Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028532
Original file (20100028532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 August 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100028532 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests consideration by a Department of the Army (DA) Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion to captain (CPT).

2.  The applicant states he was selected for promotion to CPT in 1994.  During the same period, he transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) without being promoted and he was subsequently omitted from later boards.  

3.  The applicant provides:

* three emails from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC)
* three DA Forms 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Report)
* his Reserve Commissioned Officer Promotion memorandum
* a three-page self-authored rebuttal to the HRC advisory opinion

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was appointed as a second lieutenant in the Infantry with the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 15 August 1987.  On 14 August 1990, he was promoted to first lieutenant (1LT).

2.  While serving in the ARNG, the applicant was selected for promotion by the Calendar Year (CY) 1994 CPT DA Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB).

3.  On 1 March 1994, the applicant was honorably separated from the Army National Guard and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement).  On 27 April 1999, he was honorably discharged from the USAR.

4.  On 5 February 2010, the applicant was appointed as a 1LT, USAR, in the Military Police Corps.  He was ordered to active duty as a member of his reserve unit on 31 March 2011 for a period of 400 days in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.

5.  On 28 April 2011, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Special Actions Branch, DA Promotions, HRC, Fort Knox, KY.  The advisory official recommended disapproval of the applicant's request and stated that his transfer to the IRR on 1 March 1994 was prior to the approval of the board; therefore, he was not promoted by the ARNG.  The applicant was subsequently identified to the 1995 board, but he was deleted from consideration due to his previous selection.  The deletion was in accordance with Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers), paragraph 2-5, which states that while on a promotion list resulting from a prior mandatory promotion board, an officer may not be considered for promotion by a subsequent mandatory promotion board.  Upon transfer to the IRR the promotion authority transferred to HRC, St. Louis.  The DA Promotions Branch was not aware of the applicant’s transfer and the applicant never inquired about his status; thereby, he was not promoted.  The applicant remained on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) in a promotable status until he was discharged on 27 April 1999.

6.  On 3 May 2011, the advisory opinion was furnished to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  The applicant responded on 6 June 2011.  In his response he stated he was not promoted to CPT due to poor records management and a lack of personnel accountability by the HRC Promotions Branch.  

7.  Army Regulation 135-155 provides policy and procedures for the promotion of commissioned officers of the Army Reserve.  It states that for promotion from 1LT to CPT, the minimum number of years in the lower grade is 2 years and the maximum number of years in the lower grade is 5 years.  

8.  Army Regulation 135-155 specifies that promotion reconsideration by a special selection board may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error which existed in the records at the time of consideration.  Material error in this context is one or more errors of such a nature that, in the judgment of the reviewing official (or body), it caused an individual’s non-selection by a promotion board and, that had such error(s) been corrected at the time the individual was considered, a reasonable chance would have resulted that the individual would have been recommended for promotion. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Reconsideration by an SSB is authorized when an eligible officer is erroneously not considered for promotion by the regularly scheduled RCSB or when a material error exists in the record that is reviewed by the RCSB.  The applicant’s contention that he should be reconsidered for promotion by an SSB has been carefully considered and found to have merit.

2.  The applicant was appropriately considered for promotion by the 1994 RCSB and there is no evidence that his record contained a material error.  The applicant was selected by the board for promotion but ultimately not promoted because he transferred to the IRR on 1 March 1994, prior to the approval of his selection by the board.

3.  Upon transfer to the IRR, the applicant remained on the RASL in an erroneous promotable status until discharged from the service on 27 April 1999.  He should have been promoted, at the latest, when he attained the maximum time in grade on 14 August 1995.

4.  Notwithstanding the advisory opinion provided by the Chief, Special Actions Branch, DA Promotions, the applicant was disadvantaged by the HRC Promotions Branch remaining unaware of his transfer to the IRR and subsequently excluding him from consideration for promotion while assigned to the IRR.  Therefore, in the interest of justice and equity, it would be appropriate to promote the applicant to CPT effective 14 August 1995.

BOARD VOTE:

_____X___  ___X____  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION




BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  promoting him to CPT effective 14 August 1995; and 

	b.  paying him all due back pay and allowances to which he is entitled as a result of this correction. 



