Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028832
Original file (20100028832.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  28 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100028832 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests item 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected.  He also requests a copy of his medical records. 

2.  The applicant states:

* he was issued a DD Form 214 without showing what type of discharge he received
* he needs his character of service corrected on his DD Form 214 for entitlement to benefits

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 October 1980 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 94B (food service specialist).  On 25 March 1982, he was released from custody and control of the Army due to misconduct (fraudulent entry).

3.  Item 23 (Type of Separation) of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "RELEASE FROM CUSTODY & CONTROL."  Item 24 shows the entry "NA" [Not applicable]. 

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The regulation states an authorized entry for enlisted personnel in item 23 is "Release from custody and control of the Army."  The regulation also states the entry "Not applicable" (for release from custody and control of the Army due to void or voided enlistments) is an authorized entry for item 24 of the DD Form 214. 

5.  The ABCMR is not the custodian of medical records.  The applicant may request a copy of his medical records by submitting a request via a letter or the Standard Form (SF) 180 (Request Pertaining to Military Records) to the following address: National Personnel Records Center, ATTN:  Army Reference Branch, 9700 Page Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63132-5100.  The SF 180 can be found at http://www.archives.gov.  This portion of his request will not be discussed further in these proceedings.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  He wants his character of service corrected on his DD Form 214.  

2.  The governing regulation states the entry "NA" will be shown in item 24 of the DD Form 214 for enlisted personnel released from custody and control of the Army.  The applicant was released from custody and control of the Army due to misconduct (fraudulent entry).  Therefore, there is no basis for granting his request. 






BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028832





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028832



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015384

    Original file (20090015384.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A memorandum, dated 18 October 1979, directing the applicant's release from the custody of the Army under the provisions of chapter 14, section II, of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel) by reason of fraudulent enlistment (concealment of conviction by civil court); and b. However, his records contain a memorandum, signed by the approval authority; a discharge order; and a properly-constituted DD Form 214 that show he was released from the custody of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018402

    Original file (20110018402.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 August 1978, the separation authority, a major general, approved the commander's recommendation to void the applicant's enlistment under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-5a(1). This regulation further states when service is voided a DD Form 214 will be prepared and distributed on all individuals released from custody and control due to void service, to include voidance due to fraudulent enlistment. Therefore, his record of service on his DD Form 214 is correct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012297

    Original file (20100012297.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 June 1978, the separation authority ordered the applicant's enlistment voided in accordance with paragraph 14-5a of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel) and the applicant's release from military control by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) of this form shows the entry "00 00 00," item 24 (Character of Service) shows the entry "NA" (not applicable), and item 26 (Separation Code) shows the entry "YKG." The version...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017771

    Original file (20140017771.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record contains a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that shows he enlisted in the U.S. Air Force on 26 December 1978 and was honorably discharged by reason of an involuntary discharge – erroneous entry on 11 April 1980. He also stated he had previously served in the Air Force and was discharged for medical reasons (mental). The evidence of record shows that his chain of command took the appropriate action and determined the applicant had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020529

    Original file (20130020529 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chapter 14 established policy and prescribed procedures for processing fraudulent entry cases and provided for the administrative disposition of enlisted personnel for misconduct by reason of fraudulent entry into the service. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), as then in effect, prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. The regulation in effect at the time showed that SPD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000736

    Original file (20150000736.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) as follows: * Item 9a (Type of Separation), from “Release from Military Control” to Discharged * Item 9c (Authority and Reason), from paragraph 14-15a, Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel) and Separation Program Designator (SPD) YKG, should be deleted * Item 9e (Character of Service) from “Not Applicable” to Honorable 2. On 23 January 1979, the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006798

    Original file (20130006798.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was honorably discharged on 12 December 1979. On 4 December 1979, the separation authority ordered the applicant's enlistment voided in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-5a, and the applicant's release from military control by reason of fraudulent enlistment. c. Chapter 14, in effect at that time, established policy and prescribed procedures for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010641

    Original file (20120010641.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not submit any evidence that shows his release from service was unjust and that his service should have been characterized. __________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001779

    Original file (20140001779.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he was honorably discharged on 16 November 1977. It further stated that the applicant's request for immediate enlistment had been considered. His complete separation packet is not available for review and the available documentation does not show the basis for the determination that his entry on active duty was fraudulent.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010409

    Original file (20130010409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 June 1976, the separation authority ordered the applicant's enlistment voided in accordance with chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 and the applicant's release from military control by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at that time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The version of the regulation in effect at the time stated that for a Soldier being released from the custody and control of the Army due to a...