Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001852
Original file (20110001852.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    9 August 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110001852 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart (PH).

2.  He states, in effect, his injury is recorded in his medical records but the PH was not entered on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). 

3.  He provides:

* a letter to him from the National Personnel Records Center
* his DD Form 214
* several pages from his service medical records

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 September 1967.  After completing initial entry training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) and assigned for duty in Vietnam with Company A, 1st Battalion, 7th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), where he served from 19 March 1968 to 8 March 1969.  He was honorably released from active duty on 18 September 1970 after completing 2 years, 11 months, and 22 days of total active service.

3.  A Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) shows he received a puncture wound to his right foot on 16 February 1969.  The form shows he was given penicillin and a tetanus vaccination and returned to duty.  The form does not show the cause of the injury.

4.  The record is void of documentation showing he was awarded the PH.  

5.  His name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Awards and Decorations Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal orders awarding the PH to him.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record indicates the applicant received a puncture wound to his right foot during his service in Vietnam.  However, the available documentation does not show he incurred this injury while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  In the absence of such evidence, there is an insufficient basis for awarding him the Purple Heart or correcting his record to show this award.






BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001852





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001852



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003103

    Original file (20110003103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He requests, through his Congressional representative, reconsideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision denying him the award of the Purple Heart. The service medical treatment record, provided by the applicant, indicates that on 5 July 1969 he was treated for a puncture wound on the bottom of his right foot and had sand debris in the wound.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021340

    Original file (20140021340.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214, three third-party statements, eight DA Forms 1594 (Daily Staff Journal or Duty Officer's Log) pertaining to the 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry covering the period 27-29 November 1968, and orders for the Air Medal. The applicant's military records are not available for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to his DD Form 214 the Air Medal, Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010681

    Original file (20060010681.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was wounded twice in Vietnam. Therefore, there is no basis for awarding the applicant a second or third award of the AGCM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was awarded the AGCM for the period 29 February 1964 to 28 February 1967, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022001

    Original file (20110022001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following: * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) * 2 letters of support * DA Form 759 (Individual Flight Record and Flight Certificate) * 4 pages of medical records * 2 pages of Clinical Records Cover Worksheet * DA Form 3647 (Clinical Record Cover Sheet) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He further states on 25 January 1971, the NIGHTHAWK was launched to assist a sniper team in the vicinity of one of their firebases and during the attempt it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017321C071029

    Original file (20060017321C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. It states, in pertinent part, that in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of this treatment must...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005231

    Original file (20090005231.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-10 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the NDSM and states, in pertinent part, that it is authorized for honorable active service for any period between 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974. Therefore, it would be appropriate to accept the date provided by the applicant as the most accurate date, and to award him the PH for wounds received as a result of hostile action in the RVN in June 1967; and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015465

    Original file (20090015465.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Presidential Unit Citation, Army Good Conduct Medal, Purple Heart, and the Air Service Medal. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) on his DA Form 20 does not list the Presidential Unit Citation, Army Good Conduct Medal, Purple Heart, or the Air Service Medal as authorized awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060362C070421

    Original file (2001060362C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 states "None" in Block 34 (Wounds Received in Action). DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004930

    Original file (20110004930.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Forms 20 does not reflect a combat wound or injury and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this form does not show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded or injured as a result of combat. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention and sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089097C070403

    Original file (2003089097C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he received the PH on 30 September 1967. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 September 1965 for a period of 3 years. Based on the evidence in this case, the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show awards which were omitted through administrative error at the time the applicant was separated from active duty.