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028532



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024926

    Original file (20100024926.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders C-09-521084, issued by HRC on 21 September 2005, releasing her from the USAR Control Group and reassigning her to the 77th RRC, Fort Totten, NY, effective 21 September 2005. b. DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record), dated 1 April 2011, showing the applicant was assigned to HHC, 77th RRC on 22 September 2005, in paragraph/line number 019/02, position title executive officer, and an authorized grade of O-3. The effective date of promotion and DOR will be the same as if the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016197

    Original file (20060016197.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This order shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant was promoted to the grade of rank of CPT, effective and with a DOR of 1 March 2005. The applicant adds, in effect, that the Reserve Support Command should be able to confirm another person was assigned as the MP Platoon Leader and that he was assigned as the Operations Officer (i.e., a captain's position) from 16 July 2001 through 9 February 2003. Chief, Office of Promotions, RC, USA HRC, St. Louis, Missouri, effect necessary action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004875

    Original file (20140004875.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests retroactive unit vacancy promotion to captain (CPT) in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) with back pay and allowances as well as retirement point credit. The applicant provides: * 2009 USAR Appointment memorandum * ARNG Retirement Points History Statement * Email exchange * BSN-STRAP Contract * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 62E (Application for Federal Recognition as an ARNG Officer or Warrant Officer and Appointment as a Reserve Commissioned Officer or Warrant Officer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006276

    Original file (20110006276.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was promoted to the rank of 1LT on 5 November 1992. In a rebuttal to the advisory opinion, dated 18 November 2011, he stated it is obvious he was passed over for promotion to CPT due to his time in the IRR. The evidence of record shows that due to an administrative error on the part of the Army the applicant was erroneously promoted to the rank of CPT on 4 December 2000.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016049

    Original file (20100016049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a result, documents were not available in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) for review by the 1994 and 1995 Department of the Army (DA) CPT Reserve Components Selection Boards (RCSB). He states he was selected by the 2010 CPT Promotion Board with the same documents in his 2010 board file that USA HRC presumes were reviewed in 1994 and 1995, with the exception of an additional unfavorable OER in 2009. The applicant contends that his records should be considered for promotion to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017487

    Original file (20080017487.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further states the record shows the applicant was considered and selected for promotion to CPT by the 1997 RCSB and was given a date of rank of 3 October 1998 as a TPU officer. Therefore, as recommended by HRC promotion officials, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice to refer the applicant's record to an SSB for consideration for promotion to CPT under the criteria of the 1994 (if otherwise eligible, given his 1 November 1994 REFRAD date) and 1995 promotion boards...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016564

    Original file (20090016564.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He concludes that a material error occurred in that his complete record was not available or properly submitted to the promotion board and that the board was unable to consider his evaluation reports and his civilian education records and that he should be entitled to a Special Selection Board (SSB). The memorandum also notified him that one of the many possible reasons for the non-selection may have been that his record, when reviewed by the board, did not reveal that he had completed the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012314

    Original file (20110012314.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was eligible for promotion to CPT but his academic transcripts were not reviewed despite sending three sets of those transcripts * he provided his transcripts through the chain of command and to the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) * he had served as a first lieutenant (1LT) for 5 years, 3 of which were command time, and he had solid officer evaluation reports (OER) * he out-processed from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in June 1998 * his non-select memorandum...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011090

    Original file (20090011090.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, while there is no basis upon which to authorize an adjustment of the applicant’s DOR at this time, the evidence of record confirms the applicant was erroneously omitted from promotion consideration by the FY 1994, 1995, and 1996 RCSBs, as confirmed in the HRC-St. Louis advisory opinion. If the SSB selects the applicant for promotion to CPT under an earlier criteria, her CPT promotion effective date and DOR should be adjusted accordingly. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002411

    Original file (20140002411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 June 2008, the Board adjudicated his case and granted him partial relief in that it recommended: * adjusting his DOR and effective date to 2LT to 29 May 1998 * adjusting his DOR and effective date to 1LT to 29 May 2000 * forwarding his records before an SSB for promotion consideration to CPT under the 2004 criteria 13. Nevertheless, the Board corrected his records and adjusted his DOR and effective date of appointment to 2LT as well as promotion to 1LT. He was neither eligible for,...