Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003644
Original file (20110003644.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	17 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110003644 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his promotion effective date and date of rank for chief warrant officer two (CW2) from 23 October 2009 to 2 May 2009.

2.  He states an administrative error at the unit due to the staff being in transition and understaffing issues prevented the prompt and complete submission of all required documents for the promotion packet.  He completed the warrant officer basic course (WOBC) on 10 September 2008.  The qualification for promotion to CW2 was met on 20 March 2009.  His valid Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) and height and weight evaluations and security clearance were on file.

3.  He provides:

* 2003 Person Summary for security clearance
* Army National Guard (ARNG) initial appointment orders, dated 19 April 2007
* DA Form 705 (AFPT Scorecard), dated April 2008
* DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 10 September 2008
* Medical Operational Data System – Individual Medical Readiness Record, dated 2 May 2009
* recommendation for promotion of warrant officer (WO) memorandum, dated 2 May 2009
* Personnel Qualification Record – Officers/WO's, dated 2 May 2009
* 
change of military occupational specialty (MOS) orders, dated 31 August 2009
* CW2 promotion orders, dated 22 January and 18 February 2010

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military records show he was appointed in the Missouri Army National Guard (MOARNG) as a warrant officer one (WO1) effective 20 March 2007.

2.  National Guard Bureau (NGB) published Special Orders Number 214 AR, dated 31 August 2009, extending him Federal recognition in MOS 001A effective 10 September 2008.

3.  He completed the Information Systems Technician WOBC on 10 September 2008.

4.  On 2 May 2009, he was recommended for promotion to CW2.  The memorandum verified he met all requirements for promotion to the higher grade.

5.  He completed a DA Form 71 (Oath of Office – Military Personnel) for appointment in the MOARNG as a CW2 on 2 May 2009.

6.  MOARNG published Orders 022-162, dated 22 January 2010, promoting him to CW2 with an effective date of 23 October 2009.  The orders stated, "Individual will not be paid at the higher grade until Federal recognition confirmed."

7.  NGB published Special Orders Number 28 AR, dated 18 February 2010, extending him Federal recognition in the grade of CW2 with an effective date of 23 October 2009 and issued promotion orders.

8.  He completed another oath of office for appointment in the MOARNG as a CW2 on 23 October 2009.

9.  In an advisory opinion received on 4 November 2011, the Chief, Personnel Division, NGB, reiterated the applicant's requests.  The NGB official stated:

	a.  The Soldier signed an oath of office on 20 March 2007 and completed the WOBC on 10 September 2008.  The Soldier became eligible for promotion to CW2 on 20 March 2009.

	b.  This is in accordance with National Guard Regulation 600-101 (WO's – Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions), section 7-8, that states, "a WO must complete the minimum years of promotion service as shown in 
table 7-1 to attain eligibility for promotion and receive Federal recognition in the higher grade."  Table 7-1 establishes 2 years as the minimum time in grade for promotion to CW2.  Table 7-2, states, "the Soldier has to complete the WOBC or equivalent within 2 years from the date of initial appointment as a WO1."

	c.  Eligibility for promotion does not mean automatic promotion to the next higher grade.  National Guard Regulation 600-101, paragraph 7-2, states, "promotion will be based on Department of the Army duty proponent MOS certification via satisfactory completion or constructive credit of appropriate level of military education, time in grade, demonstrated technical and tactical competence, and potential for service in the next higher grade as determined by a Federal recognition board (FRB).  Promotion will not be used solely as a reward for past performance."

	d.  An NGB memorandum, dated 18 February 2010, stated, "your promotion and authorization for pay and allowances in the higher grade are effective on the date shown after A above."  The date reflected on the memorandum is 23 October 2009.  WO policy indicates the recommendation for promotion by the State does not justify the promotion prior to the date of the FRB.

10.  The NGB official recommended denial of the applicant's request and the State concurred.

11.  The opinion was forwarded to the applicant for acknowledgement/rebuttal on 4 November 20011.  He did not respond.

12.  National Guard Regulation 600-101 prescribes the policies and procedures for ARNG WO personnel management.  Paragraph 7-1 of this regulation specifies that appointment and promotion of WO's in the ARNG is a function of the State Adjutant General.  These appointments and promotions must be Federally recognized.  WO's may be examined for promotion not earlier than 3 months in advance of completing the prescribed promotion requirements so that, if recommended by a FRB, promotion may be effected on the date the promotion requirements are met.  FRB's convening to examine promotion of WO's who have passed their promotion eligibility date, may, if so recommended and determined fully qualified on their promotion eligibility date, consider granting temporary Federal recognition retroactive to that date, but not earlier than 90 days from the date of the FRB.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed as a WO1 effective 20 March 2007 and completed WOBC on 10 September 2008.  Based on the requirement for completion of 2 years of time in grade for promotion to CW2, he was eligible for promotion on 20 March 2009.

