BOARD DATE:	  30 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110003052 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge.

2.  The applicant states that at the time of his discharge his mother was on her death bed and he elected to go home. 

3.  The applicant did not provide any evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 29 September 1978.  He completed basic combat training at Fort Dix, NJ, and he proceeded to Fort Jackson, SC for completion of advanced individual training.

3.  On 9 January 1979, he departed his training unit in an absent without leave status and on 9 February 1979, he was dropped from the Army rolls as a deserter.  He surrendered to military authorities at Fort Jackson on 26 April 1979. 

4.  The complete facts and circumstances of the applicant’s discharge are not available for review with this case.  However, his records contain the following documents:

	a.  a copy of Order 124-080, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center, Fort Jackson, SC on 19 June 1979 ordering his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, effective 21 June 1979; and 

	b.  A duly-constituted DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) that shows he was discharged on 21 June 1979 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of a court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions character of service.  This form also shows he completed 5 months and 7 days of creditable active service and he had 106 days of lost time.

5.  There is no indication he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitation.

6.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt.  Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his under other than honorable conditions discharge should be upgraded to a general discharge.

2.  The applicant’s record is void of the facts and circumstances that led to his discharge.  However, his record contains a duly-constituted DD Form 214 that shows he was discharged on 21 June 1979 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of a court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions character of service. 

3.  The issuance of a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation
635-200, chapter 10, required the applicant to have voluntarily, willingly, and in writing, request discharge from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial.  It is presumed that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  The applicant has provided no evidence that would indicate the contrary.  Further, it is presumed that the applicant’s discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service during his last enlistment.   

4.  The applicant's circumstances regarding his ill mother at the time are noted.    However, they are not sufficiently mitigating in granting him the requested relief.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x__  ___x_____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _ x  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003052



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003052



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1