Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030363
Original file (20100030363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  5 July 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100030363 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his reentry (RE) code be changed. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect:

   a.  He was punished for something he did in the civilian world, not on active duty.

   b.  His battalion sergeant major gave him his word that he would be deployed.

3.  In an undated letter, he states:

	a.  While in Iraq he developed appendicitis and became addicted to pain medication following surgery.  He was experiencing severe abdominal pain and the doctor told him there was a chance he might have nicked a nerve canal.  When he returned to the barracks he noticed his fellow Soldiers started ignoring him because he was not able to do his work and he endured a steady stream of anti-Semitic remarks because he is Jewish.

	b.  Every time he went to the hospital they sent him to a different doctor and each doctor kept giving him Percocet.  Soon he realized he was developing a dependency on pain pills.  He mentioned his concerns to his doctors and was ignored.  At that time he became depressed because he was not working and he was being mocked because he was a Jew. 


	c.  He started using steroids to get back in shape and he incorrectly injected the drugs and developed an abscess in his right thigh.  He had to have emergency surgery.  He requested substance abuse treatment and his requests were ignored.  He just gave up and sank into a deep depression.  He began smoking marijuana to ease his psychological pain.  

	d.  His brigade was to deploy to Iraq in April 2008.  He failed a drug urinalysis test and was given an Article 15.  He mentioned that he had been seeking help with his drug problem since his appendicitis operation.  He was enrolled in an informational substance abuse class.  He was still addicted to pain pills.  He spoke to his battalion sergeant major and told him all he wanted to do was get squared away to serve his country and do a good job.  His battalion sergeant major assured him that he was going to deploy.  However, he was subsequently told he was being kicked out of the Army. 

	e.  He understands he cannot blame his drug related problems on others as he is responsible for his behavior and no one can force him to take drugs but he will say he was overprescribed pain pills by Army doctors and he was ignored when he voiced concerns about addiction. 

4.  The applicant provides:

* Four letters of support
* Newspaper articles
* DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ)
* Correspondence from a Member of Congress 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  He was ordered to active duty for his last tour of active duty on 2 January 2008 from the Army National Guard.

2.  On 31 January 2008, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for using marijuana on 5 January 2008.

3.  The facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not available.  However, his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 28 April 2008 shows he was issued a general discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2) for misconduct (drug abuse).  He had completed a total of 
2 years, 9 months, and 19 days of creditable active service.


4.  Item 25 (Separation Authority) of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 
28 April 2008 shows the entry "AR [Army Regulation] 635-200, PARA [paragraph] 14-12C(2)."  Item 26 (Separation Code) of this DD Form 214 shows the entry "JKK."  Item 27 (Reentry Code) shows the entry "4."  Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of this DD Form 214 shows the entry "MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE)."

5.  He provided four letters of support from fellow Soldiers.  They attest the applicant is an exceptional Soldier with superior domain knowledge, he is professional, competent, dedicated, loyal, and motivated.

6.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment processing into the Regular Army, U.S. Army Reserve, and Army National Guard.  Chapter 3 prescribes basic eligibility for prior-service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of Armed Forces RE codes.

7.  RE-4 applies to persons separated from their last period of service with a non-waivable disqualification.

8.  RE-3 applies to persons who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation, but the disqualification is waivable.

9.  RE-1 applies to persons completing an initial term of active service who were fully qualified when last separated.

10.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, dated 15 June 2006, shows that Soldiers assigned an SPD of JKK will be assigned an RE code of 4.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record does not support his contention he was punished for something he did in the civilian world, not on active duty.  The evidence shows he was ordered to active duty on 2 January 2008 and he received NJP for using marijuana on 5 January 2008.       

2.  The letters of support submitted on behalf of the applicant fail to show that his RE code was unjust and should be changed.


3.  His RE code was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations at the time of separation.  There is no error in his records and he provides an insufficient reason that would justify changing his RE code.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x__  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100030363



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100030363



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2009-191

    Original file (2009-191.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ASB stated that if Coast Guard policy had any flexibility to allow retention of a member following a drug incident, the board would have recommended his reten- tion on active duty. The fact that the command later took action against the applicant after receiving evidence that he was accepting and filling prescriptions for opioid drugs without informing the prescribing physician of his addiction does not shock the Board’s sense of justice.7 The applicant alleged that his discharge was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004348

    Original file (20120004348.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further stated he was recommending the applicant be given a general discharge, under honorable conditions. The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), by reason of misconduct (drug abuse), with an SPD of JKK, RE code of 4, and a general discharge. It appears the separation authority took the applicant's complete military record into consideration when he directed the applicant received a general discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007963

    Original file (20120007963.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 April 2010, the applicant’s commander notified him of his intent to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separation – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 14, for the commission of a serious offense, based on his testing positive for methamphetamine use. Chapter 14 deals with separation for various types of misconduct, which includes drug abuse, and states individuals identified as drug abusers may be separated...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00038

    Original file (FD2005-00038.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. It was after I was caught using marijuana, that I began receiving medications fiom the clinic. He also said that it would be best not to pursue a medical discharge, which I went along with in part because I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006765

    Original file (20080006765.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 July 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080006765 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons. The regulation states the reason for discharge based on separation code “JKK” is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021204

    Original file (20120021204.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 June 2011, he was notified by his immediate commander that separation action was being initiated against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct - abuse of illegal drugs. The "JKK" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), by reason of misconduct - drug abuse. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record confirms...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110015053

    Original file (AR20110015053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: by an undated memorandum Discharge Received: Date: 110516 Chapter: 14-12c(2) AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse) RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: B Co, 2-5 Cav, 1 BCT, 1CD, Fort Hood, TX Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 110302, wrongful use of Marijuana (101205-1110105), reduced to E-2, 45-day extra duty and restriction, (FG) Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021350

    Original file (20090021350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge and change of his reentry eligibility (RE) code to one which would allow him to reenter the Army. The applicant's platoon sergeant told him that he was recommending nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and separation from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090016320

    Original file (AR20090016320.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense for wrongfully used, possessed and transferred valium on divers occasions (060701-060801), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011602

    Original file (20060011602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On that same day, the applicant's commander recommended that he be separated from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct-commission of a serious offence, prior to his ETS date. The applicant's separation code of "JKK" is consistent with the basis for his separation and the RE Code applied to his DD Form 214 is consistent with the separation code; therefore, the applicant is not entitled to a change of his separation code or...