Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001809
Original file (20110001809.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  28 July 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110001809 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his Army Achievement Medal (AAM).

2.  He states the award was not added to his DD Form 214 prior to his discharge from the Army in 1985.

3.  He provides a copy of a DA Form 4980-18 (AAM Certificate).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 April 1979.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 19E (Armor Crewman).

3.  Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II) does not show award of the AAM.

4.  The applicant provided a copy of his AAM certificate for the period 23 June 1981 to 22 February 1984.  The certificate does not contain an orders number.

5.  His record is void of official orders to validate the award of the AAM.

6.  On 21 November 1985, the applicant was discharged.  He completed 6 years, 6 months, and 12 days of net active service with 16 days of time lost.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AAM is awarded to any member of the armed forces of the United States, who while serving in a noncombat area on or after 1 August 1981, distinguished themselves by meritorious service or achievement.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to add the AAM to his DD Form 214 was carefully considered; however, it is not supported by the evidence of record. 

2.  His record is void of evidence and he has not provided sufficient evidence, such as official orders, which show he was awarded the AAM.  Army regulations provide that the AAM will be announced in orders; therefore, the AAM certificate alone is an insufficient basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001809



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001809



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000147

    Original file (20150000147.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Though the applicant's records do not contain and he does not provide a copy of orders awarding him the AAM, he provides a copy of an AAM Certificate, dated 24 September 1985, and his records contain a DA Form 2446, dated 24 September 1985,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005348

    Original file (20140005348.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * Air Assault Badge * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (2nd Award) * he was honorably discharged * he was promoted to specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 * he served in the Delaware National Guard 2. As such, there is no basis for correcting the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his DEARNG service or his honorable discharge from the USAR. Absent orders which awarded him this medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003730

    Original file (20110003730.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (4th Award) and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). He states orders for the AAM (4th Award) and ARCOM were never placed in his DA Form 201 (Military Personnel Records Jacket). Army regulations provide that the AAM and ARCOM will be announced in orders; therefore, the AAM and ARCOM certificates alone are insufficient evidence for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005881

    Original file (20140005881.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 June 1986, his bar to reenlistment was approved. Therefore, he is not entitled to the requested relief; c. NDSM, he did not serve during an authorized period for this award. Therefore, he is not entitled to the requested relief; and d. AFRM, he did not complete 10 qualifying years of Reserve Component service or serve on active duty in support of specific U.S. military operations or contingencies on or after 1 August 1990 for this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012177

    Original file (20110012177.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His request to add the AAM to his DD Form 214 was carefully considered; however, it is not supported by the evidence of record. His record is void of evidence and he has not provided sufficient evidence, such as official orders, which show he was awarded the AAM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025203

    Original file (20110025203.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) does not show award of the AAM and there is no evidence in the available record and the applicant did not provide any evidence showing he was awarded the AAM. The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of a second JSCM and award of the AAM was carefully considered and it was determined there is sufficient evidence to grant partial relief. There is no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003706

    Original file (20120003706.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * two Army Achievement Medals (AAM's) * two Army Good Conduct Medals (AGCM's) * two Overseas Service Ribbons (OSR's) * all Gulf War awards and decorations * two military occupational specialties (MOS's) 2. The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence and his record is void of documentation which shows he was recommended for or awarded any AGCMs during his period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005413

    Original file (20090005413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). However, his request to have the AAM added to his DD Form 214 was overlooked and not discussed in the Record of Proceedings. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090005413 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090005413 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015164

    Original file (20130015164.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (2nd Award) * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (3rd Award) 2. Permanent Orders 158-07, dated 6 June 2012, contained in his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) show he was awarded the ARCOM for the period 18 April 2012 to 3 May 2012. His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the ARCOM and the AAM (2nd Award).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026648

    Original file (20100026648.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he received three awards of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and to show his service in Korea with Company B, 2d Supply and Transport Battalion, 2d Infantry Division. The applicant's record contains two orders awarding him the AAM and his DD Form 214 shows he was twice awarded the AAM. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.