Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003991
Original file (20110003991.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  8 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110003991 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of and correction to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending 31 December 1991 to show the following awards for his service in Southwest Asia during Desert Shield/Storm: 

* Valorous Unit Award
* Army Achievement Medal
* Kuwait Liberation Medal (Government of Kuwait)

2.  He states that the Valorous Unit Award was awarded for service from 15 to 25 February 1991 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 27, dated 27 December 1994.  He was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 3rd Armor, 1st Calvary Division.  He had already been discharged when the award was given and he believes he earned it, as well as everyone that was in his unit. 

3.  He also states that the Army Achievement Medal was never added to his DD Form 214.  As he recalls it was in his 201 File (Military Personnel Records Jacket).  He was awarded this medal for doing his job as a Soldier and believes it should be reflected in his record.  The Kuwait Liberation Medal was given after he was discharged.  He also believes his records should reflect this earned award.

4.  He provides a copy of his DD Form 214.


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available for review.  However, the DD Form 214 submitted by him is sufficient for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  His DD Form 214 shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 May 1985.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 11M, Fighting Vehicle Infantryman.  He served in Southwest Asia (Saudi Arabia) from 7 October 1990 through 17 April 1991, during three campaigns.  

4.  He served continuously on active duty through one reenlistment until he was honorably released from active duty in pay grade E-4 on 31 December 1991.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement).  He was credited with completing 6 years, 7 months, and 24 days of active service.

5.  Item 8a (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) of his DD Form 214 lists Company C, 1st Tank Battalion, 32nd Armor Regiment.

6.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 lists the:

* Army Commendation Medal
* Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award)
* National Defense Service Medal
* Army Service Ribbon
* Overseas Service Ribbon
* Combat Infantryman Badge
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar

* Army Lapel Button
* Southwest Asia Service Medal with two bronze service stars

7.  There is no available evidence or orders showing he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal.

8.  The Army Human Resources Command, Military Awards Branch, Previously Approved Unit Awards website, shows the 1st Battalion, 32nd Armor, 1st Calvary Division, was cited for award of the Valorous Unit Award for the period 15 to 25 February 1991, by DAGO Number 27, dated 27 December 1994.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Achievement Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States, who while serving in a noncombat area on or after 1 August 1981, distinguished themselves by meritorious service or achievement.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 also states that service in the Persian Gulf War is to be recognized by award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal to Army members who participated in Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm in the designated area on or after 2 August 1990.  A bronze service star is authorized for the Defense of Saudi Arabia (2 August 1990 through 16 January 1991), Liberation and Defense of Kuwait (17 January through 11 April 1991), and the Southwest Asia Cease-Fire (12 April 1991 through 30 November 1995) campaigns.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 further states the Kuwait Liberation Medal was awarded by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia was approved on 3 January 1992 and is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who participated in the Persian Gulf War between 17 January 1991 and 28 February 1991.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 further states the Kuwait Liberation Medal was awarded by the Government of Kuwait was approved on 9 November 1995 and is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who participated in the Persian Gulf War between 2 August 1990 and 31 August 1993.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant served in three campaigns during his deployment to Southwest Asia.  Therefore, he is entitled to an additional bronze service star, for a total of three, to be affixed to his Southwest Asia Service Medal.

2.  Based on his service in Southwest Asia he is also entitled to award of the Kuwait Liberation Medal awarded by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait Liberation Medal awarded by the Government of Kuwait and correction of his DD Form 214 to reflect these awards.

3.  The available evidence does not confirm he was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 32nd Armor, 1st Calvary Division, during the period it was cited for award of the Valorous Unit Award.  Therefore, he is not entitled to this award and its addition to his DD Form 214.

4.  There is also no available evidence of record and he has provided none to show he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal.  Therefore, he is also not entitled to this award and its addition to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* deleting from Item 13 of the applicant’s DD Form 214 the Southwest Asia Service Medal 
* adding to Item 13 of his DD Form 214 the following awards:

* Southwest Asia Service Medal with three bronze service stars
* Kuwait Liberation Medal awarded by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
* Kuwait Liberation Medal awarded by the Government of Kuwait

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Valorous Unit Award and Army Achievement Medal and their addition to his DD Form 214.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003991





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003991



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015757

    Original file (20130015757.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following awards be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 19 June 1991: * Kuwait Liberation Medal - Saudi Arabia * Kuwait Liberation Medal - Government of Kuwait 2. Based on his service with the 4th Battalion, 32nd Armor, he is authorized the Valorous Unit Award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005938

    Original file (20110005938.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 29 September 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110005938 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022060

    Original file (20110022060.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect his deployment with Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion, 32nd Armor Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division, Fort Hood, TX, and foreign service in Southwest Asia. The database shows he was deployed to Southwest Asia from 3 February through 18 April 1991 (a period of 2 months and 16 days) and 1 August through 31 August 1991 (a period of 31 days). The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003956

    Original file (20150003956.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Valorous Unit Award. General Orders awarded the applicant’s unit in Southwest Asia the Valorous Unit Award for a period during which he was assigned to the unit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from item 13 of his DD Form 214 the Southwest Asia Service Medal with 2 bronze...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010724

    Original file (20120010724.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in two separate applications, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the following awards: * Valorous Unit Award * Southwest Asia Service Medal * Kuwait Liberation Medal (Saudi Arabia) * Kuwait Liberation Medal (Kuwait) * Any other awards to which he may be entitled 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Southwest Asia Service Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who participated in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003498

    Original file (20120003498.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides a memorandum certifying his participation in ODS, an order for the Army Achievement Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster), a memorandum of eligibility for the Army Good Conduct Medal, and his DD Form 214 in support of his request. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006133

    Original file (20140006133.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant served in Southwest Asia from 31 December 1990 through 2 May 1991 during the Gulf War; therefore, he served a qualifying period for award of the KLM-SA and the KLM-K and he is entitled to correction of his records to show these awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Southwest Asia Service Medal with two bronze service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013842

    Original file (20100013842.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal and the Kuwait Liberation Medal for his service in the Persian Gulf after he was released from active duty and needs them added to his DD Form 214. With respect to the Army Achievement Medal, although there are no orders in his record for the Army Achievement Medal his DA Form 2-1 does show he was awarded an Army Achievement Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000777

    Original file (20130000777.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Valorous Unit Award. The Army Human Resources Unit Awards listing shows the 2d Battalion, 70th Armor, was awarded the Valorous Unit Award for the period 26 to 28 February 1991, by Department of the Army General Orders Number 12, dated 13 May 1994. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079218C070215

    Original file (2002079218C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal, and there is no evidence that he was recommended for award of the Army Commendation Medal. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal, and there is no evidence that he was recommended for award of the Army Achievement Medal. There is also no evidence of record available to the Board which...