Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028515
Original file (20100028515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  28 July 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100028515 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he retired from the Army instead of showing he received a bad conduct discharge (BCD).

2.  The applicant states he became addicted to drugs but never received or was offered any medical or any other type of help from the military.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the following periods:

* 21 October 1976 through 18 October 1993
* 26 October 1976 through 6 July 1978
* 22 June 1972 through 19 July 1976

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 


has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  With prior enlisted service in the Regular Army (RA), the applicant reenlisted in the RA on 26 October 1976.  He remained on active duty through continuous reenlistments and extensions.  

3.  The applicant received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on 1 August 1980, for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 10 July until 14 July 1980.

4.  On 12 January 1990, the applicant was declared a non-graduate from the Advance Noncommissioned Officers Course (ANOC) for failure to successfully complete the Army Physical Fitness Test after two attempts.

5.  The applicant was barred from reenlistment on 19 April 1990, for failure to pay his debts and failure to pass ANOC.

6.  On 9 January 1992, the applicant received NJP for wrongfully using cocaine.

7.  On 3 April 1992, the applicant was convicted, pursuant to his plea, by a general court-martial, of wrongful use of cocaine.  He was sentenced to a BCD and reduction to pay grade E-1.

8.  On 12 May 1992, the convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged and except that portion of the sentence pertaining to a BCD, ordered the sentence executed.

9.  General Court-Martial Order Number 53, issued by Headquarters, 7th Infantry Division (Light), Fort Ord, CA, dated 20 July 1993, noting that the sentence had been finally affirmed, ordered the BCD executed.  

10.  On 18 October 1993, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 3, as a result of duly reviewed and affirmed general court-martial conviction.  He received a BCD and had completed over 20 years of creditable active service.

11.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 3 provides that a Soldier will be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial.  The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence duly executed.

12.  Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process.  In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction.  Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.  Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been noted.  However, there is no evidence in the available record showing he was addicted to drugs at the time of his discharge from the Army.

2.  There is no pattern or history of drug addiction shown in his official records.  There is also no evidence that the applicant ever complained of being addicted to drugs while he was in the Army and failed to be treated.  Even if the applicant had been addicted to illegal drugs it would not have been a valid defense to his court-martial charges.  Likewise, such an addiction would not have qualified him for a medical retirement.

3.  His records show he was discharged as a result of a duly approved and affirmed general court-martial conviction of wrongful use of cocaine.  There is no basis for amending his records to show he retired from the Army as appose to showing he was discharged and received a BCD.

4.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028515



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028515



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019161

    Original file (20140019161.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 May 1994, he was sentenced to forfeiture of all pay and allowance, confinement for 6 months, and a BCD. His discharge has followed him for almost 20 years. He was a model Soldier until his he became addicted to marijuana.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016779

    Original file (20120016779.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. His record is void of documentation showing the specific reason for his reduction. His conviction and sentence by general court-martial were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018639

    Original file (20110018639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 March 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110018639 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Finding: Guilty * On or between 23 May and 1 June 1992, wrongfully using cocaine Plea: Guilty. The applicant could have self-referred at any time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021583

    Original file (20100021583.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his dishonorable discharge to a general discharge. The conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted. The evidence of record shows the applicant was 19 years of age at the time of his enlistment and nearly 23 years of age at the time of committing his serious offenses.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019253

    Original file (20130019253 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that his court-martial order directed that all rights, privileges and property be restored to him after his confinement and he now desires an honorable discharge. On 22 December 1993, General Court-Martial Order Number 451 issued by the United States Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas set aside the finding of guilty of specification I of Charge II (failure to go to place of duty) and directed that all rights, privileges and property of which the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002622

    Original file (20080002622.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged on 1 June 1990 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 3, Section IV as a result of court-martial. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant a general discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026993

    Original file (20100026993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 July 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100026993 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. His record shows he was discharged with a BCD as a result of a duly reviewed and affirmed general court-martial conviction and he has provided no evidence to show the type of discharge he received was too harsh, erroneous, or unjust. Based on his overall record of service, he did not serve honorably.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016582

    Original file (20130016582.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 May 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130016582 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by a GCM and he received a BCD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011869

    Original file (20120011869.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 January 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120011869 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his previous request that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to a general or an honorable discharge. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterized the misconduct for which he was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023057

    Original file (20120023057.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged with a BCD on 17 May 1994. a. Thus, the applicant's contention that his second period of service was honorable is not supported by the evidence of record. ___________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.