Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002106
Original file (20110002106.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  13 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110002106 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge.

2.  The applicant states he was told that because he was a sergeant, drug rehabilitation and continuation of service was not an option.  So as soon as he was discharged he enrolled in and completed a rehabilitation program and has remained drug free since that time.  In his civilian capacity since discharge, he has worked as an investigator for a city department of consumer services, driven a tractor trailer, completed a certificate course at a college, has done construction work, and is currently a general contractor/sole proprietor of a business.  

3.  He adds that he has "earnest expectations for a favorable finding in my application for an upgrade in my discharge" and that "To err is human, to forgive divine." 

4.  The applicant provides a clinical discharge summary with a discharge date of 3 November 1993; two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); and his birth certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 January 1980, was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) of medical specialist, was promoted to pay grade E-4, and was honorably released from active duty at the expiration of his term of service on 17 December 1982.  During this period of service he accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) twice for possession of marijuana and missing movement.

3.  He enlisted with prior service on 7 March 1989 and was awarded the MOS of light wheel vehicle mechanic.  He was promoted to the rank of sergeant, pay grade E-5.

4.  On 27 April 1993, he accepted NJP for wrongfully using cocaine.

5.  On 2 June 1993, his commander notified him of his intent to recommend his separation due to misconduct due to his positive urinalysis for cocaine and of his rights in conjunction with that recommendation.  The applicant submitted a conditional waiver wherein he waived his rights contingent upon his receiving no less than a general discharge.

6.  The applicant's commander then forwarded his recommendation to separate the applicant which was approved by the appropriate authority.

7.  Accordingly, on 1 July 1993, the applicant was given a general discharge for misconduct, abuse of illegal drugs.

8.  The clinical discharge summary provided by the applicant shows he was admitted for drug detoxification and rehabilitation on 12 October 1993.  In that summary it was stated the applicant reported using cocaine from 1984 to 1988 and then again from 1992 to 1993.  He said that he was consuming up to $300.00 worth of cocaine a day prior to his admission.

9.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of the regulation deals with separation for various types of misconduct, which includes drug abuse, and provides that individuals identified as drug abusers may be separated prior to their normal expiration of term of service. Individuals in pay grades E-5 and above must be processed for separation upon discovery of a drug offense.  Those in pay grades below E-5 may also be processed after a first drug offense and must be processed for separation after a second offense.  The issuance of a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was a sergeant who tested positive for cocaine.  As such, he was properly processed for discharge for misconduct, abuse of illegal drugs.  The normal characterization of service for such a separation is under other than honorable conditions.

2.  The applicant was afforded leniency when the approving authority accepted his conditional waiver and gave him a general discharge.

3.  While the applicant's post-service achievements and his drug-free life are commendable, those achievements do not warrant upgrading a discharge for misconduct to fully honorable.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x______  ___x_____  ___x__  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110002106





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110002106



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008135

    Original file (20100008135.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The circumstances under which he was discharged merited the character of the discharge at the time. He was advised of the factual reasons for the proposed separation action and that he could be discharged with a UOTHC discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012754

    Original file (20090012754.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 February 2006, the applicant’s immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with paragraph 14-12(c) of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) for misconduct, commission of a serious offense, and for wrongful use of cocaine on four separate dates. The ADRB did not change the reason for discharge for the discharge was for misconduct, abuse of illegal drugs, and fully supported by the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018575

    Original file (20080018575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army policy states that a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. The applicant contends that his general, under honorable conditions discharge should be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Records also show that he was discharged for the abuse of illegal drugs, which is a serious offense, and the applicant failed to provide evidence which shows that any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008637

    Original file (20120008637.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge. The applicant states all of his service up to the time of his infraction was completely honorable. There is no evidence he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board within its 15-year statute of limitations for an upgrade of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025114

    Original file (20110025114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests upgrade of his general discharge to honorable. On 17 June 1991, the applicant received a moral waiver for three instances of passing bad checks and enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-3 for 4 years and training in MOS 91A (medical specialist). On 28 June 1993, the applicant was discharged accordingly under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, for misconduct by abuse of illegal drugs.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008909

    Original file (20100008909.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 16 February 1993, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation action and directed that the applicant be given an under other than honorable discharge. The applicant contends that his under other than honorable conditions discharge should be upgraded to a general discharge because his discharge was based on two Article 15s for testing positive for marijuana, he was never given a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019073

    Original file (20100019073 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his general discharge from the Army National Guard (ARNG) be upgraded to an honorable discharge. After he retired he tested positive for marijuana and was recommended for a general discharge by a administrative discharge review board which convened after he received his 20 year letter and retired. Accordingly, on 15 October 1995, the applicant was given a general discharge and issued an NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010870

    Original file (20140010870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his general discharge (GD) to a fully honorable discharge (HD). The commander cited AWOL from on or about 20 February to on or about 26 June 2009 and testing positive for marijuana and cocaine as the basis for his recommendation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007182

    Original file (20090007182.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 7-11(C)(1), in effect at the time, provided for the discharge for misconduct when it was determined that the Soldier was unqualified for further military service by reason of abuse of illegal drugs. However, her overall record of service was considered at the time of her general discharge and the character of her service appears to be appropriate considering all of the facts of the case. There is no evidence of record,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025287

    Original file (20100025287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 April 1988, the applicant's immediate commander, CPT MJS, notified the applicant of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct - commission of a serious offense - abuse of illegal drugs. On 20 June 1988, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, by reason of misconduct -...