Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028822
Original file (20100028822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100028822 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Combat Action Badge.

2.  He states he:

* doesn’t have the Combat Infantryman Badge or the Combat Action Badge on his discharge document
* was in an infantry unit
* was a tank driver as well as a tank gunner in Vietnam from approximately February 1968 to February 1969
* was actively involved in combat in Vietnam

3.  He provides:

* DD Form 214
* DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214)
* Discharge orders from the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement)
* DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)
* DD Form 47 (Record of Induction)



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 8 September 1967.  

3.  His DA Form 20 shows in:

* Item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties (MOSs) – he was awarded MOS 11E2O (Armor Crewman) on 2 February 1968
* Item 31 (Foreign Service) – he served in Vietnam from 2 March 1968 through 26 February 1969
* Item 38 (Record of Assignments) – he was assigned to Troop B, 1st Squadron, 10th Cavalry, 4th Infantry Division in Vietnam on 16 March 1968 as a loader in duty MOS 11E; doesn’t show he served as an infantryman or held an infantry MOS
* Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) – doesn’t list award of the Combat Infantryman Badge or the Combat Action Badge

4.  His service record doesn’t contain orders which show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge or the Combat Action Badge.  

5.  He was released from active duty on 5 September 1969.  His DD Form 214 doesn’t show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge or the Combat Action Badge.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the requirements for award of the Combat Action Badge are branch and MOS immaterial.  Assignment to a combat arms unit or a unit organized to conduct close or offensive combat operations or performing offensive combat operations is not required to qualify for the Combat Action Badge.  Award of the Combat Action Badge is authorized from 18 September 2001 to a date to be determined.  Award for qualifying service in any previous conflict is not authorized.  Retroactive awards of the Combat Action Badge are not authorized prior to 18 September 2001.   

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows he served as a loader in duty MOS 11E while assigned to Troop B, 1st Squadron, 10th Cavalry, 4th Infantry Division during his tour in Vietnam.  

2.  To support award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, he is required to have been an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties while assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit engaged in active ground combat and he must have actively participated in such ground combat.  Therefore, he does not meet the requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

3.  Award of the Combat Action Badge is authorized from 18 September 2001 to a date to be determined.  Award for qualifying service in any previous conflict is not authorized.  Retroactive awards of the Combat Action Badge are not authorized prior to 18 September 2001.  The applicant served on active duty from 8 September 1967 to 5 September 1969.  Therefore, he does not meet the minimum eligibility criteria for award of the Combat Action Badge.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028822





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028822



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001354

    Original file (20140001354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that during the Vietnam Conflict, only enlisted Soldiers who held and served in an infantry unit in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H were eligible for award of the CIB. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was awarded the CIB. Therefore, in view of all of the foregoing, the available evidence is insufficient to support the applicant's request for correction of his records to show award of CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004597

    Original file (20090004597.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. Records also show that prior to assignment to the Republic of Vietnam his PMOS of 11B was withdrawn and he was awarded PMOS of 11E. Although the applicant argues that he was not trained in MOS 11E, evidence of record shows he performed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016748

    Original file (20100016748.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he was advised in a letter from the Chief, Military Awards Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), Alexandria, Virginia, that his records would have to be corrected by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to show he held MOS 11D for him to be eligible for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. There is no evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006538

    Original file (20110006538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The fellow Soldier attests: * he served with the applicant in the Army at Fort Hood, TX, and in Vietnam * he and the applicant served in Troop C, 1st Squadron, 1st Cavalry, 1st Armored Division, at Fort Hood, TX, from approximately January 1967 until their deployment to Vietnam in August 1967 * the applicant functioned and served in the capacity of an armored intelligence specialist in MOS 11D * cavalry troopers assigned to armored cavalry assault vehicles (ACAV's) carried MOS 11B (Light...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009693

    Original file (20080009693.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 October 1968 for a period of 3 years. The Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (formerly known as the Total Army Personnel Command) has advised, in similar cases, that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H. In the absence of evidence, which shows the applicant was awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007247C070208

    Original file (20040007247C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 05 APRIL 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040007247 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Jeanette McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007125

    Original file (20120007125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the: * Purple Heart * Combat Infantryman Badge 2. Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. However, there is no evidence he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007790

    Original file (20120007790.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, there is no evidence of record that indicates he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB during his active duty service. Notwithstanding his sincerity and the apparent issuance of the CIB (1st Award) to him by TACOM, in the absence of official documentary evidence that conclusively shows he was personally present with a qualifying infantry unit when it was engaged in active ground...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104514C070208

    Original file (2004104514C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows that he served in the RVN from 26 December 1968 through 17 December 1969. However, by regulation, in order to qualify for the CIB, in addition to serving in combat with a qualifying unit, an enlisted soldier must have held an infantry MOS, which according to Army HRC awards officials included MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G AND 11H. The evidence of record shows the applicant held and served in MOS 11E, performing duties as an armor...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002047

    Original file (20140002047.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of: * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) * All other awards he is authorized 2. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that...