Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004455
Original file (20110004455.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  13 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110004455 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his previously denied request that his lumbar spine injury be approved for Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) purposes.

2.  The applicant states in correspondence written to his congressman, in effect, that he injured his back while driving a High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV) on a 4-day drive from Camp Shelby, MS to Fort Leonard Wood, MO.

3.  The applicant provides:

* a self-authored statement
* extracts from his medical records 
* his CRSC application and decisional documents
* his previous ABCMR decisional document, Docket Number AR20090019690, dated 8 April 2010
* correspondence to and from the ABCMR

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090019690 on 8 April 2010.

2.  The applicant provides a new argument that he made to his congressional representative along with additional medical documentation which was not previously reviewed by this Board.  Therefore, it is considered new evidence and warrants consideration by the Board.

3.  The applicant contends his back injury occurred while training Soldiers on a HMMWV which is specifically designed for the military.  He claims the training was also for peace and simulations of war.  Further, he used the HMMV as a control vehicle in a military convoy.  

4.  The applicant was retired on 30 April 1994 by reason of sufficient service for retirement.

5.  On 10 February 2009, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency, CRSC Branch informed the applicant that none of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disabilities were CRSC qualifying conditions because there was no evidence to show a combat-related event caused any of those conditions.

6.  CRSC, as established by Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1413a, as amended, provides for the payment of the amount of money a military retiree would receive from the VA for combat-related disabilities if it wasn’t for the statutory prohibition for a military retiree to receive a VA disability pension.  Payment is made by the Military Department, not the VA, and is tax-free.  Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, especially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10 percent disabling.  For periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute was amended), members had to have disabilities for which they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10 percent disabled or who are rated at least 60 percent disabled as a direct result of armed conflict, especially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.

7.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) defines instrumentality of war as a device designed primarily for military service and intended for use in such service at the time of the occurrence of the injury.  It may also be a device not designed primarily for military service if 



use of or occurrence involving such a device subjects the individual to a hazard peculiar to military service.  This use or occurrence differs from the use or occurrence under similar circumstances in civilian pursuits.  There must be a direct causal relationship between the use of the instrumentality of war and the disability must be incurred incident to a hazard or risk of the service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The CRSC criteria is specifically for those military retirees who have combat- related disabilities.  Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC.  The military retiree must show that the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing especially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.

2.  The applicant stated that his back was injured when he was driving a HMMWV on a 4-day drive from Camp Shelby, MS to Fort Leonard Wood, MO. Again in this regard, there is no evidence to show his spine injury had a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war.
 
3.  In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence in which to grant his request.
 
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION










BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20090019690 dated 8 April 2010.




      ___________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004455



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004455



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019690

    Original file (20090019690.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, especially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001806

    Original file (20120001806.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB proceedings also stated "The Soldier's retirement is based on disability from injury or disease received in the line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war..." and "The disability did result from a combat related injury as defined in 26 U.S. Code 104." Department of Defense (DOD) guidance on CRSC states a combat-related disability is a disability with an assigned medical diagnosis code from the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities that was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015399

    Original file (20130015399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) for injuries he received on active duty during training simulating war and using an instrument of war. On 12 August 2005, the Special Actions Branch, CRSC Division, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), considered the applicant's claim for CSRC. The medical record he provided, dated 15 January 2013, offers insufficient evidence to support a claim to CRSC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011860

    Original file (20120011860.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he has been denied CRSC for a service connected disability three times; however, he now has evidence that shows his CRSC request should have been approved under "Instrumentality of War" provisions. Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for Reserve retirement at age 60) and who have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004657

    Original file (20130004657.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show: * all updates directed as a result of an approved recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) * all awards he is authorized * the appropriate entries on his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) to indicate he was retired due to a combat-related disability incurred in the line of duty (LOD) 2. As a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to amend the DA Form 199 to reflect the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009832

    Original file (20140009832.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's record is void of any evidence that shows his injuries were a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war. Although the evidence shows the applicant was diagnosed with Hypertensive Heart Disease, Degenerative Arthritis of the Cervical Spine, Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Syndrome with Thoracolumbar Degenerative Changes with Erectile Dysfunction, Healed Fracture; Left...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023266

    Original file (20110023266.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no documentation that shows he had an injury or disability which may have been combat-related or caused by an instrumentality of war. A determination that a disability is the result of an instrumentality of war may be made if the disability was incurred in any period of service as a result of such diverse causes as wounds caused by a military weapon, accidents involving a military combat vehicle, injury or sickness caused by fumes, gases, or explosion of military ordnance,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003688

    Original file (20150003688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was asked to provide evidence on how these conditions occurred, such as a line of duty investigation, medical documentation, and/or VA rating decision: * VASRD Code 5009, Arthritis, left knee, No evidence in his claim to show that a combat-related event caused this condition * VASRD Code 5099, Bone Condition, right knee, No evidence in his claim to show that a combat-related event caused this condition * VASRD Code 5201, Limited motion of arm, right shoulder, No evidence in his claim to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001842

    Original file (20140001842.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was told to apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). 24 March 1987, a medical evaluation board diagnosed him with a schizophrenia disorder and referred him to a physical evaluation board. Unfortunately, there is no evidence in the available record that shows these conditions were sustained as a direct result of armed conflict, especially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024695

    Original file (20110024695.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * His record should show a combat-related service condition for his knee disability * His knee injury occurred in 1968 during a simulated war exercise * His knee came into contact with his weapon while climbing into a foxhole during night live-fire exercises * He has met 3 out of 4 for combat-related special compensation * His record only shows service-connected injury * He was injured while in the Army but he retired from the U.S. Air Force Reserve (USAFR) * He...