Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028699
Original file (20100028699.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100028699 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICNAT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an adjustment to his date of rank (DOR) for captain from 31 August 2010 to 16 July 2009, or to the effective date of the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) Orders, dated 24 March 2010.

2.  The applicant states he met the minimum time in grade for promotion to captain on 16 July 2009 and had been in a commanding position since 
14 February 2009.  He submitted all of his documentation as soon as he met the minimum requirements for promotion to captain.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his command orders and his promotion orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military records show he was appointed in the PRARNG as a second lieutenant, effective 16 August 2005.  He was promoted to first lieutenant effective 16 July 2007.

2.  Based on the required completion of 2 years of minimum time in grade, his promotion eligibility date (PED) for captain was 16 July 2009.

3.  On 17 February 2009, the applicant was placed in a captain position in accordance with PRARNG Orders Number 048-501.

4.  On 4 March 2010, the applicant appeared before a Federal Recognition Examining Board (FRB).

5.  On 24 March 2010, the PRARNG issued Orders Number 083-520 promoting the applicant to captain with an effective date of 24 March 2010.

6.  On 31 August 2010, the applicant was Federally Recognized as a captain.

7.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was provided by the Acting Chief, Personnel Policy Division, NGB, on 9 August 2011.  The advisory official reiterated the applicant's request.  The official stated the applicant was promoted to captain by the PRARNG on 24 March 2010 in accordance with Orders Number 083-520, dated 24 March 2010.  The applicant was Federally Recognized in the higher rank effective 31 August 2010.  

8.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14308, paragraph (f) states that "the effective date of a promotion of a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army who is extended Federal recognition in the next higher grade in the ARNG under section 307 or 310 of Title 10 shall be the date on which such Federal recognition in that grade is so extended."  Also, in accordance with the Reserve Officer Promotion AC, section 1-2, "the effective date of promotion and DOR of an officer who is promoted under the position vacancy system will be the date the Chief, NBG, extends Federal recognition."

9.  On 10 August 2011, the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  He did not respond.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In view of the circumstances in this case, the applicant is not entitled to an adjustment of his DOR for captain from 31 August 2010 to 16 July 2009, or to 
24 March 2010.

2.  The NGB issued orders Federally Recognizing and promoting him to captain with a DOR and effective date of 31 August 2010.  This is the earliest DOR for which he was eligible.

3.  In view of the evidence, it is concluded the applicant was promoted to captain and Federally Recognized with the earliest DOR he was eligible, in a timely manner, and he has not shown otherwise.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting this request.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028699



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028699



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000045

    Original file (20120000045.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DOR should be adjusted due to the State G-1's failure to submit his Federal Recognition 90 days prior to the Army Promotion List (APL) mandatory promotion board. m. On 2 November 2010, the FY 2011 Captain APL Board convened and recommended him for promotion to captain on a published list, dated 3 March 2011. n. Based on law, regulation, and NGB policy, his PRARNG unit should have proceeded with the promotion process when he was selected for promotion by the vacancy promotion board. (5)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022677

    Original file (20120022677.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * correction of the date he was granted Federal recognition from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) * consideration by a mandatory promotion board under the fiscal year 2012 (FY12) criteria 2. The applicant states: * he was promoted to captain (CPT) on 15 August 2005 and reached his maximum years of service (7 years) for promotion consideration to major (MAJ) in August 2012 * his promotion packet was not submitted on time due...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012924

    Original file (20110012924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The letter indicated that he was considered and selected for promotion to CPT by an SSB that convened on 4 October 2010 and that his promotion eligibility date would be 6 August 2011. Chapter 8 of this regulation states a commissioned officer must complete the required minimum years of promotion service prior to being considered for promotion and Federal recognition in the higher grade. The regulation states ARNG officers will be considered for promotion by mandatory promotion boards, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016374

    Original file (20130016374.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Had his subsequent delinquent OER been completed in a timely fashion, he would have been promoted after 26 August 2010. c. On 22 March 2010, he emailed his battalion commander, battalion executive officer, and battalion S-3 in reference to his promotion to captain. The applicant provides: * email correspondence * promotion packet, dated May 2010 * OER for the period 1 March 2009 through 28 February 2010 * DA mandatory promotion board notification * OER for the period 1 March 2010 through 16...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028471

    Original file (20100028471.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The official stated the applicant was promoted to captain by the TXARNG on 20 May 2010 per order number 145-1064, dated 25 May 2010. The advisory official also stated the applicant contends that he was eligible for promotion to captain on 22 April 2010. The applicant was not eligible for promotion to captain until 22 April 2010.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000099

    Original file (20110000099.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She provides: * her OCS Diploma * her appointment memorandum, dated 12 March 2009 * a DA Form 71 (Oath of Office - Military Personnel), dated 12 March 2009 * a National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board (FREB)), dated 26 May 2010 * an NGB 337 (Oaths of Office), dated 25 June 2010 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military records show she was appointed in the PRARNG as a second lieutenant (2LT), effective 12 March 2009, and extended...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024507

    Original file (20100024507.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 April 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100024507 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The orders stated the effective date (pay) of promotion would be the date NGB extended Federal recognition of the State promotion. The regulation states ARNG officers will be considered for promotion by mandatory promotion boards, and promotion to CPT required completion of 4 years of maximum time in grade as a 1LT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012468

    Original file (20100012468.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This official indicated the following: a. the applicant was fully qualified for promotion to CPT on the October 2008 board; b. the applicant’s promotion to CPT was not completed until 18 March 2010 due to administrative errors made during the processing of his promotion due to a mismatch in his assignment as a chaplain; c. during the NGB’s processing of the applicant’s Federal recognition on 17 February 2010, it was discovered that the applicant was erroneously assigned to a medical position...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017252

    Original file (20100017252.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was originally appointed as a warrant officer on 22 September 2007. Absent any evidence that the PRARNG intended to promote the applicant or took steps to promote him prior to 20 November 2009, there is no basis to recommend approval. However, there is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he was recommended for promotion to CW2 on the date of his eligibility.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017700

    Original file (20080017700.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy of an earlier Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) letter, dated 4 September 2008, in support of his request. On 3 May 2007, in response to the applicant’s petition, dated 21 August 2006, to the ABCMR to adjust his DOR to MAJ from 16 August 2006 to 24 September 2003, the ABCMR rendered a favorable decision and recommended the applicant’s records be corrected by amending Federal Recognition Special Orders Number 209 AR, dated 16 August 2006, to...