Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005601
Original file (20110005601.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  13 October 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110005601 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he was walking point in four foot tall grass and he hit a punji stake which hit his bone.  The medic treated him in the field because his platoon leader would not let him leave the field.  His platoon leader was later wounded.  He recently contacted his platoon leader through an annual reunion.  His platoon leader sent him a letter that had been submitted to the Human Resources Command (HRC) concerning the applicant's punji stake incident.   

3.  The applicant provides:

* a letter, dated 20 March 2011, that his former platoon leader submitted to HRC
* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He was inducted into the Army of the United States on 1 April 1969.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  He was assigned to Vietnam on 7 September 1969, and further assigned to Company B, 1st Battalion, 22nd Infantry in the Republic of Vietnam from
22 September 1969 to 2 September 1970.

4.  Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) is blank.

5.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show award of the Purple Heart.

6.  His service medical records were not available for review.  His name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty listing.

7.  On 31 March 1971, he was released from active duty.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 for this period of service does not show he was awarded the Purple Heart.  There are no orders in his Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) awarding him the Purple Heart.

8.  In a letter, dated 10 March 2011, his former platoon leader stated that during one of their combat missions the applicant "stepped into a punji pit and was impaled through the ankle, to the bone."  He had the medic treat the applicant so they could continue their high priority mission.

9.  An email from HRC states that on 16 August 2011 the applicant's former platoon leader was informed there was insufficient evidence to make a determination concerning the wounds stated in his letter.

10.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), chapter 9, of the version in effect at the time, stated that a brief description of wounds or injuries (including injury from gas) requiring medical treatment that were received through hostile or enemy action, including those requiring hospitalization, would be entered in item 40 of the DA Form 20.

11.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), then in effect, provided that the Purple Heart was awarded to any member of an Armed Force or any civilian national of the United States who while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services had been wounded, killed, or who had died as a result of a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 contains no entries and his name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty listing.

2.  The applicant and his former platoon leader both state the applicant was injured when he stepped on a punji stake and he was treated in the field by a medic.  However, there is no evidence the treatment was made a matter of official record.  His service medical records were not available for review.  

3.  In the absence of evidence showing he was wounded as result of hostile action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment was made a matter of official record there is an insufficient basis to award the Purple Heart in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_____X___  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005601



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005601



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027863

    Original file (20100027863.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows he served in Vietnam from 20 April 1970 to 16 June 1971. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing he was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the statement provided by the applicant alone is not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001963C070206

    Original file (20050001963C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant’s military personnel file does not contain any medical treatment documents and the applicant’s medical records were not available for review. The applicant’s DA Form 20 shows he was injured by a punji stake while serving in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009925

    Original file (20130009925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: * award of the Purple Heart for a combat wound in Vietnam in 1964 * award of the Purple Heart for a combat wound in Vietnam in 1969 * award of the Purple Heat for a punji stick combat injury in Vietnam * award of the Amphibious Landing Medal (i.e., the Arrowhead Device) 2. There are no medical records available. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011269

    Original file (20060011269.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060011269 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019067

    Original file (20140019067.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the original consideration of his case that occurred on 24 February 2000, the applicant submitted a medical statement indicating he had sustained an ear injury in October 1968 and in July 1999, officials from the Army's Personnel Command informed him that he was not authorized an award of the Purple Heart because his injury was considered accidental. Creditable witness statements indicate he received injuries from an enemy act (being blown off an APC due to a landmine explosion). As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089097C070403

    Original file (2003089097C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he received the PH on 30 September 1967. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 September 1965 for a period of 3 years. Based on the evidence in this case, the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show awards which were omitted through administrative error at the time the applicant was separated from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03099238C070212

    Original file (03099238C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 14 April 2003, in response to an inquiry from a Member of Congress (MC), the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) stated that the applicant was not listed as being wounded on the casualty report records, and that verification of entitlement to additional awards of the Purple Heart might be possible by obtaining unit morning reports and hospital admission listings, and that the applicant should contact the National Personnel Records Center for this information. There is no medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008104

    Original file (20080008104.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the available records which show the applicant was disqualified for this award. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the AGCM for the period 25 October 1966 through 1 October 1968 and to correction of his records to show the award of the AGCM (First Award). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the Purple Heart for wounds received as a result of hostile action in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016993

    Original file (20060016993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military medical records be corrected to show he was injured while serving in Vietnam. His DA Form 2-1 does not show an entry in Item 4 (Assignment Considerations) documenting any wound, injury, medical condition or physical defect. The instructions for Item 4 (Assignment Considerations) state, in pertinent part, for wounds enter a brief description of the wound or injury received (including chemical, biological, or radiological injury); the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003538C070205

    Original file (20060003538C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no medical records available which show the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action during his service in Vietnam. There is no reason to doubt the statements provided by the applicant’s former platoon leader, rifleman, and medic; however, without medical evidence verifying the applicant's wounding, there is an insufficient basis for award of the Purple Heart in this case. As a result, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are...