Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029714
Original file (20100029714.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	16 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100029714


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal.

2.  The applicant states that people were busy transitioning out of Vietnam and the award was overlooked and not included on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides copies of an Army Commendation Medal Certificate and his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 May 1967.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 68D (Aircraft Powertrain Repairman).

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

	a.  item 38 (Record of Assignments) that he was assigned in Vietnam to the 150th Transportation Detachment from 28 November 1967 to 14 November 1968 and he returned to Vietnam and was assigned to the 330th Transportation Company from 17 August 1969 to on or about 15 April 1970;

	b.  item 38 that he had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings;

	c.  item 39 (Campaigns) that he participated in the Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III, Tet Counter Offensive, and a 7th unnamed campaign.

	d.  item 41 (Awards and Decorations) that he was awarded or authorized the:

* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge
* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Vietnam Campaign Medal

4.  On 21 April 1970, he was honorably released from active duty as a specialist five/E-5.  He completed 2 years and 11 months of active service during this period.

5.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Vietnam Campaign Medal 

6.  His records contain the following orders:

	a.  Special Orders Number 212, U.S. Army Transportation School, Fort Eustis, VA, dated 31 October 1967, show he was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.

	b.  General Orders Number 2700, Headquarters, 1st Aviation Brigade, dated 25 April 1970, show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service from August 1969 to May 1970.

7.  A review of the applicant's records indicates entitlement to additional awards and decorations that are not shown on his DD Form 214.

8.  Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the regulatory guidance for the Vietnam Service Medal.  It states that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in.  A silver service star is authorized in lieu of five bronze service stars.  Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, participation credit was awarded for the following seven campaigns:

* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III
* Tet Counteroffensive 
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase IV
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VI
* Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969
* Vietnam Winter-Spring 1970

10.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows that units to which the applicant was assigned were cited as follows:

	a.  the 150th Transportation Detachment for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 27 March 1967-17 May 1968 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 21, dated 1969, as amended by DAGO Number 46, dated 1969; and

	b.  the 330th Transportation Company for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation (Army) for the period 1 November 1968-31 January 1970 by DAGO Number 51, dated 1971, and for the period 1 February 1970-31 July 1971 by DAGO Number 5, dated 1973.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  General orders awarded the applicant the Army Commendation Medal.
 
2.  The applicant's records show he distinguished himself in the performance of his military service as evidenced by his "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and honorable character of service.  There is no record of a conviction by a court-martial or other evidence of disqualification.  Therefore, it is presumed that his not receiving an Army Good Conduct Medal for his service was an oversight.  Accordingly, he should be awarded this medal.

3.  Special orders awarded him the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.

4.  Records show he participated in seven campaigns during his service in Vietnam.  Therefore, he is entitled to one silver and two bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.

5.  His units in Vietnam were cited for two awards of the Meritorious Unit Commendation (Army) and one award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during his period of assignment.

6.  The above awards should be noted on his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

___x_____  ___x_____  _x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ____ ____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 22 May 1967 to 21 April 1970,

	b.  deleting from item 13 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal, and

	c.  adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 the:

* Army Commendation Medal
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Vietnam Service Medal with one silver and two bronze service stars
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Meritorious Unit Commendation (Army) (2nd Award)



      __________x_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000026



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100029714	



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019063

    Original file (20100019063.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. deleting from item 30 of his DD Form 214 the entry "RVN - 3 Sep 67 - 25 Sep 78," c. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016228

    Original file (20140016228.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 indicates overseas service but does not show he served in Vietnam. Although it was not until March 1972 that change number 15 to Army Regulation 635-5 authorized an entry on the DD Form 214 to indicate Indochina and Korea service on or after 5 August 1964, there is no harm in adding his service in the RVN during the period 7 May 1967 through 3 December 1968 to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013866

    Original file (20130013866.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending on 10 March 1970 to: * show his date of birth (DOB) as 1947 * add the Bronze Star Medal (2nd Award) 2. GO awarded him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) during the period of his enlisted service; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Forms 214 for the period ending on 10 March 1967 and 10 March 1970 to add this award. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014360

    Original file (20110014360.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show the applicant serve during a qualifying period for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and participated in four campaign periods during his service in the RVN. Records show the applicant's unit was cited in general orders for award of the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during his period of assignment. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding in Item 24 of his DD Form 214 the: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015621

    Original file (20060015621.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to correction of his records to show the award of the Purple Heart. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the: a. AGCM first award for the period 24 July 1967 to 1 March 1970, Air Medal Fourth Award with "V" Device, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, Aircraft Crewman...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000340

    Original file (20110000340.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 41 does not show award of a Silver Star, second Bronze Star Medal, second Purple Heart, or the Army Commendation Medal and his official military personnel file does not contain orders awarding him any of these awards. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026646

    Original file (20100026646.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * He was to receive the Army Good Conduct Medal from Headquarters and Company A, 709th Maintenance Battalion, 9th Infantry for his year of service with them during the Vietnam War * He participated in the Akron, Coronado, Emporia, and Great Bend campaigns in Vietnam from June 1967 through March 1968 * The 9th Infantry Division was heavily involved in the Tet offensive during February and March 1968 * It was a hectic time in the jungle and delta * They were told their...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005912

    Original file (20110005912.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 5 June 1967 through 4 February 1970; c. adding to item 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012609

    Original file (20120012609.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Thus, there is insufficient evidence to correct of his records to show this badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. issuing an appropriate document showing he had honorable active duty service from 16 October 1963 through 1 April 1965; b. deleting from item 24 of his 15 November 1971 DD Form 214 the "Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017100

    Original file (20130017100.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Later regulations required the inclusive dates of service in Vietnam; therefore, it would be appropriate to show his service in Vietnam in Item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 January 1969. The applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal and he served in Vietnam during five campaigns; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 January 1969 to show this award with one silver service star. As a result, the Board recommends...