Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005029
Original file (20110005029.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 October 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110005029 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states he was never disciplined during his service and he separated under the Voluntary Early Release Program (VERP).  He was assured that it would not affect him negatively in any way.  Accordingly, he should have been awarded the AGCM.

3.  The applicant provides:

* copies of training certificates
* his award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM)
* his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 

substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 October 1992 for a period of 2 years and 17 weeks.  He completed his one-station unit training as an indirect fire infantryman at Fort Benning, GA.  He was transferred to Korea on 16 March 1993.

3.  He completed his tour in Korea on 12 March 1994 and he was transferred to Fort Carson, CO where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 20 December 1994 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 16-8 and the VERP due to reduction in force.  He served 2 years, 1 month, and 22 days of creditable active service.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the:

* Army Commendation Medal
* National Defense Service Medal
* Army Lapel Button
* Army Service Ribbon
* Overseas Service Ribbon

4.  A review of his official record shows no derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the AGCM.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the AGCM, disqualification must be justified.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea.  The period of eligibility is 28 July 1954 to a date to be determined by the Secretary of Defense.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions have been noted and appear to have merit.

2.  After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it appears that the applicant should have received the first award of the AGCM for his service from 29 October 1992 through 20 December 1994.  This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving this award.

3.  The evidence suggests that the applicant not receiving the AGCM was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of his unit commanders.  Therefore, in the interest of justice, the applicant should be awarded the AGCM at this time and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

4.  Additionally, the applicant served during a qualifying period of service for entitlement to the KDSM.  Accordingly, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

__X_____  ___X____  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period
29 October 1992 through 20 December 1994, and

	b.  adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 the:

* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Korea Defense Service Medal



      _______ _X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005029



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005029



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028849

    Original file (20100028849.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests to be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the AGCM and Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). The evidence shows the applicant served on active duty in the Republic of Korea during a designated period of time to qualify for award of the KDSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006572

    Original file (20130006572.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 July 1998 to show award of the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM), Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), and Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal (NMCAM). The applicant states the MSM and NMCAM were not received until after his retirement date. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006737

    Original file (20120006737.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003888

    Original file (20090003888.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-20 of the awards regulation provides that the KDSM is authorized to be awarded to members who served on active duty in Korea for 30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days after 28 July 1954 to a date to be determined. As a result, given the applicant did not serve in Korea during the qualifying period, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting this portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017738

    Original file (20140017738.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002123

    Original file (20130002123.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    For item 13, list awards and decorations for all periods of service in the priority sequence specified in Army Regulation 600-8-22. c. For item 18 for an active duty Soldier deployed with his or her unit during their continuous period of active service, enter "SERVICE IN (name of country deployed) FROM (inclusive dates for example, YYYYMMDD-YYYYMMDD)." The evidence of record shows the applicant qualified for award of the KDSM based on his active service in support of the defense of the ROK....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005893

    Original file (20110005893.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018300C070206

    Original file (20050018300C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) he was awarded for the period 1 November 1993 through 31 October 2003 and the 7th Award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) he was entitled to based on his 21 years of honorable active duty service were erroneously omitted from the list of awards contained in Item 13 of his final DD Form 214. It also contains a second MSM Award Certificate that verifies he was awarded the MSM for meritorious service from 1 November 1993...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008361

    Original file (20130008361.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was not awarded the AGCM and he was never in any trouble during his 3 years of service. Therefore, he should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 17 September 1969 through 16 September 1972 and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 17 September 1969 through 16 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007949

    Original file (20130007949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his service in Korea and his award of the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). Army Regulation 600-8-22 also states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...