Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004959
Original file (20110004959.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  4 October 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110004959 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was medically discharged.

2.  The applicant states he was discharged because he did not meet medical fitness standards at the time of enlistment.  However, the real reason he was discharged was due to a tank accident at the "wash out" facility.  After the accident he saw a doctor who told him that due to the accident, both his night vision and color vision were damaged.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 


has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military personnel records do not contain a copy of his entrance medical examination, i.e., Standard Form (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination).

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 2 May 1972.

4.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center, Infantry, Fort Ord, CA, Special Orders Number 182, dated 30 June 1972, as amended by Headquarters, U.S. Army Armor Center, Fort Knox, KY, Special Orders Number 151, dated 14 July 1972, assigned the applicant to Company A, 3rd Battalion, 1st Advanced Individual Training Brigade, Fort Knox, KY, on 14 July 1972, for further training in military occupational specialty 11E (Armor Crewman).

5.  An SF 93 (Report of Medical History) completed by the applicant shows in:

   a.  item 11 (Have you ever had or have you now?), in response to the entry for "Eye trouble" the applicant indicated "Yes";

   b.  item 19 (Have you ever been a patient in any type of hospitals?), the applicant indicated "Yes" and entered "Ireland Hospital, 22 August 1972, Fort Knox, Bad Eyes, Dr. Nevins.  Med. 200 for bad eyes";

   c.  the "Notes" section the medical doctor entered [item 11] "Eye trouble - color blindness [indecipherable]" and "[item] 19 - Noted"; and

   d.  the examining physician placed his signature on this document on
23 August 1972.

6.  A DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form), dated 22 August 1972, subject:  Application for Separation from Service by Reason of Erroneous Enlistment or Induction, shows the applicant was advised that a medical examination revealed a medical condition which would have permanently disqualified him for entry in the military service had it been detected at that time and it does not disqualify him from retention in the military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 


40-501 [Standards of Medical Fitness], Chapter 3 [Medical Fitness Standards for Retention and Separation, Including Retirement]:

   a.  it also shows he was advised that the approved medical board confirmed the findings of the examining physician and that he could apply for separation due to having been erroneously enlisted;

   b.  he certified he was counseled as to his rights and that he fully understood his rights; and

   c.  the applicant placed his signature on the application for separation by reason of erroneous enlistment.

7.  On 28 August 1972, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-9, based on erroneous enlistment.

8.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Armor Center, Fort Knox, KY, Special Orders Number 184, dated 29 August 1972, discharged the applicant from the U.S. Army based on medical reasons, effective 30 August 1972.

9.  A DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows the applicant was honorably discharged on 30 August 1972.  He completed 3 months and 29 days of net active service:

   a.  item 11c (Reason and Authority) shows he was discharged "because of not meeting medical fitness standards at time of enlistment" under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200; and 

	b.  item 32 (Signature of Person Being Transferred or Discharged) shows the applicant placed his signature on the document.

10.  Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 5 (Separation for Convenience of the Government), paragraph 5-9, provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for induction or initial enlistment will be discharged when a medical board, regardless of the date completed, establishes that a medical condition was identified by appropriate military medical authority within four months of the 


member's initial entrance on active duty or active duty for training under the Reserve Enlistment Program of 1963, which would have permanently disqualified him for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and does not disqualify him for retention in the military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show he was medically discharged as a result of an injury he sustained while on active duty.
2.  The applicant's contention was carefully considered, however:

   a.  there is no evidence of record, and the applicant provides insufficient evidence, that shows his eye condition was the result of an accident at a tank "wash out" facility;

	b.  the applicant applied for separation from military service by reason of having been erroneously enlisted based on a medical condition which would have permanently disqualified him from entry into military service; and

	c.  accordingly, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-9, for failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards at time of enlistment.

3.  Records confirm the applicant's separation was administratively correct and in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time.

4.  In view of all of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004959



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004959



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001914

    Original file (20080001914.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was unjustly discharged for defective vision that existed prior to service (EPTS) when in fact he should have been medically retired because he was injured on active duty. The applicant agreed with the boards findings and recommendations on 4 December 1967 and on the same day submitted an application for expeditious discharge by reason of physical disability - EPTS. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01097

    Original file (PD2011-01097.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    VA (20050523) – All Effective Date 20010704* Condition Posttraumatic Arthritis, Right Ankle Ganglion Cyst, Right Wrist Chronic Scapholunate Dissociation w/Instability, Right Wrist Chronic Scapholunate Dissociation…, Left Wrist Hypertension Excision, Nevus, Residual Scar… Not Service Connected No VA Entry Sinusitis Tonsillitis Paresthesias of Gingiva… Vitreous Floaters DDD, L5-S1; Schmorl’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03448

    Original file (BC-2012-03448.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012- 03448 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Flying Class I (FCI) physical, dated 27 November 2006, be corrected or removed from his record. During his FCI physical, he passed the color vision exam required of all FCI, FCIA, and FCIII applicants. The complete SGAT evaluation is at...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013993

    Original file (AR20070013993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100016681

    Original file (AR20100016681.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, DD Form 149, NGB Form 22, and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012265

    Original file (AR20060012265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 02 Mos, 06 Days ????? His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5-11, AR 635-200 by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards, with service uncharacterized. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019747

    Original file (20140019747.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The physician's review and analysis of the TSGLI application is summarized below: * the physician thoroughly reviewed the case in the Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application (AHLTA) which contained more medical notes and documents than the applicant submitted in support of his claim * only one eye examination not prior to the claimed traumatic event was recorded in AHLTA, written on 20 August 2007, documenting his hypermetropia (one eye with significantly worse vision than...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010956

    Original file (20080010956.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further confirmed that he understood that he was entitled to the same consideration and processing as any other member of the Army who was separated by reason of physical disability which, in effect, included separation processing through medical channels (Physical Disability Evaluation System-(PDES)). The evidence of record confirms and the applicant admitted that his pre-existing eye condition disqualified him for enlistment (twice), and that this eye condition did in fact exist prior...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015658

    Original file (20100015658.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a discharge from the military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-9 because he did not meet the medical fitness standards at the time of his induction as prescribed by Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 2. Paragraph 5-9 provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entrance on active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005920

    Original file (20120005920.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 38 (Record of Assignments) – assignments in the 25th Infantry Division and the 720th Military Police Battalion between 13 September 1970 and 29 August 1971 when he returned to the United States for separation and transfer to the U.S. Army Reserve as a specialist four (pay grade E-4); b. item 41 (Awards and Decorations) – the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Bronze Star Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign...