Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004916
Original file (20110004916.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110004916 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD).

2.  The applicant states he believes the general court-martial (GCM) was unjust and harsh.  He states the judgment of 4 December 1978 was inequitable, and he received unjust and harsh punishment without the benefit of mental health counseling.

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored statement and the attachments identified therein in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 February 1976 and was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty 13B (Field Artillery Crewman).  His record shows he was advanced to the rank of private first class/E-3 on 15 February 1977 and this is the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty.  It also shows he earned the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar and Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Hand Grenade Bar.  His record documents no acts of valor or significant achievement.

3.  The applicant's disciplinary history includes his acceptance of nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on 26 August 1978 for wrongfully possessing marijuana.  His punishment for this offense included a reduction to private/E-2.

4.  The applicant's record contains a Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination) completed on 14 August 1978.  It shows the applicant received a "normal" psychiatric evaluation in the clinical evaluation portion of the medical examination.  The Standard Form 88 further shows the applicant received a physical profile of "111111" and he was determined to be medically qualified for retention and/or separation by the examining physician.  There are no disabling physical or mental conditions noted on the form.

5.  On 4 December 1978, a GCM found the applicant guilty pursuant to his pleas of violating Article 92 of the UCMJ by violating a general regulation by wrongfully possessing a hypodermic needle with hypodermic syringe and of the following four specifications of violating Article 134 of the UCMJ by wrongfully possessing heroin on or about 4 October 1978, wrongfully possessing marijuana on or about 19 August 1978, wrongfully selling marijuana on or about 19 August 1978, and wrongfully transferring marijuana on or about 19 August 1978.  The resulting sentence was a BCD, confinement at hard labor for 7 months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to private/E-1.

6.  GCM Order Number 109, Headquarters, 3rd Infantry Division, dated 21 December 1978, shows the sentence adjudged on 4 December 1978 was approved by the GCM convening authority.

7.  On 28 June 1979, the U.S. Army Court of Military Review held the findings of guilty and the sentence as approved by the convening authority correct in law and fact and accordingly affirmed them.

8.  On 11 October 1979, Headquarters, U.S. Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, GCM Order Number 546 directed that Article 71c having been complied with, the BCD portion of the applicant's sentence be duly executed.

9.  On 1 November 1979, the applicant was discharged by reason of court-martial with a BCD under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations).  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed a total of 3 years, 3 months, and 11 days of creditable active military service and accrued 163 days of lost time due to imprisonment.

10.  The applicant provides supporting statements from his sister and an Army chaplain who served with him in Germany.  They both attest to his good post-service conduct.  He also provides a letter from his mother to a Member of Congress, dated 3 November 1978.  In this letter, his mother recounts the applicant's drug use and the events leading to her request that the applicant be granted a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, and be discharged in lieu of trial by court-martial

11.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 11 of the version of regulation in effect at the time prescribed the policies and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or BCD.  It stipulated that a Soldier would be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a GCM or special court-martial and that the appellate review must be completed and affirmed before the sentence is ordered duly executed.

12.  Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process.  In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction.  Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.  Clemency is an act of mercy or instance of leniency to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his BCD was unjust and too harsh has been carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.

2.  By law, any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction under the UCMJ is prohibited.  The Board is only empowered to change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate to moderate the severity of the sentence imposed.  The evidence of record reveals no error or injustice related to the applicant's court-martial and/or his subsequent discharge.

3.  Further, the record confirms the applicant underwent a complete separation medical examination that confirmed he suffered from no disabling physical or mental condition.  Notwithstanding his good post-service conduct as outlined in the supporting statements provided with his application, based on the gravity of the offenses resulting in his court-martial conviction and BCD, his overall record of service is not sufficiently meritorious to support clemency and/or an upgrade of his discharge.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004916



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004916



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019444

    Original file (20080019444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant served in Vietnam from on or about 14 July 1969 to 2 January 1971. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003137

    Original file (20090003137.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued to the applicant on the date of his discharge shows that he was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 11-2, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel) after completing a total of 3 years, 9 months, and 17 days of creditable active military service and accruing 577 days of time lost due to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010269

    Original file (20070010269.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was accordingly discharged from military service on 28 May 1981. The DD Form 214 he was issued confirms that he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 11 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) with a bad conduct discharge as a result of Court-Martial. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012704

    Original file (20080012704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records do not show any significant acts of valor during his military service. This form further shows the applicant's character of service as bad conduct and that he completed 1 year, 1 month, and 23 days of creditable military service, and 68 days of lost time. On 7 December 1981, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001189

    Original file (20090001189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DA Form 201 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he served in Germany from 25 January 1978 through 9 March 1979, and earned no individual awards or decorations during his active duty tenure. In accordance with Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010562

    Original file (20100010562.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provided that a general discharge was a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it was issued to a Soldier whose military record was satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010942

    Original file (20130010942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 February 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130010942 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. A Standard Form 600, dated 5 April 1976, shows the applicant was determined to be a rehabilitation failure as directed by the unit commander. On 21 December 1977, the applicant was discharged in accordance with his affirmed sentence under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 11-2.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020162

    Original file (20090020162.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 31 March 1981, the convening authority approved a lesser sentence of confinement at hard labor for 45 days, a forfeiture of $334.00 pay per month for 6 months, and a bad conduct discharge, and except for that part of the sentence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017013

    Original file (20070017013.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction. However, there is no evidence that indicates the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service. As a result, there is insufficient basis to upgrade the applicant's discharge to an honorable or a general discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000229

    Original file (20110000229.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to honorable. The applicant provides no additional evidence. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged with a bad conduct discharge on 11 May 1979 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11, as a result of court-martial.