Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029004
Original file (20100029004.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100029004 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his Reentry (RE) Eligibility code of 4 be changed to a more favorable RE code to allow him to return to active duty.  

2.  He states he:

* has turned his life around and has stopped using cocaine to get through struggles
* made a lot of idiotic decisions when he was in the Army
* was going through a lot of family-related issues when he first arrived at Fort Bragg, NC 

3.  He provides no additional documents.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 February 2008.  

3.  He was discharged on 25 August 2009 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  He completed 1 year, 5 months, and 29 days of active military service.  

4.  His DD Form 214 shows he was assigned an RE code of 4 and a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of "KFS" (In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial).  

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt.  Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation shows that the separation program designator “KFS” as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214 specifies the narrative reason for discharge as “In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial” and that the authority for discharge under this separation program designator is 
“AR 635-200, chapter 10."  

7.  Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table), Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes RE code 4 as the proper reentry code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  Table 3-1 includes a list of the RA RE codes:
	a.  RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army.  They are qualified for enlistment if all other criteria are met.

	b.  RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification is waivable.  They are ineligible unless a waiver is granted. 

	c.  RE-4 applies to Soldiers who are separated from their last period of service with a nonwaivable disqualification.  They are ineligible for enlistment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions in regard to his drug use and family-related issued are acknowledged.  However, these issues are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief in this case.  

2.  His request that his RE code of "4" be changed so that he may reenter the military was considered; however, it does not serve as a basis to change a properly-assigned RE code regardless of the Army’s current enlistment policies.

3.  His RE code is based on his narrative reason for separation and cannot be changed unless the applicant's narrative reason for separation is changed.  His narrative reason for separation was based on his voluntary request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial and there is no basis upon which this reason should be changed.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting relief to the applicant in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  __X_____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100029004





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100029004



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020210

    Original file (20090020210.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was discharged on 14 November 2007 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. The regulation states the reason for discharge based on separation code "KFS" is "in lieu of trial by court-martial" and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009562

    Original file (20110009562.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 20 October 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110009562 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his record to show reentry (RE) code 3. The evidence of record does not show, nor has he provided evidence showing error in the RE code he was assigned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018347

    Original file (20080018347.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table provides that when an individual is assigned a SPD code of "KFS" with a narrative reason for separation of “in lieu of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009920

    Original file (20100009920.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 10 August 2006, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011190

    Original file (20080011190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080011190 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He further understood that there is no automatic upgrading or review by any Government agency of a less than honorable discharge and that he must apply to the Army Discharge Review Board or the Army Board of Correction of Military Records if he wished review of his discharge. On 19 April 2007, the approving authority approved the applicant's request and directed the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011092

    Original file (20080011092.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The SPD code of KFS was the appropriate code for the applicant based upon the guidance provided in Army Regulation 635-5-1 for Soldiers separating under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005678

    Original file (20140005678.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 February 2007, the applicant was separated for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. He received an under other than honorable conditions discharge under the provisions of Army Regulations 635-200, chapter 10 and was assigned a separation code of KFS and an RE code of 4. On 15 May 2013, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request to upgrade his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011364

    Original file (20130011364.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: * an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions to an honorable discharge * correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his character of service as honorable and his reentry eligibility (RE) code as 1 2. Following consultation with legal counsel, he requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090316C070212

    Original file (2003090316C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 June 1999, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. On 19 October 1999, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed an UOTHC discharge. The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested, and therefore, it would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009712

    Original file (20090009712.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, his RE Code will not allow enlistment. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The applicant's military service records show that he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial and acknowledged guilt of the charges against him.