Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029305
Original file (20100029305.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100029305 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add any and all medals he and his unit were awarded for service in Germany.  He specifically requests to be awarded a "machine gun badge." [Interpreted to mean a marksmanship qualification badge for the machine gun.]

2.  The applicant states his awards were "left off" of his DD Form 214 upon leaving Germany and the Army.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* National Personnel Record Center letter dated 23 March 2007
* DD Form 47 (Record of Induction)
* Acknowledgement of Service Obligation
* Discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve
* DA Form 3054 (Election of Amount, Beneficiary Designation and Settlement Options for Servicemen's Group Life Insurance)
* Special Orders Number 174
* DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)





CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army on 24 September 1965.  He completed training as a light weapons infantryman.  He arrived in Germany on 3 April 1966 and was assigned to Company A, 1st Battalion, 15th Infantry.

3.  On 3 September 1967, the applicant departed Germany en-route to the U.S.  He was released from active duty on 6 September 1967 as an overseas returnee.  The DD Form 214 he received shows the following awards:

* Army Good Conduct Medal
* National Defense Service Medal
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) governs preparation of the DD Form 214.  This regulation provides that item 24 of the DD Form 214 will reflect decorations, medals, badges, citations and campaign ribbons awarded or authorized for all periods of service. 

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) sets forth requirements for award of basic marksmanship qualification badges.  The qualification badge is awarded to indicate the degree – Expert, Sharpshooter, and Marksman -- in which an individual has qualified in a prescribed record course.  An appropriate bar is furnished to denote each weapon with which the individual has qualified.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been noted.

2.  There is no evidence in the available records nor has the applicant submitted any evidence showing that he qualified with the machine gun for award of a marksmanship badge.

3.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  __X_____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100029305



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100029305



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011289

    Original file (20120011289.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This form further shows he was awarded the: * Army Good Conduct Medal (5th Award) * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960 * Vietnam Service Medal * National Defense Service Medal (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) 13. Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending on 26 February 1969 should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020088

    Original file (20140020088.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his service record should show his service in Vietnam. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), the National Defense Service Medal; and c. Item 30 does not show he served in Vietnam; however, it shows he served in USAREUR from 28 July 1961 to 15 July 1964; USARPAC from 30 September 1965 to 1 September 1966; and USAREUR from 30 November 1967 to 26 November 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005258

    Original file (20140005258.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 December 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140005258 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests reconsideration of his request for correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: a. he completed Unit Administration training in Germany in December 1967; and b. was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14). An award for previous marksmanship weapons...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003785

    Original file (20110003785.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his marksmanship badges. e. On 14 June 1992, he was given permission to accept and wear this foreign marksmanship qualification badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 13 of his DD Form 214 the Army Achievement Medal, and b. adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 the: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010905

    Original file (20110010905.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * he was qualified as an Expert Marksman in all weapons * two awards of the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) 2. The available records do not show the applicant qualified as an expert with any weapon other than the M-60 Machine Gun or that the unit to which he was assigned was awarded two PUCs. Paragraph 1-31c(11) states an award for previous...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010693

    Original file (20110010693.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add all medals to which he is entitled, in effect, those listed as verified by the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) which, in addition to those already shown on his DD Form 214, include: * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) * Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar * Ranger Tab 2. The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004037

    Original file (20120004037.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the training and qualifications received during his military service should be recorded on his DD Form 214. Therefore, item 25 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this training. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) to item 24 of his DD Form 214 and b. adding the entry "Advanced Individual Training,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021305

    Original file (20110021305.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant further states that the award of the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar is omitted from his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant’s service records do not contain orders awarding him the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar. The applicant’s request for the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar was carefully considered and it was determined there is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012360

    Original file (20100012360.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by issuing him a correction to his DD Form 214 adding: * CIB * Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar (M-60) * Marksman Marksmanship...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021620

    Original file (20140021620.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records do not contain any evidence that shows he qualified with or was awarded weapons qualification badges for the M-16 rifle or .50 caliber and M-60 machine guns. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: A thorough review of the applicant's official military personnel record shows no evidence of special orders that announced award of additional weapons qualification badges nor were there entries on his DA Form 20 to indicate he qualified with the M-16 rifle or the .50 caliber and M-60 machine...