Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001428
Original file (20110001428.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  29 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110001428 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the National Guard Bureau's (NGB) decision to deny him payment of an extension bonus be overturned.

2.  He states that he enlisted in the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) on 8 August 2008 for 6 years for a $20,000 affiliation bonus.  He has been informed that a Bonus Control Number was never assigned as a result of an error by his recruiter.  

3.  He provides 

* his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) ending on 13 September 2005
* A 2008 DD Form 4/1 (Enlisted/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States)
* Annex B to DD Form 4, Enlisted Affiliation Bonus (AB) Addendum, ARNG of the U.S.
* an exception to policy memorandum

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s military record shows he enlisted in the U. S. Marine Corps (USMC) on 14 September 2000 and he was honorably released from active duty on 13 September 2005. 

2.  He executed a 6 year enlistment in the CAARNG on 8 August 2008.  
	a.  Annex B, section III (1) (Payments) states, “Incentive payment will be as follows:  6-year AB for Affiliation in a Critical UIC (Unit Identification Code) for a 6-year enlistment in a critical UIC and I will received an AB in the amount of $20,000.  I certify that I am enlisting in an NGB approved critical UIC as per Section II, number 5 above, and I am MOS (military occupational specialty) qualified for the valid position vacancy up to 125 percent of a unit’s war time strength for which I am enlisting.  My bonus will be paid in one lump sum payment, which will be processed upon enlistment in the ARNG.”

	b.  Annex B, section VII”I (Authentication) reflects the applicant acknowledged enlistment to an AB.  This section also shows a control number was pending.

	c.  Annex B, section IX (Certification by Service Representative) shows a civilian certified and witnessed the agreement. 

3.  On 26 August 2010, a memorandum to the G-1 Personnel of All States, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, and the District of Columbia, stated that all Exception to Policy for the Selective Reserve Incentive Program contracts without a valid Information Management and Reporting Center IMARC (Information Management and Reporting) Bonus Control Number will not be accepted after 30 September 2010.  Requests received after that suspense date would be returned without action to the Incentive Manager for submission to the Army Board for Correction of Military Record for adjudication.

4.  National Guard Regulation 600-7 (Selective Reserve Incentive Programs), chapter 2, paragraph 2-5, provides that enlistment bonus contracts are valid only with bonus control numbers which will be issued from the State Incentive Management Office to Military Entrance Processing Station counselors and reported to NGB on a monthly basis.  The State Incentive Manager will verify accession packets as prescribed by state policy for bonus control numbers, accuracy of enlistment contract and bonus addendum, critical skill and bonus unit eligibility, valid position vacancy, and required educational level.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence confirms the applicant enlisted in the CAARNG for 6 years.  His career counselor annotated the annexes to his enlistment showing control number pending.  However, the Bonus Control Number BCN was never issued to him.

2.  It is evident that errors were committed in the processing of his enlistment extension.  However, regardless of whether his Bonus Control Number was not issued in error, this was not the fault of the applicant.  Therefore, he should not be penalized for errors committed by the CAARNG recruiting officials, the State Incentive Manager, or the NGB.

3.  The applicant met all of the requirements he agreed to in his extension addendum; therefore, he should be entitled to payment of the agreed upon bonus.

BOARD VOTE:

__X_____  ___X____  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* showing he enlisted the CAARNG for 6 years and qualified for a $20,000 affiliation bonus and received a valid Bonus Control Number upon enlisting in the CAARNG
* showing he is entitled to payment of the bonus in accordance with the terms of his enlistment addendum
* paying him, out of Army National Guard funds, the bonus as specified in his enlistment addendum



      ________X________________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001428





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001428



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009394

    Original file (20130009394.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His request to change his enlistment MOS to 11B is based on the fact that he served as an active duty Marine Rifleman for more than 2 years, had less than 20 years of total active military service, enlisted in the ARNG for 6 years, was MOS qualified as an 11B at the time of his enlistment, and affiliated to a critical unit possessing a critical skill. The applicant provides: * a self-authored statement * 8 memoranda * 13 pages of electronic mail (Email) * a diploma * 3-page Incentives Task...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020728

