Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030417
Original file (20100030417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  28 July 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100030417 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show this award.

2.  The applicant states he served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman) from May to July 1969.

3.  The applicant provides two DD Forms 214, issued on 13 July 1969 and
14 May 1972.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant’s military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 
1 October 1968, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman), and he served in Vietnam as a rifleman in an infantry unit 2 months and 5 days.

3.  He immediately reenlisted on 14 July 1969 to change his MOS to equipment maintenance specialist.  He served a total of 1 year, 6 months and 4 days in Vietnam.

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 14 May 1972.  Neither
DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the CIB, there are no orders awarding him the CIB in his records, and there is no evidence that he served in active ground combat.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  Additionally, Appendix V of USARV 672-1 provides that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the applicant was assigned to an infantry unit, and he held an infantry MOS in Vietnam 2 months and 5 days, there is no evidence he served in active ground combat.

2.  Without evidence to show he served in active ground combat, there is insufficient evidence in which to award him the CIB.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  ___x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100030417



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100030417



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012874

    Original file (20060012874.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 8-6 of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. The applicant's records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the CIB; b. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for the qualifying period of 1 June 1971 through 31 May 1973; c. awarding the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011248

    Original file (20130011248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no evidence of record which shows he served in active ground combat. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the CIB. _____________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015748

    Original file (20060015748.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders authorizing the CIB in his records. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in three campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which is not correctly shown by award of three bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. Deleting the Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars and the entry "Expert (Rifle);" and c. Adding the Vietnam Service Medal with 3 bronze service stars, Combat Infantryman Badge, the Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013726

    Original file (20110013726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Service in a combat area and campaign participation credit alone do not support award of the CIB. Absent any evidence of record or independent evidence provided by the applicant to corroborate his personal participation in active ground combat during the just over 5 months he served in a qualifying infantry unit in an infantry MOS, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the CIB has not been satisfied...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012983

    Original file (20110012983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) 2. The applicant's infantry MOS and/or his service in Vietnam are not in question. In the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence such as operation reports, after action reports, valor awards, witness statements, or any other evidence that conclusively shows he actively participated in ground combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000966

    Original file (20100000966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * these awards do not appear on his DD Form 214 * his orders for the Bronze Star Medal is proof of eligibility for the CIB as it states he was involved in "ground operations against a hostile force" * his military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (infantry indirect fire crewman) is also evidence of combat for award of the Purple Heart * he sustained an injury in June 1970 3. The applicant provides: * Orders for the Bronze Star Medal * Letter, dated 30 July 2008, from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001354

    Original file (20140001354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that during the Vietnam Conflict, only enlisted Soldiers who held and served in an infantry unit in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H were eligible for award of the CIB. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was awarded the CIB. Therefore, in view of all of the foregoing, the available evidence is insufficient to support the applicant's request for correction of his records to show award of CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020927

    Original file (20110020927.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends he should be awarded the CIB and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award and the Purple Heart. The evidence of record shows he was assigned to 2 different infantry units during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. Awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), for the period 14 May 1969 through 22 March 1971; and c. Amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 by deleting the "Vietnam Service Medal" and adding the: * Combat Infantryman Badge * Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007721

    Original file (20080007721.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 does not show any additional awards. The evidence shows that the applicant held an infantry MOS and was assigned duties as an infantry indirect fire crewman, in MOS 11C and as a wheel vehicle mechanic, in MOS 63B, in an infantry unit; however, there is no evidence, and the applicant provided none to show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. There is also no evidence he served in active ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit as an infantryman while he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007790

    Original file (20120007790.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, there is no evidence of record that indicates he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB during his active duty service. Notwithstanding his sincerity and the apparent issuance of the CIB (1st Award) to him by TACOM, in the absence of official documentary evidence that conclusively shows he was personally present with a qualifying infantry unit when it was engaged in active ground...