IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 1 September 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110003829
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Good Conduct Medal.
2. The applicant states due to an oversight he was not awarded the Good Conduct Medal. He was promoted to pay grade E-5 and had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings. He is a member of the Vietnam Veterans of America, the American Legion, and he is an active volunteer in his community.
3. The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge), 1973 discharge orders, DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), and three membership cards.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant served on active duty in the Regular Army from 10 October 1967 through 2 October 1970 in military occupational specialty (MOS) 63C (General Vehicle Repairman) and in MOS 63H (Engine and Powertrain Repairman).
3. His DA Form 20 provides the following:
a. advancement to specialist five (SP5)/E-5 effective 22 January 1969;
b. service in Germany from 3 June 1968 through 29 September 1969;
c. award of the National Defense Service Medal and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar; and
d. conduct and efficacy ratings recorded exclusively as "excellent."
4. His DD Form 214 lists his awards as the National Defense Service Medal and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.
5. The applicant's record contains no record of negative counseling, nonjudicial punishment, or court-martial conviction.
6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), chapter 4, states the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of active Federal military service. A record of punishment is not automatically disqualifying. However, at that time, a single efficiency rating of less than "excellent" was disqualifying. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified. Current practice requires that the commander provide written notice of nonfavorable consideration and permits the individual to respond. At that time, a disqualification was normally noted on the DA Form 20.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's record contains no derogatory entries, disciplinary actions, nonjudicial punishment, or courts-martial that would suggest he was considered not eligible for award of the Good Conduct Medal.
2. The applicant distinguished himself by his conduct, efficiency and fidelity as evidenced by his conduct and efficiency ratings and his promotion to SP5. His record contains no evidence of any disqualifying incidents or denial of the award. 3. It is appropriate to award the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for his period of service from 10 October 1967 through 2 October 1970.
BOARD VOTE:
___X____ ___X____ ___X____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for his period of service from 10 October 1967 through 2 October 1970 and adding this award to his
DD Form 214.
___________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110003829
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110003829
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008943
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007143
His record contains a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 23 June 2005, that corrected his DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 February 1970 to add the: * Aircraft Crew Member Badge * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars 10. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012175
At that time, a disqualification was normally noted on the DA Form 20. b. the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (first award) for his period of service from 9 August 1966 through 8 August 1969 and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007816
The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) provides the following information: * service in Vietnam from 25 March 1970 through 25 February 1971 with 327th Transportation Detachment, 101st Airborne Division * conduct and efficiency ratings of exclusively "excellent" * participation in one campaign * award of the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000262
The applicants DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, but it does not show that he was awarded any bronze service stars to signify campaign participation credit. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, provided that the Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who distinguished themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016657
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The available evidence shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005589
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 31 (Foreign Service), he was credited with service in Vietnam from 12 December 1966 through 18 November 1967 * item 38 (Record of Assignments), he served in two units while in Vietnam * Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 3rd Squadron, 5th Cavalry Regiment, 9th Infantry Division, from 12 December 1966 to 16 April 1967 * Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 1st Squadron, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment, from 17 April to 17...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009497
It states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017555
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002139
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. It states the Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...