Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004377
Original file (20110004377.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  8 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110004377 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests designation as the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) beneficiary.

2.  The applicant states she does not believe the FSM intended to deprive her of the SBP benefit.

3.  The applicant provides copies of the FSM's 2005 death certificate, their marriage certificate, her daughter's birth certificate, and other documents, including:

* statements from their children and a granddaughter
* the FSM's DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty)
* their divorce decree
* a letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS)
* approximately 25 photographs of the FSM, family, and friends

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of 

Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The deceased FSM retired as a lieutenant colonel in January 1978.  He apparently elected spouse SBP coverage at that time.  He and the applicant divorced in June 1978.  The June 1978 divorce decree dissolving the marriage makes no mention of the SBP.

3.  The FSM died on 19 July 2005.  The death certificate shows he was married at the time of his death (not to the applicant).

4.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  An election, once made, was irrevocable except in certain circumstances.  Elections are made by category, not by name.

5.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.  Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 73, provides that a spouse loses status as an SBP beneficiary upon divorce; however, the means by which the divorced (former) spouse may receive a survivorship annuity are:

	a.  if the service member voluntarily elects to provide a former spouse annuity;

	b.  the election is made in order to comply with a court order; or

	c.  the election is made to comply with a voluntary written agreement related to a divorce action and that voluntary agreement is part of a court order for divorce, dissolution, or annulment.

6.  Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established SBP for former military spouses of retired members.

7.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(b)(3), incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  It permits a person who, incident to a proceeding of divorce, is required by court order to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse to make such an election.  If that person fails or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits the former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an election be deemed to have been made.  Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within 1 year of the date of the court order or filing involved.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The FSM designated his then wife as the beneficiary of his military SBP.  After his retirement, the parties divorced and the divorce decree was silent as to SBP.  The FSM did not voluntarily change his beneficiary to his former spouse after their divorce.  The FSM later remarried and his spouse at the time of his death is receiving those benefits as SBP beneficiary designations are by category, not by name.

2.  There is no evidence to show the FSM elected to provide SBP coverage for his former spouse.  At the time of their divorce, former spouse coverage was not authorized.  It appears his widow may be the legal beneficiary of his SBP election.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x__  __x______  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________x________________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004377



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004377



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022525

    Original file (20120022525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. There is no evidence that the FSM made any election. The FSM passed away on 26 October 2011 at the age of 52 and there is no evidence to show that the applicant or the FSM made a former spouse election under the SBP within 1 year of the divorce.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003194

    Original file (20140003194.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 October 2008, he made a spouse and children full coverage election with immediate coverage (option C) under the RCSBP. Public Law 99-661, enacted 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Accordingly, since the FSM elected spouse and child immediate full coverage and since he no longer had a spouse, his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021639

    Original file (20140021639.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of the divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017745

    Original file (20130017745.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from spouse to former spouse. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Even though the FSM continued...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006992

    Original file (20120006992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The evidence of record shows the FSM elected SBP spouse and dependent children coverage upon retirement. The evidence clearly shows the FSM's and applicant's divorce decree stipulated the applicant would remain the beneficiary of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014433

    Original file (20080014433.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM and the applicant were divorced on 28 November 2001. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The FSM and applicant were divorced on 28 November 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020624

    Original file (20110020624.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant and the FSM's divorce decree, dated 9 August 2002, stipulated the FSM would continue SBP coverage for the applicant. Therefore, she was ineligible to be the FSM's former spouse SBP beneficiary and also not entitled to receive an SBP annuity from his military retired pay account. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM changed his SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse"...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009743

    Original file (20120009743.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show he timely changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage at the time of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity as a result of his death. The FSM twice elected "spouse" coverage while married to the applicant and he was required to make a former spouse election as per their divorce decree. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140007672

    Original file (AR20140007672.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DFAS provided multiple documents among which was: * copy of the applicant's deemed election request for former spouse coverage, which was submitted within 1 year after the divorce * counsel's reinforcement of the applicant's deemed election request * applicant's and FSM's divorce decree * FSM's Death Certificate showing he died on 9 February 2014 * applicant's Death Certificate showing she died on 1 June 2014 * DFAS' denial of benefits letter to the FSM's widow * widow's Marriage...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001441

    Original file (20120001441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests reconsideration of her previous request for correction of the FSM's records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity election from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage within 1 year of his divorce. In their response, DFAS made the following points: * the FSM originally elected SBP coverage for his spouse * upon their Judgment of Divorce, dated 6 February 1997, the applicant lost her...