Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005403
Original file (20110005403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    15 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110005403 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show:

* he did not have an 84-day break in service
* he was issued active duty orders for the period 2 June through 24 August 2008
* he was issued a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period 2 June through 24 August 2008 with his correct periods of active duty and total service time
* his records were updated to show 30 years of total time in service for pay purposes and 20 years, 5 months, and 23 days of active duty service
* he was issued amended retirement orders reflecting 30 years and 3 days of total time in service and 20 years, 5 months, and 23 days of active duty service
* active duty and retirement payments for the adjusted service time
* his toe injury was in the line of duty and documented on his DD Form 261 (Report of Investigation Line of Duty and Misconduct Status) or Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care)

2.  The applicant states:

* he was accepted into the sanctuary program on 23 April 2008 under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code (USC), section 12686a, while serving on active duty for operational support (ADOS) orders in support of Operation Enduring Freedom
* he was involuntarily released from active duty (REFRAD) on 1 June 2008 while in sanctuary
* his REFRAD was a violation of law resulting in an improper and unauthorized 84-day break in service for the period 2 June through 24 August 2008
* he was issued a DD Form 214 with an effective date of 1 June 2008 with 18 years, 1 month, and 29 days of active Federal service
* he was not assigned to his sanctuary tour until 25 August 2008
* he lost approximately $30,867 in pay and benefits in 2008, causing a family hardship and depleting his savings 
* he should have credit for 20 years, 5 months, and 23 days of active service and his retirement credit should be 30 years and 3 days
* his retirement pay is based on 29 years of service and with a loss of $100 monthly
* he may be owed an increase in some portion of his active duty pay for the increased service time
* he fractured his toe during the 84-day period and a line-of-duty determination ruled that it was not in the line of duty since he was not on active duty at the time of the injury

* this injury will result in arthritis and should be included as a service- connected injury for future Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) coverage

* there is no evidence in his records that his involuntary REFRAD was recommended by the Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), and approved by the Secretary or his designee
* his REFRAD occurred due to an internal HRC policy

* the Senior Leadership Branch was required to assign him to an active duty colonel/O-6 position using the nominative assignments process which took 124 days to produce an assignment 
* the improper application of the HRC policy that resulted in the failure to comply with the provisions of Title 10, USC, section 12686(a), and governing Assistant Secretary of the Army for Manpower and Reserve Affairs (ASA M&RA) policy is an injustice
* the improper application of policy caused him to lose active duty medical line-of-duty protections

* HRC had the authority to assign him to a position prior to his REFRAD and he could have been assigned to the U.S. Special Operations Command
* governing policy states that "an HRC recommendation for REFRAD must be signed by the commander and will be forwarded through the Army G-1 (DAPE-MP) to the ASA M&RA for final approval/disapproval"
* the Department of the Army (DA) Personnel Policy Guidance (PPG) for Contingency Operations in Support of Global War on Terrorism (GWOT), paragraph 10-22 (Sanctuary/18-year Lock-in), supports his claim

3.  The applicant provides:

* self-authored statements
* DD Form 214
* HRC sanctuary eligibility status letter, dated 23 April 2008
* service time summary printouts
* extract of Title 10, USC, chapter 1221, section 12686,
* ASA M&RA letter, dated 11 August 2008, subject:  Management of Reserve Component (RC) Soldiers Retained on Active Duty for Sanctuary
* extract of the DA PPG for Contingency Operations in Support of GWOT, dated 13 February 2008
* retirement orders
* active duty orders
* extract of Title 10, USC, chapter 1209, section 12301

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is a retired U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) colonel with a retirement effective date of 1 October 2010.

2.  His retirement orders show he was credited with 29 years, 9 months, and 9 days of service for pay purposes and he completed 20 years, 2 months, and 29 days of total active duty service.

3.  While the applicant was serving on ADOS on 23 April 2008, his command was notified by HRC that he had attained sanctuary eligibility status.  The notification stated, "As of 29 June 2008, the applicant would have 18 years, 2 months, and 27 days of active Federal service.  Soldier is required to take 14 to 20 days of transitional leave before leaving mobilization status.  Contact our office once you report to the demobilization site."  

