Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028571
Original file (20100028571.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  23 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100028571 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her military records to show her rank as sergeant, pay grade E-5.

2.  The applicant states her rank should be changed from corporal, pay grade 
E-4 to sergeant, pay grade E-5.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her promotion orders, dated 30 September 2009.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Order 273-15, 41st Fires Brigade, Fort Hood, Texas, dated 30 September 2009, as provided by the applicant and on file in her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), states in essence that the:

	a.  applicant was promoted to sergeant in military occupational specialty (MOS) 94P2O00YY (Multiple Launch Rocket Repairer);

	b.  promotion was effective 1 October 2009;

	c.  promotion was not valid and the order would be revoked if the applicant was not in a promotable status on the effective date of the promotion; and

	d.  applicant's MOS of 94P1O00YY was to be withdrawn.
2.  The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows she:

	a.  enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 April 2004;

	b.  attained pay grade E-4 on 1 February 2008;

	c.  held MOS 94P1O at the time of release from active duty; and

	d.  was released from active duty on 10 November 2009, in the rank of corporal, pay grade E-4.

3.  Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) provides the criteria for promotion to sergeant, pay grade E-5.  The applicant must have met the following criteria:

	a.  reenlistment or extension eligible;

	b.  considered physically qualified;

	c.  have a current Army physical fitness test qualifying score;

	d.  not be enrolled (self referral) in the Army Substance Abuse Program;

	e.  not be flagged for disciplinary reasons; and

	f.  meet the time in service remaining requirement.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends her military records should be corrected to show she was released from active duty in the rank of sergeant, pay grade E-5.

2.  The available evidence contains copies of orders indicating she was promoted to sergeant, pay grade E-5, effective 1 October 2009.  This order directed that the promotion was effective if the Soldier was in a promotable status on the effective date.

3.  The available evidence is insufficient to determine what the applicant's promotion status was on 1 October 2009.


4.  Only 40 days after the promotion effective date, the applicant was voluntarily released as a corporal from active duty due to completion of her required active duty service.  This is suggestive that she may not have met all of the promotion criteria.

5.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ x  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028571



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028571



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013642

    Original file (20100013642.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The 814th AG Company Unit Manning Report prepared on 5 November 2008 shows she was assigned to the position of Chief Human Resources Sergeant (position number 0020) in the rank of 1SG in MOS 42A5O on 22 August 2007. b. SFC S____ of the USAR 143rd Expeditionary Sustainment Command (ESC) emailed several individuals, including the applicant indicating the applicant had been recommended [i.e., selected] for promotion to SGM against a position at her unit, the 814th AG Company. c. 1SG B____ [the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015542

    Original file (20090015542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides, in support of her application, copies of her memorandum submitted through the Commander, USARIEM; a statement from a sergeant; her college transcripts; her certificate for Medical Technologist (MT); a letter, dated 21 October 2008, from USARIEM; an SFS Form 29-E-R (Recommendation for Student Action); two pages from her application for enlistment; 3 pages from her enlistment contract; her orders, dated 2 June 2003, for transfer to the Medical Command Europe Replacement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019751

    Original file (20120019751.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * a memorandum from her previous unit commander, recommending she receive 150 duty performance points for her battalion's June 2010 semi-centralized promotion board * the supporting documentation that substantiates her promotion board administrative points * a memorandum from the President of the Board, Headquarters, Special Troops Battalion, I Corps, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA, dated 2 June 2010, subject: Promotion Board Proceedings for Promotion to SGT and Staff...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002194

    Original file (20110002194.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show she was retired as a sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4. Her DD Form 214 currently shows she was retired due to temporary disability in the rank/pay grade of SPC/E-4 with an effective date of promotion of 22 October 2003. In view of the foregoing, the applicant is entitled to correction to her DD Form 214 to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 with an effective date and date of rank of 10 November 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016814

    Original file (20110016814.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reinstatement to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and correction of her records to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 with a date of rank (DOR) of September 2004. The DD Form 214 she was issued for this period of service shows her rank as SGT and DOR as 1 February 2002. d. Based on the above, recommend that: * All documents in the applicant's file from 1 February 2002 to 23 November 2004 reflecting the rank of SGT be amended to reflect the rank of PFC * The Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024543

    Original file (20100024543.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests to be reinstated to the rank of sergeant major (SGM)/pay grade E-9 with an effective date of 15 October 2008. The promotion orders were processed on 29 January 2009; therefore, the promotion was erroneous. Furthermore, the applicant was not the first Soldier on the list.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010757

    Original file (20060010757.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, she is entitled to correction of her DD Form 214, Item 4a to show the rank, SGT; Item 4b to show the pay grade E-5; and a correction to Item 12h to show the date of effective date of pay grade, 2004/09/01 (1 September 2004). As a result, the Board recommends that the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the rank Sergeant, in Item 4a. ; and effective date of pay grade of 2004/09/01 (1 September 2004) in Item 12h., of the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024351

    Original file (20100024351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Headquarters, USARC Orders 09-072-00007, dated 13 March 2009, promoted her to sergeant major in MOS 42A with an effective date of 15 January 2009. In her request she stated a MSG at USARC stated she wasn't the only SGM whose promotion orders were revoked. USARC stated the applicant's promotion board was from 16 - 20 January 2007.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025637

    Original file (20100025637.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following in support of her request: a. numerous documents specifically related to her promotion case, including: * a 15 November 2009 letter from her company commander stating her MOS was 21U and she was assigned and deployed in an MOS 21U position * another 15 November 2009 letter from her company commander stating that MOS 21U had recently been re-designated as MOS 21Y and the applicant was in an MOS 21Y position * a DA Form 3355 (Promotion Point Worksheet),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023158

    Original file (20110023158.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * her E-8 promotion packet was submitted in January 2007 which resulted in her name being published on the permanent promotion recommended list (PPRL) in February 2007 * in April 2007, a promotion notice was sent to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) with a retroactive date of 1 January 2007 * she requested promotion orders from the orders publishing authority, but she never received promotion orders * she exhausted all due diligence researching promotion...