Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006270
Original file (20110006270.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  24 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110006270 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests promotion to the rank/grade of lieutenant colonel (LTC)/O-5 and retirement in that rank.

2.  The applicant states the Army was unsuccessful in conducting his promotion processes and it required review by special selection boards (SSBs).  He goes on to state he was selected by an SSB for promotion to LTC, but he retired on
1 February 2010 before the promotion orders could be published.  He was subsequently notified that because he had retired he could not be promoted.

3.  The applicant provides copies of emails from officials at the Human Resources Command (HRC) notifying him he had been selected for promotion but he could not be promoted because he had retired.  They also advised him to apply to this Board.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was commissioned and ordered to active duty as a second lieutenant on 22 February 1989.  He was promoted to the rank of captain in the Regular Army on 1 June 1993.

2.  On 15 January 2001 he was honorably discharged due to non-selection for permanent promotion.  He had served 11 years, 10 months, and 24 days of active service.  He accepted a Reserve appointment and he was assigned to 


the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Individual Ready Reserve).  He was promoted to the rank of major (MAJ) on 20 August 2002.

3.  On 4 January 2005, he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.  On 23 April 2009, a memorandum was dispatched to the applicant informing him he had been selected by an SSB for promotion to major, effective 27 June 2001.  He served until 3 May 2008 when he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) due to completion of required service.  He had completed 3 years and 4 months of active service this period.

4.  On 4 May 2008, he was again ordered to active duty in the rank of major to obtain 20 years of active Federal service under the extended active duty sanctuary program.  His orders directed he remain on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL).

5.  On 31 January 2010, he was honorably REFRAD and he was transferred to the Retired List in the rank of MAJ effective 1 February 2010.  He had served 20 years and 5 days of active service.

6.  On 14 July 2010, the applicant was advised by officials at HRC that he had been selected for promotion to LTC by an SSB; however, because he was retired and he was no longer in an active status (on the RASL), he could not be promoted.  He was advised to apply to this Board.

7.  During the processing of this case, officials at HRC, Fort Knox, KY advised a staff member of the Board that the applicant would have been promoted to the rank of LTC on 21 December 2007 if he was in an LTC position and 26 June 2008 if he was in a MAJ’s position.

8.  The RASL is a list required to be maintained that contains the names of all officers except warrant officers (including commissioned warrant officers) who are in an active status in a Reserve Component of the Army and are not on an Active Duty List (ADL).

9.  In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14317, if the officer is not on the RASL, the board will not be approved (unless the officer is placed back on the RASL by a directive from an appropriate authority such as the ABCMR).  In essence, there is no "approved" recommendation in the applicant’s case.

10.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14304, states that officers shall be placed in the promotion zone for that officer's grade and competitive category and shall be considered for promotion to the next higher grade by a promotion board far 


enough in advance of completing the years of service in grade specified so that, if the officer is recommended for promotion, the promotion may be effective on or before the date on which the officer will complete those years of service.  The maximum "years of service" for promotion to LTC is 7 years.

11.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14506, states each Reserve officer who holds the grade of MAJ who has failed of selection to the next higher grade for the second time and whose name is not on a list of officers recommended for promotion to the next higher grade shall be removed from the RASL on the first day of the month after the month in which the officer completes 20 years of commissioned service or the first day of the 7th month after the month in which the President approves the report of the board which considered the officer for the second time, unless retained as provided in, among other sections, section 14701.

12.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1370 (2)(a) provides that in order to be eligible for voluntary retirement under any provision of this title in a grade above MAJ, he/she must have served on active duty in that grade for not less than 3 years, except that the secretary of Defense may authorize the Secretary of a military department to reduce such period to a period not less than 2 years. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions have been noted and appear to have merit.  He should have been considered for promotion and apparently was not, as evidenced by the fact that two separate SSBs considered him for promotion and recommended him for promotion to the ranks of MAJ and LTC.

2.  However, the applicant was mandatorily retired on 31 January 2010 at 20 years of service under the sanctuary program before he could be promoted to the rank of LTC.

3.  Inasmuch as the circumstances in his case are unusual, it appears that unusual measures are required to ensure equity in his case in the least disruptive and simple manner.

4.  Accordingly, the applicant’s records should be corrected to show he was promoted to the rank of LTC on 21 December 2007 as if he was occupying an LTC position and that 1 year in grade was be waived in order for him to be retired in the rank of LTC.