4.  The HRC notification continued, "Early demobilization may cause a Soldier to lose their [sic] eligibility status for sanctuary.  We will not be able to release the order until the DD Form 214 and REFRAD order is cut at the transition center and forwarded to this office."  Additionally, Soldiers are advised to submit their packet for sanctuary about 120 days prior to their demobilization date.  Once approved for sanctuary, Soldiers are eligible for world-wide assignment based on the needs of the Army.  Soldiers are advised that a break in service will occur if actions are not accomplished in a timely manner.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 June 2008 shows he was REFRAD and had over 18 years of active service at the time of his separation.

6.  Item 18 (Remarks) of the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 June 2008 shows he served in Afghanistan during the period 22 July 2006 through 27 April 2008.

7.  The applicant did not provide a copy of his notice of sanctuary status or Sanctuary Notice Checklist to the Commander, HRC.

8.  There is no record of an HRC recommendation or ASA M&RA approval/
disapproval.

9.  On 25 August 2008, he was ordered to active duty for a period of 675 days with a projected end date of 30 June 2010 to obtain 20 years of active Federal service under the extended active duty sanctuary program.  

10.  His records contain a DD Form 214 showing he was released from active duty effective 21 September 2010.  He completed 2 years and 27 days of active service during this period.

11.  On 24 September 2010, he was reassigned to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) effective the same date.

12.  On 1 October 2010, the applicant was retired and placed on the Retired List in the rank of colonel.  He completed a total of 29 years, 9 months, and 9 days for basic pay purposes.  He was credited with 20 years, 2 months, and 29 days of total active duty service.  

13.  The applicant did not provide any documentation pertaining to his toe injury.  

14.  DA PPG for Contingency Operations in Support of GWOT, dated 13 February 2008, paragraph 10-22, states Soldiers eligible for retention on active duty pursuant to Title 10, USC, section 12686, at the end of such period of active duty must be voluntarily retained on active duty pursuant to Title 10, USC, section 12301(d), if they so choose.

15.  Title 10, USC, section 12686(a), states, under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary concerned, a member of an RC who is on active duty (other than for training) and is within 2 years of becoming eligible for retired pay under a purely military retirement system may not be involuntarily REFRAD before he or she becomes eligible for that pay unless the release is approved by the Secretary.

16.  A memorandum from ASA M&RA, dated 11 August 2008, subject:  Management of RC Soldiers Retained on Active Duty for Sanctuary, states a Reserve Soldier on active duty who has attained 18 years or more (but less than 20 years) of active service must forward a notice of sanctuary status to the Commander, HRC, ATTN:  AHRC-PLM-O, through his or her chain of command.  The notice must include all the documents on the Sanctuary Notice Checklist to substantiate the Soldier's eligibility for sanctuary.  The notice must be received by HRC 120 days prior to the end date of the Soldier's orders.  When the Commander, HRC, does not support the Soldier's retention on active duty for sanctuary, the Soldier's notice must be forwarded to the Army G-1 with HRC justification for REFRAD.  An HRC recommendation for REFRAD must be signed by the commander and will be forwarded through the Army G-1 to the ASA M&RA for final approval/disapproval.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's requests were carefully considered.

2.  Although the applicant was REFRAD on 1 June 2008 with over 18 years of service, he has not provided sufficient evidence showing he submitted a packet for sanctuary prior to his separation date.  The sanctuary eligibility letter clearly states certain requirements must be completed or there is the risk of a break in service.  The 14 to 20 days of transitional leave is used to locate an assignment and publish permanent change of station orders.  

3.  It is true that Title 10, USC, section 12686(a), states a member of an RC who is on active duty and is within 2 years of becoming eligible for retired pay under a purely military retirement system may not be involuntarily REFRAD before he or she becomes eligible for that pay unless the release is approved by the Secretary.  However, it also states, “under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary concerned.”  

4.  The Army’s regulatory guidance is the DA PPG, which states Soldiers eligible for retention on active duty pursuant to Title 10, USC, section 12686, at the end of such period of active duty must be voluntarily retained on active duty if they so choose.
5.  The applicant has not shown he accomplished those requirements to request retention on active duty in a timely fashion or that his break in service was the result of an administrative error by the Army.

6.  Records show the applicant was subsequently ordered to active duty after his REFRAD to obtain 20 years of active Federal service under the extended active duty sanctuary program and he was allowed to serve until he reached retirement eligibility.  Therefore, the presumption of regularity exists and the applicant has not shown an error or injustice to the satisfaction of the Board.

7.  Although the applicant desires to have his fractured toe injury found to be in the line of duty for future VA claims, the accident occurred while he was not on active duty.

