Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004328
Original file (20110004328.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110004328 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank), item 5b (Pay Grade), and item 6 (Date of Rank) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states:

* 91 days prior to his discharge he received an Article 15 and a suspended reduction from specialist four (SP4)/E-4 to private first class (PFC)/E-3
* he regained the rank/pay grade of SP4/E-4 the day before his discharge, but it was not entered on his DD Form 214

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* DA Form 2627-1 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  His entire military records covering the period 26 June 1968 to 25 June 1970 are not available for review.

3.  His induction record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 26 June 1968.  His DD Form 214 shows he served as a communications center specialist in Vietnam from 7 December 1968 to 6 December 1969.  On an unknown date, he attained the rank of SP4/E-4.

4.  On 24 March 1970, nonjudicial punishment was imposed against the applicant for failing to go to his appointed place of duty on 20 March 1970.  The DA Form 2627-1 shows his rank/pay grade as SP4/E-4.  His punishment consisted of a reduction from E-4 to E-3 (suspended for a period of 90 days).

5.  His DD Form 214 shows he was released from active duty on 25 June 1970 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.

6.  His DD Form 214 shows in:

* item 5a – "PFC"
* item 5b – "E3"
* item 6 (Date of Rank) – "23 Mar 70" [23 March 1970]

7.  There is no evidence that shows his suspended reduction to E-3 was vacated.

8.  His discharge orders, dated 22 June 1970, show his rank as SP4.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  His discharge orders, dated 22 June 1970, which show his rank as SP4 support his contention that held the rank of SP4 prior to his discharge.

2.  Since there is no evidence his suspended reduction to E-3 was vacated, it appears his reduction never occurred and his original date of rank (DOR) for SP4 should be reflected on his DD Form 214.  However, his original DOR for SP4 is not available.  As a result, the available evidence which shows he was serving in the rank of SP4 on 20 March 1970, the date of his misconduct, is accepted as sufficient evidence with which to amend items 5a, 5b, and 6 of his DD Form 214 to show his rank/pay grade as SP4/E-4 and DOR as 20 March 1970 at a minimum.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  deleting the entry from item 5a of his DD Form 214 and replacing it with the entry "SP4,"

	b.  deleting the entry from item 5b of his DD Form 214 and replacing it with the entry "E-4," and

	c.  deleting the entry from item 6 of his DD Form 214 and replacing it with the entry "20 Mar 70" [20 March 1970.]



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004328



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004328



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002226

    Original file (20130002226.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * Promotion orders * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The regulation, in effect at the time provided that for Item 5a, enlisted personnel would enter the grade in which serving at time of separation, indicating whether permanent or temporary.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002197

    Original file (20090002197.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the rank and pay grade shown on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant contends, in effect, that the rank and pay grade shown on his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 10 December 1970 should be corrected because there is no documentation in his records reducing him from PFC/E-3 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001834

    Original file (20110001834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The temporary appointment of a Regular Army enlisted Soldier automatically becomes permanent on the date of completion of the specific time in grade (TIG) and time in service (TIS) requirements, and are reflected as: a. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009240

    Original file (20130009240.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His record contains the following documents, dated 4 November 1971, which show his rank as SP5: * DA Form 664 (Serviceman's Statement Concerning Application for Compensation from the Veterans Administration) * DD Form 1407 (Dependent Medical Care and DD Form 1173 Statement) * DA Form 3032-R (Statement of Medical Condition) 8. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000752

    Original file (20120000752.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5. The applicant provides: * Unit Orders Number 21, issued by Company C, 508th Military Police Battalion, Fort Riley, KS, dated 18 March 1970 * his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant contends his military service records should be corrected to show he was promoted to SGT/E-5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009937

    Original file (20100009937.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100009937 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s record also contains the following documents prepared during his separation processing, all dated 29 May 1970, that list his rank and pay grade as SP5/E-5: * DD Form 1407 (Dependent Medical Care and DD Form 1173 Statement) * DA Form 1811 (Physical and Mental...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006100

    Original file (20140006100.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It is acknowledged the order, dated 22 February 1970, that released the applicant from active duty on that date indicates his rank was SP4. However, there is no evidence of record that shows he was promoted to SP4 (E-4).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011455

    Original file (20090011455.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows that he was promoted to PFC effective 10 January 1970. Item 24 does show he is authorized the Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars and he was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (shown as M-16). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002778

    Original file (20120002778.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his service in Korea and that he was separated in grade E-5. However, his DD Form 214 does not show his service in Korea or that he was separated in the grade of E-5. Records show the applicant served in Korea for 1 year and 1 month, from 7 April 1967 through 6 May 1968, and that this service is recorded in item 22, block c of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000347C070205

    Original file (20060000347C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence, and the applicant has provided none, to show that he was appointed as corporal to serve in a position vacancy which existed in his unit, prior to his release from active duty. There also is no evidence in the available records to show that he was advanced or promoted higher than pay grade E-4 prior to his release from active duty. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 15 April 1970; therefore, the...