Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004555
Original file (20110004555.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  18 October 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110004555 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and all awards he is entitled to receive be added to his 26 March 1970 DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). 

2.  He states the above award was accidentally omitted from his DD Form 214.

3.  He provides the following:

* Permanent Orders 199-5 and the AAM certificate for the period August through October 1984
* DD Forms 214
* Armed Forces of the United States Identification Card

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 
1 March 1966 and he completed 1 year, 1 month, and 10 days of active military service.  On 10 April 1967, he was discharged to accept an appointment as a commissioned officer.  On 11 April 1967, he was appointed as a Reserve Commissioned Officer in the rank of second lieutenant.  He was honorably released from active duty on 26 March 1970.

3.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Forms 214 shows the following:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal (VSM)
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Air Medal
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)

4.  Item 30 (Remarks) of his 26 March 1970 DD Form 214 shows he served in Vietnam from 16 April 1969 to 23 March 1970.

5.  A copy of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) or DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) is not contained in his available records.  

6.  He provided Permanent Orders 199-5, dated 24 October 1984, and an AAM certificate that show he was awarded the AAM for the period 27 August to
26 October 1984.

7.  The Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to all units that served in Vietnam between 20 July 1965 and 28 March 1973 which were subordinate to Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam by Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated 1974.

8.  Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the VSM for participation in each campaign.  His records indicate he participated in the following campaigns:
* 
Tet 69/Counteroffensive (23 February 1969 - 8 June 1969)
* Vietnam Summer - Fall 1969 (9 June 1969 - 31 October 1969)
* Vietnam Winter - Spring 1970 (1 November 1969 - 30 April 1970)

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Evidence of record shows the applicant was not awarded the AAM until October 1984, 14 years after the issuance of his 26 March 1970 DD Form 214.   Therefore, there is no basis for granting this portion of his request.

2.  The evidence of record shows he is entitled to wear the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

3.  The available evidence also shows he participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show three bronze service stars to be worn on his already-awarded VSM.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  deleting from item 24 of his 26 March 1970 DD Form 214 the VSM; and

   b.  adding to item 24 of his 26 March 1970 DD Form 214 the VSM with three bronze service stars and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.
    
2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the AAM.



      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004555



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004555



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063928C070421

    Original file (2001063928C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was improperly awarded a MUC-AFL at the time of his separation. Accordingly, he should be awarded that award and his record corrected accordingly. The applicant was improperly issued an AAM for his service; however, the AAM did not exist at the time the applicant served and was not authorized for issuance until approximately 10 years later.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010371

    Original file (20140010371.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests to have award orders filed in his official military personnel file (OMPF) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following awards: * Bronze Star Medal (BSM) (3rd Award) with "V" Device * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * RVN Gallantry Cross with Silver Star 2. His records do not contain and he does not provide any evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000375

    Original file (20110000375.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 16 June 1970 to show one award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) instead of two awards of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant states: * Item 24 (Decorations, Medal, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 16 June 1970 shows the entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011927

    Original file (20110011927.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he should be awarded the first award of the AGCM for the period 10 December 1968 through 12 July 1970 and his records should be corrected to show this award. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 10 December 1968 through 12 July 1970; b. correcting his SSN to read...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019135

    Original file (20100019135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) provides for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to all units that served in Vietnam between 20 July 1965 and 28 March 1973 which were subordinate to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 8, dated 1974. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001384

    Original file (20150001384.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: a. his secondary military occupational specialty (SMOS) as "M-60 Machine Gunner"; b. all awards to which he is entitled, to include: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions First Class Unit Citation Streamer embroidered "Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018519

    Original file (20130018519.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * his full name suffix was not entered on his DD Form 214 * he was awarded the CIB, two awards of the ARCOM, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, but they are not documented on his DD Form 214 * he is eligible for the AGCM, but it was not awarded * three bronze service stars are not listed on his DD Form 214 * the "60 Device" for the Vietnam Campaign Medal is not annotated * he is eligible for two awards of the Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006766

    Original file (20110006766.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, they should be added to his DD Form 214 at this time. Additionally, the applicant's unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during the period he served with the unit and he is entitled to have this award added to his DD Form 214 as well. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the following awards to item 26 of his DD Form 214: the NDSM, VSM with 3BSS,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004475

    Original file (20120004475.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar is authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. Army Regulation 635-5 states " all decorations, service medals, campaign credits, and badges awarded or authorized " will be shown on DD Form 214. Therefore, the entry in item 24 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 3 October 1972 should read the: * Silver Star (2nd Award) * Purple Heart (2nd Award) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023492

    Original file (20100023492.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. General orders awarded the applicant three awards of the BSM and only one is listed on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 12 March 1968...