8.  There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant did not provide any evidence which shows his REFRAD, break in service, and ultimate retirement was in error or unjust.  Absent such evidence, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X__________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005403



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005403



6


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005637

    Original file (20110005637.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 July 2003, his commander recommended approval of the applicant's request to be released from active duty in order to report to active duty under the AGR program. A review of his official military personnel file (OMPF) and previous applications submitted to this board show the applicant was assigned to the USAR Command, St. Louis, MO, and further attached to the USAR Command, B Company, U.S. Army Garrison, in an AGR status with a report date of 13 August 2003. In order to preclude...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017577

    Original file (20080017577.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: April 2008 Senior Enlisted Promotion Board Recommended List; 88th RRC Promotion/Position Assignment Notification (electronic mail (e-mail)), dated 25 July 2008; Department of the Army, Office of the Assistant Secretary Manpower and Reserve Affairs (ASA & MRA) dated 28 June 2006, Subject: Promotion Policies for Reserve Component (RC) Enlisted Soldiers on Active Duty for Operational Support (ADOS) in Excess of 12...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014334

    Original file (20110014334.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record shows the applicant was ordered to active duty from retired status and served on active duty in support of Operation Noble Eagle and Enduring Freedom from 1 October 2006 through 18 June 2009. Soldiers unable to utilize accrued PDMRA days during their current mobilization order may be voluntarily retained on active duty under the provisions of Title 10 USC section 12301(d), Contingency Operations-Active Duty for Operational Support orders (CO-ADOS), to utilize accrued PDMRA days. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009301

    Original file (20130009301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 12686a states that under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary concerned, which shall be as uniform as practicable, a member of a Reserve Component (RC) who is on active duty (other than for training) and is within 2 years of becoming eligible for retired pay or retainer pay under a purely military retirement system (other than the retirement system under chapter 1223 of this title), may not be involuntarily released from that duty before he becomes...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017723

    Original file (20100017723.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During his USAR service, he was periodically called to active duty, but only for the purposes of active duty for training (ADT) and active duty for special work (ADSW). Per Army Regulation 135-200, the applicant would have completed a DA Form 1058-R each time he returned to active duty acknowledging that the active duty service would not qualify him for a 20-year retirement. The applicant's delay (15 years in the applicant's current case and 3 years in his original case) in filing his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010397

    Original file (20130010397.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record is void of any documentary evidence to show he requested and was denied PDMRA during the 5 February 2011 through 4 February 2012 period of active duty in which it was earned, or that he requested to be extended on active duty to use the earned PDMRA. The applicant's Title 10, USC, section 12302 mobilization order period of 5 February 2011 through 4 February 2012 would be considered as a qualifying mobilization for PDMRA. Since there is no tracking mechanism, it is impossible to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110013493

    Original file (AR20110013493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests cash reimbursement for Post Deployment/Mobilization Respite Absence (PDMRA) days earned during his period of active duty from 1 October 2006 through 28 March 2008. The applicant's record shows he served on active duty from 9 September 2006 through 2 June 2008, while a member of the United States Army Reserve (USAR). However, other than the special authority to monetarily compensate Soldiers who were REFRAD between authorization for the PDMRA program on 19 January...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020107

    Original file (20130020107.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 April 2013, HRC disapproved his request for PDMRA under GA2 and opined that the applicant was not eligible for PDMRA benefits because the law governing PDMRA benefits required that a minimum of 50% of time be spent with boots on the ground in Afghanistan, Iraq, or Kuwait. Although the applicant has not provided any evidence to show that he was unaware of or not properly counseled in regard to PDMRA, it does not appear that he was entitled to accrue PDMRA benefits during his deployment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013266

    Original file (20130013266.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. The applicant's mobilization order period of 3 January 2011 through 26 December 2011 under the authority of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12302 would be considered as a qualifying mobilization for PDMRA. e. Because there is no tracking system, it is impossible to determine whether the applicant used earned PDMRA days during or after his mobilization period in 2011. f. The applicant does not qualify for PDMRA cash reimbursement under the Gray Area II legislative authority which covers...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022988

    Original file (20110022988.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * the FSM served on active duty from 1 January 2007 through 23 October 2008 (about 22 months) with a few weeks break * he had moles removed and a biopsy for skin cancer while on active duty * he was informed that the biopsy reports would be available soon after his release from active duty * the report was lost and within 1 year he went from having moles to having stage 4 cancer * the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) granted him service connected compensation at the...