    Original file (20140020728.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he enlisted in the ORARNG on 7 March 2009 for military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B (Medical Specialist) * at the time of his enlistment, MOS 91B was a critical MOS and offered a $20,000 lump sum bonus * he was processed by his recruiter and completed training; when he returned to his unit, he was told he would receive only $10,000 * his DD Form 1966/1 (Record of Military Processing) states "a critical Unit Identification Code (UIC) valid vacancy, $20,000 bonus" *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012477

    Original file (20130012477.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) in the "Active First" program for a period of 4 years with a $40,000 bonus. The G-1 advisory official's review of the case revealed the applicant was requesting the $20,000 enlistment bonus he was entitled to for enlisting in the ARNG in addition to the $40,000 enlistment bonus that he received for enlisting into the Active Army under the "Active First" program. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015501

    Original file (20130015501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SIAC audited the applicant's records and discovered that he was not eligible to contract for or receive payment on the EAB and SLRP incentives he enlisted for on 7 November 2007. c. At the time of his enlistment, he also contracted for a $20,000.00 SLRP incentive. He was not eligible to receive SLRP benefits at the time he contracted because he was not MOS qualified.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020254

    Original file (20130020254.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a statement of support, dated 28 March 2013, wherein a judge advocate with Legal Assistance, CAARNG, recommended approval of the applicant's request and stated the applicant's NPSEB Addendum should be changed to show he enlisted for the critical MOS 92A and critical UIC WV59A0 so he may keep the bonus of $20,000 he already received. The evidence of record confirms the applicant initially enlisted in the CAARNG on 4 March 2008 for an NPSEB of $20,000 in the critical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009362

    Original file (20140009362.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was eligible for a $10,000 OAB due to his critical area of concentration (AOC) of 12B (Engineer) and completion of the Officer Basic Course. The applicant provides: * Request for documentation from the Incentives Task Force * Incentives Task Force Bonus Audit Form * ARNG Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) Guidance for Fiscal Year 2007, 1 January to 31 March 2007 (Policy Number 07-04) * Extension of ARNG SRIP Policy Number 07-04 to 15 June 2007 * List of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008156

    Original file (20140008156.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * the correct copy of the OAB Addendum was discovered after the denial of his exception to policy by the National Guard Bureau (NGB) * the incomplete addendum was initially provided in the Guard Incentive Management System for payment submission * the Officer Strength Manager, who also was the witnessing official, discovered the correct addendum * after the correct addendum was submitted, another discrepancy was discovered in relation to the area of concentration...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020949

    Original file (20130020949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He stated he had received the first installment of $5,000.00 on 17 June 2011 and that although the Bonus Addendum could not be located, the incentive was offered at the time of his commission. The applicant enlisted in the FLARNG on 21 August 2008. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and state ARNG records of the individual concerned be corrected to show: * the 20 March 2010, a Written Agreement – OAB Addendum, was properly prepared with a Bonus Control...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012718

    Original file (20130012718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Exception to policy denial memorandum * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) * Annex B (Enlisted Affiliation Bonus Addendum - ARNG) * DA Form 71 (Oath of Office - Military Personnel) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence in his records and he provides none to show he became qualified in this MOS. In the absence of additional documentary evidence that shows the applicant completed the required training and/or became MOS qualified in the MOS he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006959

    Original file (20130006959.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    With prior enlisted service in the North Carolina Army National Guard (NCARNG), the applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the NCARNG and executed an oaths of office on 15 July 2010. Additionally, the applicant signed his OAB addendum prior to his appointment date which is not in accordance with the SRIP guidance. The ARNG offers a $10,000.00 Officer Accession/Affiliation Bonus to newly-commissioned officers and newly-appointed warrant officers who agree to serve 6...