned to a position in the higher grade.  When the board approval is before assignment to the position in the higher grade, the effective date and the date of promotion will be the date of assignment to the higher-graded position.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for promotion to MAJ/O-4 by a Department of the Army Promotion Board, the results of which were released in June 2009.

	a.  The governing regulations provide that promotion will be accomplished when an appropriate MTOE or TDA position vacancy in the grade exists in the unit and the Soldier is assigned to the higher-graded position.

 	b.  The applicant was assigned to an O-4 position on 1 March 2010; however, he was not promoted to MAJ by the Texas ARNG or granted Federal recognition by the NGB until 10 January 2011.

2.  Therefore, in view of the foregoing and as a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's records to show he was promoted to MAJ/O-4 in the Reserve of the Army, ARNGUS, and Texas ARNG effective and with a DOR of 1 March 2010.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing he was promoted to the rank of MAJ/O-4 effective and with a DOR of 1 March 2010 and

	b.  granting him Federal recognition in the rank of MAJ/O-4 effective and with a DOR of 1 March 2010.

2.  As a result of the above corrections, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service shall be notified of the Board's determination to remit all back pay (i.e., pay and allowances, less any withholdings and/or deductions) that may be due as a result of the correction.



      _________________________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110006352



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110006352



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021115

    Original file (20100021115.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 August 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100021115 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He was transferred from the USAR to the North Carolina ARNG (NCARNG) in the rank of CPT and executed an oath of office on 28 June 2007. This memorandum states that ARNG officers recommended for promotion to the grades of CPT through lieutenant colonel mobilized under Title 10, U.S. Code , and who are on an approved mandatory selection board promotion list who reach their...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013026

    Original file (20090013026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The advisory cites National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officers - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions), which states that the effective date of promotion for an ARNG commissioned officer who is promoted in the State is the date the Chief, NGB, extends Federal Recognition, unless otherwise provided by law. The advisory official states that in accordance with the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA), the effective date of promotion and DOR for an officer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028247

    Original file (20100028247.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. He was selected for State promotion in the Army National Guard (ARNG) with follow-on Federal recognition (FEDREC) orders, effective 27 May 2010. d. He states that DA promotion policy for officers selected for promotion who are mobilized provides for automatic eligibility for promotion by the date of the mobilization order. The State promoted the applicant to MAJ on 27 May 2010 while he was deployed. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024882

    Original file (20100024882.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * a memorandum of eligibility for promotion as a Reserve commissioned officer not on active duty, dated 21 January 2010 * a listing of the Fiscal Year 2009 (FY09) Reserve Component/Army Promotion List (RC/APL) LTC selection board results * a copy of National Guard Bureau (NGB) Special Orders Number 91 AR, dated 8 April 2003 (promotion to MAJ) * a copy of Orders 70-11, dated 11 March 2009 (release from attachment orders) * a copy of Orders 238-513, dated 26 August 2009...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014909

    Original file (20130014909.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains an NGB Form 62-E (Application for Federal Recognition as an Army National Guard Officer or Warrant Officer and Appointment as a Reserve Commissioned Officer or Warrant Officer of the ARNG of the United States (ARNGUS)), dated 15 May 2006, showing he requested appointment and Federal Recognition as a second lieutenant (2LT) in the Aviation (AV) Branch. His primary concern was that he had been promotable for at least a year and that his chain of command had intended on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004378

    Original file (20120004378.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains a memorandum, subject: Recommendation for Promotion of MAJ (applicant's name), dated 10 February 2012, which contains the following: * under the provisions of chapter 8, National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officers-Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions), recommend the applicant be promoted in the ARNG * in the grade of LTC/O-5, UIC W39LAA, paragraph 052, line 01, Chief, Operations and Training * the officer has demonstrated the required fitness for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017888

    Original file (20090017888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show the effective date and date of rank (DOR) for his promotion to captain (CPT)/pay grade O-3 was 12 September 2008 and payment of all pay and allowances due as a result of this correction. He states he assumed command of Company D, 3rd Battalion, 144th Infantry, on 23 February 2009; however, he was not promoted until 16 September 2009. c. He states it is unjust that he assumed the responsibility of a company commander without being...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004501

    Original file (20120004501.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The J1 noted that both officers had been selected for promotion by the State Federal Recognition Board and the error in not processing their promotions to the NGB in a timely manner lay solely with the G1 section, not the officers. In view of the foregoing, especially considering the NGB advisory opinion's recommendation, it would be appropriate at this time to correct the applicant's records to show his State promotion packet was submitted in a timely manner and the applicant was extended...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008207

    Original file (20090008207.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    p. HQ, NGB, Arlington, VA, memorandum, dated 23 March 2009, subject: Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army, that shows, in pertinent part, the applicant was promoted to the rank of LTC, effective and with a DOR of 23 March 2009. q. HQ, NGB, Washington, DC, Special Orders Number 65 AR, dated 23 March 2009, that show, in pertinent part, the NGB extended Federal recognition in the ARNG of the applicant’s promotion to LTC, effective 23 March 2009. The evidence of record shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007180

    Original file (20140007180.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * Memorandum, Subject: Promotion from CPT to MAJ (applicant's name and social security number (SSN)), dated 18 April 2014 * Orders 464-006, dated 29 December 2006, transferring him to a position of Team Chief * Amendment Orders 401-007, dated 5 January 2007 * IDARNG Element, Joint Force Headquarters - Table of Distribution and Allowances (TDA) * Memorandum, Subject: Eligibility for Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer Not on Active Duty, dated 3 July 2007 * DA Form 199...