5.  Additionally, he should be paid all back pay and allowances due as a result from this action.
BOARD VOTE:

__X___  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  Showing he met all eligibility criteria for promotion to the rank of LTC (e.g. being in an active status and assigned to an LTC position) effective 21 December 2007, and paying him all back pay and allowances that flow from this action;

	b.  Showing he was granted a 1-year waiver of the time in grade requirements for promotion to LTC in order to qualify for voluntary retirement; and

	c.  Amending his retirement orders and associated documents (DD Form 214, etc) to show he was retired in the rank of LTC on 31 January 2010, with a date of rank of 21 December 2007, and he was transferred to the Retired List in the rank of LTC on 1 February 2010.



      _________X______________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110006270



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110006270



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003972

    Original file (20110003972.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC) by the September 2005 Special Selection Board (SSB) with back pay and allowances and placement on the Retired List in the grade of LTC. However, despite being in the Retired Reserve, in 1993 he was considered for promotion to MAJ, but he was not selected. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Voiding Orders 08-036-00050, issued by Headquarters,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003421

    Original file (20130003421.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following: * Revocation of her retirement orders * Reinstatement on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) * Promotion consideration to lieutenant colonel (LTC) by a Special Selection Board (SSB) 2. Continuation for CPT and MAJ will normally be for 3 years from the approval date of the selective continuation board by which the officer is recommended for continuation. If selected, her records should be corrected to show she was continued in the Reserve until she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026100

    Original file (20100026100.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, * education waivers with consecutive promotion corrections due to the findings of Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Docket Number AR20070001144, dated 2 August 2007 * a 4-year extension of his mandatory removal date (MRD) to allow him to qualify for a 20-year nonregular retirement 2. On 2 August 2007, the ABCMR granted his request for correction of his records as follows: * determined his 19 April 1996 DA Form 5074-1-R was incorrect *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150011113

    Original file (20150011113.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 14 November 2013, in response to his petition to this Board for promotion consideration to LTC by an SSB, the Board granted him relief as follows: * submitting his records to an SSB for promotion consideration to LTC and if before promotion consideration he is removed from the RASL, correct his records by continuing the SSB * if selected for promotion, correct his records by voiding his removal from the RASL (retirement orders) and showing he met the eligibility criteria for promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020952

    Original file (20120020952.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was placed in the Retired Reserve after being twice non-selected for promotion to LTC only 4 years after being promoted to MAJ. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other Than General Officers) specifies that MAJ to LTC mandatory boards occur when an officer reaches 7 years TIG. d. ABCMR Docket Number AR20060014854, dated 17 January 2007, pertaining to his selection to MAJ by the SSB 2005SS12R7 adjourning on 4 November 2005 indicates the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012878

    Original file (20130012878.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on the foregoing, it would be in the interest of equity to grant the applicant a military educational waiver for the FY05 through FY12 LTC boards and send his records to an SSB for promotion consideration to LTC under the FY05 through FY12 promotion criteria. If he is selected for promotion to LTC, it would be appropriate to grant a military educational waiver for the applicable COL board and send his records to an SSB for promotion consideration under the applicable COL criteria. As...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030307

    Original file (20100030307.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The official added that although the applicant was a two time non-select for promotion to LTC which resulted in either his discharge or transfer to the Retired Reserve, he was placed on the Promotion Selection List, which according to Title 10, U.S. Code (USC), sections 14506 and 14701 would have allowed him to serve until he reached 24 years of commissioned service. Title 10, USC, section 14506 (Effect of failure of selection for promotion: Reserve MAJs of the Army) states, in pertinent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001045

    Original file (20130001045.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    As stated in the applicant's previous case, he was promoted in the ARNG and granted Federal recognition to the rank of MAJ with an effective date and a date of rank of 15 December 2006. In the previous Record of Proceedings, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Officer Promotions, HRC, who determined the applicant's ADOR of 2 April 2009 was the correct date. Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the date of rank of a Reserve commissioned officer (other than...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022351

    Original file (20120022351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he was selected for promotion to LTC in June 2012 and he was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 1 August 2012. Although the applicant was selected for promotion prior to his REFRAD from the AGR Program, the board was not approved until after his REFRAD, resulting in the applicant being a promotable LTC on the RASL. Evidence of record shows that on 30 January 2012 the applicant was notified by memorandum that the Secretary of the Army approved the SELCON Board recommendation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006343

    Original file (20110006343.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect: * adjustment of his mandatory removal date (MRD), from 31 August 2016 to 30 November 2019 * adjustment of his date of rank (DOR), from 17 December 2000 to 31 March 2004 2. The applicant states, in effect: a. he was reappointed and promoted in accordance with the provisions of the Wxxxxx lawsuit (Settlement Agreement, Lxxxx J. Wxxxxx vs. Fxxxxxx J. Hxxxxx, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army, U.S. District Court for the Western District of...