Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002391
Original file (20110002391.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  8 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110002391 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states:

* he was ordered to spend 1 year on active duty in the Republic of Vietnam with the "USRV Highway Traffic Control"
* he states that he was in country from July 1968 to June 1969
* he is aware of the requirements to earn the Good Conduct Medal, but he was in Vietnam for 1 year, less a few days
* he was a good Soldier while he was in the military and he has been a good citizen serving his community as a high school teacher

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 27 June 1969, and the criteria for award of the Good Conduct Medal from Wikipedia.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 August 1966, in the pay grade of E-1.  He completed training as a combat engineer.

3.  He was honorably discharged on 4 July 1967 to accept an appointment as a commissioned officer in the U.S. Army.  The DD Form 214 he received shows he completed 10 months and 6 days of active duty enlisted service.  His DD Form 214 also shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge (Rifle M-14).

4.  On 5 July 1967, the applicant accepted an appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank of second lieutenant/O-1.  He was immediately ordered to active duty. 

5.  The applicant arrived in Vietnam on 3 July 1968.  He departed Vietnam 
en-route to the United States on 23 June 1969.

6.  He was released from active duty on 27 June 1969.  He was assigned to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  The DD Form 214 he received shows the following awards:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Bronze Star Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Two Overseas Service Bars

7.  The applicant submits a document from Wikipedia describing the Good Conduct Medal and explaining the criteria for issuance of the award.

8.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been noted.  His supporting evidence has been considered.

2.  In accordance with the applicable regulation, the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) may be awarded upon termination of enlisted active service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. 

3.  He had one period of enlisted service which was from 29 August 1966 to 4 July 1967 (10 months and 6 days).  He also served in Vietnam was as a Reserve commissioned officer.

4.  He did not serve a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award).  In view of the foregoing, his request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110002391



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110002391



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010495

    Original file (20130010495.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he served his country honorably from 6 February 1967 to 12 December 1968 including 13 months and 27 days in combat * he should be entitled to the Army Good Conduct Medal based on Executive Order Number 10444, dated 10 April 1953 * he was never awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge despite holding an infantry specialty and participating in many battles and campaigns 3. A review of his service record does not reveal special orders that show he was awarded the Combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028624

    Original file (20100028624.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, National Defense Service Medal, and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. It appears he met the regulatory requirements for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on a qualifying period of service from 19 November 1964 through 17 November 1967. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015549

    Original file (20100015549.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from 2 May 1967 to 27 April 1968. The evidence of record shows the applicant served with the 137th and the 517th Engineer Companies in Vietnam; however, there is no evidence the applicant was assigned or attached to the 19th Engineer Battalion in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005658

    Original file (20140005658.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), for the period ending on 24 April 1967, to add and/or award any awards to which he is entitled. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in Korea from 26 November 1962 to 1 January 1964. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting his DD Form 214 for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022558

    Original file (20110022558.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he never received the Army Good Conduct Medal; however, he received the Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award), but it was never added to his DD Form 214. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 24 July 1967 through 23 July 1970; b. deleting from his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005459

    Original file (20080005459.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Purple Heart, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the National Defense Service Medal. It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005381

    Original file (20130005381.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Records also show the applicant participated in four campaigns...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012448

    Original file (20120012448.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award). Based on the available evidence it would be appropriate at this time to correct his 9 July 1969 DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting award of the Vietnam Service Medal from item 24 of his 9 May 1969 DD Form 214, b. adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023628

    Original file (20100023628.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 31 March 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100023628 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or is authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Army Commendation Medal 8. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019053

    Original file (20090019053.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Therefore, it appears the applicant met the eligibility criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (first award) for the period 29 March 1967 through 15 April 1969, ending with a period of active service of less than 3 years but more...