Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028730
Original file (20100028730.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100028730 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests approval of his Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) claim.

2.  The applicant states that he applied for CRSC benefits and his request was denied.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his CRSC application and a copy of his Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Rating Decision.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s records, though somewhat incomplete, show he was serving in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in pay grade E-4 when he was mobilized in support of Operation Enduring Freedom at Fort Eustis, VA.

2.  On 27 March 2004 while in Newport News, VA he was involved in an altercation where he was stabbed and sustained lacerations to the right side of the head, left arm, right hand, and the right side of the chest.

3.  On 23 October 2007 the applicant was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with a 40 percent (%) disability rating percentage.

4.  He was removed from the TDRL on 16 June 2009 and he was permanently retired on 17 June 2009 with a 60% disability rating.

5.  On 22 September 2009, the applicant applied for CRSC for the following conditions:

* Chest Wall defect, obstructive lung disease
* Eczema, tinea Versicolor
* Eczema, Pseudofolliculitis
* Labyrinthitis, vertigo
* Status Post Stab Wound Right 3rd and 4th finger
* Migraine Headaches, Post-Concussion Headaches
* Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
* Scars, Scars Right Anterior Chest
* Traumatic Brain Disease

6.  On 19 July 2010, the CRSC Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (USAHRC) denied the applicant’s claim due to a lack of evidence to show that his conditions were combat-related.

7.  On 24 August 2010, the DVA granted the applicant a 100% service-connected disability rating, effective 24 November 2008.

8.  The applicant again applied for CRSC benefits and his claim was again denied for the same reasons.  The CRSC Branch could not determine based on the available evidence that his conditions were combat-related.

9.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1413a (CRSC) provides that eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  Such disabilities must be compensated by the DVA and rated at least 10% disabling.  For periods before 1 January 2004, members had to have disabilities for which they were awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10% disabled or who are rated at least 60% disabled as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or cause by an instrumentality of war.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence provided by the applicant, and the available evidence of record, fails to support his contention that his conditions are combat-related.

2.  The available records contain no evidence to show that he deployed to a combat theater or any related evidence to show any involvement in combat operations.  He has failed to show that his conditions were the result of specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.

3.  Therefore, in the absence of such evidence there appears to be no basis to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028730



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028730



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017427

    Original file (20140017427.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested the ABCMR reconsider his previous request and provided a document entitled Combat Action Badge Information. When a Solder has been awarded a Combat Action Badge, it may help make a determination for CRSC but only if that person is later diagnosed with PTSD as a direct result of the incident for which the award was given. Second, other veterans, those who were awarded CRSC, first had conditions that were rated by VA with a 10% or greater disability rating, and then...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016241

    Original file (20090016241.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). For periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute was amended), members had to have disabilities for which they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10-percent disabled or who are rated at least 60-percent disabled as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Without evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006358C070206

    Original file (20050006358C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Thus, one Gulf War veteran presenting with difficult-to-diagnose symptoms could be diagnosed with chronic fatigue syndrome, which cannot be service-connected under this law because it is a diagnosis. While the applicant has five disabilities which have been classified as Gulf War incurred, there is no evidence or indication that those...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017531

    Original file (20110017531.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests to be granted combat-related special compensation (CRSC). He requests payment of CRSC for this disability because he served in combat in Vietnam and his VA medical record indicates, "The presumption that this condition is related to his time in Vietnam has been established through the VA Compensation and Pension Service endorsed by the Veterans Board of Appeals (VBA)."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011901

    Original file (20140011901.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of his medical records and CRSC claim. He was also informed that documentation he submitted failed to provide evidence to link his requested conditions to a combat-related event and the disapproval is now considered final. There is no evidence to show his skin condition(s) for which he is receiving service-connected compensation is related to or was caused while participating in hazardous duty, in training that simulated war, in a combat-related event, or in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009553

    Original file (20060009553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. (a disease of bone marrow that is characterized by the presence of numerous myelomas in various bones of the body). Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001038C070206

    Original file (20050001038C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Jeanette R. McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities for eczema and nasal swelling be approved for Combat- Related Special Compensation (CRSC). As stated above, the CRSC criteria is specifically for those military retirees who have combat related disabilities.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001038C070206

    Original file (20050001038C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities for eczema and nasal swelling be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). As stated above, the CRSC criteria is specifically for those military retirees who have combat related disabilities.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003543C070206

    Original file (20050003543C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Richard T. Dunbar | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability compensation, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in conditions simulating combat (which includes hazardous duties), are eligible for CRSC. In view of the preceding conclusions, there is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003774

    Original file (20130003774.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides: * a self-authored statement, dated 13 February 2013 * his DA Form 199 (PEB Proceedings), convened on 2 March 2010 * his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision, dated 8 December 2011 * a letter from U.S. Army human Resources Command (HRC) CRSC Branch, dated 13 December 2012 * two letters of support, dated 12 July and 27 August 2012 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years...