2.  He was recommended for promotion to CW2 on 9 May 2009.  On 22 January 2010, MOARNG published orders promoting him to CW2 with an effective date of 23 October 2009.  The orders stated he would not be paid at the higher grade until Federal recognition was confirmed.  He was extended Federal recognition and promoted to CW2 with an effective date of 23 October 2009.

3.  It appears his promotion to CW2 was approved by an FRB held in January 2010 with an effective date no earlier than 90 days from the date of the FRB in accordance with regulatory guidance.  This is the earliest possible promotion date for which he was eligible.  Promotion is not automatic upon meeting the time in grade, education, and all other requirements.  He was not eligible for promotion until after the FRB made its recommendation for his promotion.  WO policy indicates that recommendation for promotion by the State does not justify the promotion prior to the date of the FRB.

4.  His contention was noted and was found to lack merit.  The evidence of record does not show his promotion to CW2 was delayed or that an administrative error occurred denying him a timely promotion to CW2.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X_  __X______  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_______________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003644



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003644



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011992

    Original file (20110011992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) to chief warrant officer two (CW2). Section 14308 (f) states the effective date of a promotion of a Reserve officer of the Army who is extended Federal recognition in the next higher grade in the ARNG shall be the date on which such Federal recognition in that grade is so extended. The evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed as a WO in the ARNG on 20 September 2008 and he completed the IER Wing Aviator on 25 August 2010.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019774

    Original file (20120019774.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Due to unit transfers, paperwork mishandling, and processing times, his promotion did not occur until 23 July 2012 with a DOR of 13 July 2012. b. His packet was approved by the State promotion board on 16 March 2012 and he was granted Federal recognition for CW2 on 23 July 2012 with a DOR of 13 July 2012. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was appointed as a WO1 in the MOARNG on 7 December 2007 and that he met the minimum time-in-grade and education requirements and was fully...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002793

    Original file (20120002793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An NGB official recommended approval and stated that the applicant met the educational and time in grade requirements; however, due to delays that snowballed into more delays, he was ultimately denied promotion for almost a year. If this had been done, the delays related to missing the state FRB in September, an outdated PHA, and the delays associated with the new Federal Recognition process for warrant officers could have been avoided. In an email, dated 2 October 2010, a state official...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019347

    Original file (20130019347.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) to chief warrant officer two (CW2) in the New York Army National Guard (NYARNG) from 29 January 2013 to 20 August 2012. He further contends his DOR should be adjusted in accordance with (lAW) the NGB PPOM Number 13-006, dated 6 February 2013, which states in part, "Implement the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for WO promotions to CW2 which removed the requirement for a Federal Recognition Board (FRB) for promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021053

    Original file (20120021053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) to chief warrant officer two (CW2) from 17 October 2012 to 29 June 2012. The applicant states his CW2 promotion packet was boarded by the State Federal Recognition Board (FRB) on 31 March 2012. The evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed as a WO in the ARNG on 29 June 2010 and he completed WOBC on 5 November 2010.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025187

    Original file (20110025187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 January 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110025187 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states: * prior to enactment of the 2011 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), Army National Guard (ARNG) officers were promoted by the Chief, National Guard Bureau (NGB) and the Secretary of the Army, under the provisions of Title 32, U.S. Code * after the 2011 NDAA, the authority was elevated from the Secretary of the service to the President of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001642

    Original file (20120001642.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 January 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120001642 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests adjustment of his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to chief warrant officer two (CW2), from 2 December 2011 to 6 June 2011. The evidence of record shows the applicant's date of rank as a WO1 was 5 June 2009 and he completed WOBC on 20 August 2010.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020954

    Original file (20120020954.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect: * adjustment of initial effective date of appointment and date of rank (DOR) to warrant officer one (WO) from 19 June 2012 to 31 July 2010 * promotion to chief warrant officer two (CW2) * restoration of back pay and allowances 2. Furthermore, had the applicant's Federal recognition date been correct, he would have been promoted to CW2 effective 31 July 2012, the date he met the 2-years time in grade requirements. Contrary to the NGB's advisory opinion,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000436

    Original file (20130000436.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he completed the Warrant Officer Basic Course (WOBC) on 5 November 2010 but his Federal recognition order shows an effective date of 23 January 2012 * he met the eligibility requirements for promotion to CW2 in the CAARNG upon completion of WOBC * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Policy Memorandum Number 07-026, dated 14 August 2007, subject: Policy to Appoint Sergeant First Class (SFC) to CW2, authorizes such promotion 3. He was promoted to SFC/E-7 on 30 May 2008. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018149

    Original file (20140018149.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests her date of rank (DOR) for promotion to chief warrant officer two (CW2) in the Georgia Army National Guard (GAARNG) be amended to the date she completed the Warrant Officer (WO) Basic Course (WOBC). National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-101 (WO Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions), paragraph 2-10c (in effect at the time) essentially states a Soldier in the rank of MSG may be promoted to CW2 in one of two ways, after first having served in the rank for 2...