Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004434
Original file (20110004434.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  12 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110004434 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests, in effect, his discharge from the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) be voided so he can be processed through the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES).

2.  The applicant states his discharge from the Army National Guard was erroneous because regulatory procedures were not followed.  He was given a permanent physical profile by way of a Fit-for-Duty Determination Board (FFDDB) but he was not afforded an opportunity to elect referral to the PDES for a proper medical determination of his condition to establish the proper disposition and his disability benefits.  He further states the condition for which he was declared unfit for retention was acquired while serving on active duty since he was treated and diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* two Line of Duty (LOD) determinations
* Purple Heart orders and award certificate
* his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 April 2004
* a December 2005 medical record
* an April 2006 medical record
* a DD Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated 30 April 2006
* his discharge orders and amendment
* 
a National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for the period ending 14 January 2008
* an email from the Chief, Health Service Support Branch, dated 27 June 2011
* a PRARNG memorandum, dated 2 March 2011

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's service medical and dental records are believed to be on permanent loan to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) or in the possession of the PRARNG and are not available for review.

3.  The applicant's NGB Form 22 shows he served in the PRARNG from 6 June 2001 through 14 January 2008.  On 18 January 2003, he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Enduring/Iraqi Freedom.  He served in Jordan and Iraq from 10 March 2003 through 4 March 2004.

4.  The applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received as a result of enemy or hostile action on 31 October 2003.

5.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 18 April 2004 at the completion of required active service.

6.  A 12 December 2005 medical record completed by a VA physician shows the applicant was evaluated to determine if he should return to active service due to psychiatric problems.  The diagnosis was shown as PTSD.  It was recommended the applicant not handle firearms and that he not return to active service as it would be detrimental to his psychological wellbeing.


7.  A 30 April 2006 medical record shows the applicant has disability evaluations for PTSD at 30 percent (%) and for a scar and right ear condition at 20% (presumably from the VA).  He was also placed on a permanent profile for these conditions on the same date.

8.  On 14 January 2008, the applicant was honorably discharged from the ARNG and as a Reserve of the Army under the provisions of National Guard Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management), paragraph 8-26j(1), by reason of medical unfitness for retention.

9.  A 2 March 2011 PRARNG advisory memorandum advised the applicant that the PRARNG agreed he had been erroneously separated and recommended approval of his request; however, they had been advised not to make a final determination on his case.  Further, since he was no longer a member of the PRARNG they did not have the authority to reinstate him to afford him proper consideration of his medical conditions.

10.  In the processing of this case, on 23 August 2011, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Personnel Division, NGB.  The advisory official opined that the applicant had not been afforded his due process.  He recommended the applicant's record be sent to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) for disability processing and then referred to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) to determine suitability for a medical discharge.

11.  On 30 August 2011, a copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  He did not respond.

12.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) states the medical treatment facility commander will provide a thorough and prompt evaluation when a Soldier’s medical condition becomes questionable in respect to physical ability to perform his/her assigned duties; will appoint a PEB liaison officer to counsel Soldiers undergoing physical disability processing; and will ensure MEB proceedings referred to a PEB are complete, accurate, and fully documented.

13.  Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) provides that Soldiers with medical conditions who do not meet the required standards will be evaluated by an MEB and PEB, as appropriate.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should have been sent to an MEB and/or a PEB prior to being discharged from the ARNG.

2.  The applicant appears to have been afforded a VA disability evaluation of 20% for a scar and wound to his ear and 30% for PTSD at some point after he was released from active duty but before he was found unfit for retention by the ARNG.  There is no evidence he was processed through the PDES.

3.  It is reasonable to believe the applicant's PTSD is related to his combat experiences.  Therefore, it is recommended that the applicant's discharge from the PRARNG be voided and he be reinstated in the PRARNG; afforded an MEB/PEB; and be shown to be entitled to 15 membership points and 35 inactive duty for training points annually from the date of his voided ARNG discharge through completion of the MEB/PEB processing.  

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X ___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by recommending that:

	a.  the applicant's discharge from the PRARNG be voided and he be reinstated; 

	b.  he be afforded an MEB/PEB; and 



	c.  he be shown to be entitled to 15 membership points and 35 inactive duty for training points annually from the date of his voided ARNG discharge through completion of the MEB/PEB processing.  



      ___________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004434



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004434



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016007

    Original file (20100016007.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) complete a line-of-duty (LOD) investigation for the conditions used as the reason for his separation and reinstate him in order to be afforded due process. If approved, recommend that the Soldier's medical records be sent before Mandatory Medical Review Board (MMRB); an MEB for disability evaluation processing; and then be referred to the PEB to determine the Soldier's fitness for consideration for medical discharge. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007310

    Original file (20130007310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides a DA Form 2173, dated 24 August 2000, wherein it shows he was treated on 18 August 2000 at the Troop Medical Clinic (TMC), Camp Beauregard, LA, for an injury that was incurred on that date. He provides medical records, dated between 18 August 2000 and 25 February 2002, wherein they show he was treated as follows: a. Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023388

    Original file (20110023388.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of his request for review of discharge that he submitted to the PRARNG and his previous requests to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) which included documents from his medical treatment records and the VA. There is no evidence the applicant was referred to an MEB or PEB during the period of service under review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028773

    Original file (20100028773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. Neither his commander, nor any official within the PRARNG, ensured that a Line of Duty (LOD) investigation was conducted prior to his release from active duty (REFRAD). The board determined: * he was not able to comply with all of his MOS duties * he received a 20% Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability rating * he had completed 25 years of service and was qualified for retirement by Medical Conditions The board recommended he receive an L4 permanent profile with the assignment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014465

    Original file (20090014465.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) and transfer to the Retired Reserve be voided and that he be processed through the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES). While it cannot be determined based on the available evidence the extent of the applicant's disabilities at the time of his REFRAD and discharge, there is sufficient evidence to show he was being treated for depression while on active duty and prior to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003586

    Original file (20130003586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was injured while entitled to basic pay * his DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated February 2003, shows he was referred to an MEB; but, his MEB was never completed * there is no evidence showing he was properly counseled about his right to an MEB/PEB * he was issued an administrative honorable discharge instead of being referred through the PDES * it was the responsibility of his commander and the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) leadership to ensure he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026348

    Original file (20100026348.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * NGB Form 22 * NGB Form 22a (Correction to NGB Form 22) * Three DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Two DA Forms 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) * Two PRARNG memoranda * Department of the Army memorandum * Eight orders * Award certificate * Letter of recommendation * DA Form 2166-5A (Senior Enlisted Evaluation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019504

    Original file (20110019504.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence also showed his chain of command and the PRARNG failed to complete an LOD investigation and properly refer him for PDES processing; c. There was no evidence to show he was properly counseled as to his rights to referral to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) for the purpose of disability benefits determination as a result of a medical condition acquired...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028537

    Original file (20100028537.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The presumption is that the Army was correct in retiring the Soldier with 15 years of military service for a non-line of duty condition. Instead, he was separated under the non-duty related process for conditions that he clearly received while on active duty. c. Paragraph 8-9 states that a Soldier not on extended active duty, who is unfit because of physical disability: (1) May be permanently retired or have his or her name placed on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL), if he or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003755

    Original file (20130003755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary: Applicant requests that he be given an opportunity to have an MEB and a PEB review his Line of Duty (LOD)/medical documentation in order for him to receive a proper medical disposition upon his discharge from the PRARNG. c. Paragraph 3-2b (processing for separation or retirement from active duty) states disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to Soldiers whose service is interrupted and they can...