Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003054
Original file (20110003054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  27 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110003054 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge to uncharacterized.

2.  The applicant states he was young, in a bad marriage, and made bad decisions.  He is a different person now.  He has a chance at a very good job with the Sherriff's Office, but the discharge is holding him back.  He worked for the same company for 26 years, but was laid off due to cutbacks.  Now, he has a chance to work again.

3.  The applicant provides a letter and a disqualification form from the Saint John's County Sherriff's Office stating he is disqualified as an employment applicant because he does not have an honorable, uncharacterized, or general under honorable conditions discharge.  He also submits a copy of his Undesirable Discharge Certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was married on 27 January 1975.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 October 1975.  He apparently completed basic training, but was absent without leave from advanced individual training and never completed training.

3.  He was separated under other than honorable conditions on 29 April 1976 due to conduct triable by court-martial.  He completed 4 months and 24 days of creditable service and accrued 38 days of lost time due to AWOL.

4.  No separation processing documents are contained in the available records.  His DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) indicates the authority for separation as Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 10.

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of the version in effect at the time provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service at any time after court-martial charges were preferred.  Commanders would ensure that an individual was not coerced into submitting a request for discharge for the good of the service.  Consulting counsel would advise the member concerning the elements of the offense or offenses charged, the type of discharge normally given under the provisions of this chapter, the loss of Veterans Administration benefits, and the possibility of prejudice in civilian life because of the characterization of such a discharge.  An undesirable discharge certificate would normally be furnished to an individual who was discharged for the good of service.

6.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.  Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier's separation specifically allows such characterization.

7.  The uncharacterized discharge did not come into existence until October 1982.

8.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records), paragraph 2-9, states the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The details surrounding the applicant's discharge are not available and he has provided none.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant's discharge processing was accomplished correctly and that the characterization of his service is equitable.  There is no error, injustice or inequity.

2.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x__  ____x____  __x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x______________
                   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003054



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003054



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021866

    Original file (20100021866.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to a general discharge. On 10 February 1976, the applicant consulted with counsel and voluntarily requested a discharge under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), for the good of the service: a. He also stated he wanted out of the Army because his records were mixed-up with several AWOLs and court-martials that were not true, but he had been unable to get anyone to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024882

    Original file (20110024882.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable or a general discharge. Following consultation with legal counsel, the applicant requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. On 21 January 1975, the separation authority approved his request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006931

    Original file (20100006931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of the version in effect at the time provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge, could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service at any time after court-martial charges were preferred,. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show, or it must otherwise...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016479

    Original file (20110016479.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant did not provide any evidence. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008698

    Original file (20130008698.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 February 1975, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, an undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate at the time of the applicant’s discharge. ____________x______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028011

    Original file (20100028011.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 May 1976 after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. On 25 May 1976, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed the issuance of an undesirable discharge. ____________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013869

    Original file (20090013869.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090013869 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge under honorable conditions. On 29 May 1975, the applicant was accordingly discharged.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010785

    Original file (20120010785.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chapter 10 of the version in effect at the time provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge, could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service at any time after court-martial charges were preferred. Consulting counsel would advise the member concerning the elements of the offense or offenses charged, type of discharge normally given under the provisions of this chapter, the loss of Veterans...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000585

    Original file (20120000585.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Following consultation with legal counsel, he requested discharge under the provisions chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood by requesting discharge he was admitting guilt to the charges against him or of a lesser included offense that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or a dishonorable discharge. On 26 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003180C070208

    Original file (20040003180C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The applicant's records show that he received one Article 15 and was AWOL over 30 days. Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.