Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028150
Original file (20100028150.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 July 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100028150 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add military occupational specialty (MOS) 61C2O (Watercraft Engineer) due to completion of on-the-job training.

2.  The applicant states he graduated from a 6-week course at the U.S. Naval Support Activity-Saigon Detachment Nhà Bè in March 1968 and served as a Riverine Patrol Boat (PBR) engineer on a combat patrol boat from December 1967 through August 1968.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and diploma for completion of a 6-week course in river patrol boat maintenance conducted by the U.S. Naval Support Activity-Saigon Detachment Nhà Bè, South Vietnam.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States in Louisville, Kentucky, on 2 September 1966.  He completed basic training at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, and advanced individual training as an amphibious engineer mechanic at Fort Story, Virginia, and was awarded primary MOS 61E1O.  He remained at Fort Story for his first duty assignment with the 558th Transportation Company (Marine Maintenance).  He was advanced to pay grade E-4 on 19 June 1967 in MOS 61E2O.

3.  On 26 September 1967, he was transferred to Vietnam for assignment to the 458th Transportation Company (PBR) – the first PBR unit in the Army – for duty as a senior amphibian engineer.

4.  On 11 June 1968, he was assigned as a marine engineer in MOS 61C2O in the same unit.

5.  He departed Vietnam on 21 August 1968 for Oakland Army Base, California, where he was honorably released from active duty on 23 August 1968 as an overseas returnee.  He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 22 days of active service.  Block 23a (Specialty Number and Title) of his DD Form 214 shows his primary MOS as "61E2O AMPHIB ENG MEC" [amphibious engineer mechanic].

6.  A review of the applicant's records failed to show any evidence he was awarded MOS 61C2O and the record is silent as to how he performed in that MOS during the 70 days he was assigned those duties.

7.  Army Regulation 350-1 (Army Training) in effect at the time, provided that formal training in MOS 61C1O was 9 weeks and 2 days in duration.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The regulation in effect at the time provided for the entry of only one specialty (MOS) on the DD Form 214.  Additionally, the DD Form 214 in effect at the time had space for only one entry.  Under today's standards individuals must hold an MOS for at least 1 year before it may be entered on the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although there is insufficient evidence to show the applicant was qualified for award of MOS 61C2O at the time (40 years ago), the regulation governing the preparation of the DD Form 214 only allowed one specialty to be entered on the DD Form 214.  Accordingly, his primary MOS was properly entered on the DD Form 214.

2.  Inasmuch as there is insufficient evidence to show he was fully qualified for award of MOS 61C2O at the time, there is no basis to award him the MOS at this time.  Even if there were evidence to support award of the MOS, there is no basis to add it to his DD Form 214.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028150



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028150



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002616

    Original file (20110002616.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant completed 1 year, 2 months, and 6 days of foreign service in USARPAC (RVN and Okinawa) from 8 February 1966 to 13 April 1967; however, his DD Form 214 shows 11 months and 17 days. He was assigned to the RVN from 8 February to 8 May 1966; therefore, it would be appropriate to enter his foreign service in the RVN in item 30 of his DD Form 214. Recording in item 30 of his DD Form 214 the entry "RVN SERVICE: 8 February 1966 - 8 May 1966."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083619C070215

    Original file (2002083619C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This document shows that the unit the applicant served with, 7th Support Battalion, 199th Light Infantry Brigade, was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class Unit Citation, for the period 12 December 1966 through 31 August 1970 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 51, dated 1971. There is no evidence and the applicant has provided none that he was recommended for award of a medal for the saving of lives, to include one of the medals that can...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019445

    Original file (20090019445.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows the applicant served as a clerk assigned to the 483rd Field Service Company and the 223rd Supply and Support Company during his assignment in Vietnam. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004119

    Original file (20140004119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 30 (Remarks) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show foreign service in Vietnam for 13 months instead of service in Thailand from 15 October 1966 to 28 September 1967. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 5 February 2014 * DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) * DA Form 20 (Enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004119

    Original file (20140004119 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 30 (Remarks) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show foreign service in Vietnam for 13 months instead of service in Thailand from 15 October 1966 to 28 September 1967. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 5 February 2014 * DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) * DA Form 20 (Enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009925

    Original file (20130009925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: * award of the Purple Heart for a combat wound in Vietnam in 1964 * award of the Purple Heart for a combat wound in Vietnam in 1969 * award of the Purple Heat for a punji stick combat injury in Vietnam * award of the Amphibious Landing Medal (i.e., the Arrowhead Device) 2. There are no medical records available. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014045C071029

    Original file (20060014045C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in Vietnam on or about 6 January 1967. The applicant provided a Headquarters, 168th Engineer Combat Battalion Operational Report for the quarterly period ending 30 April 1967 that shows the battalion participated in Operation Cedar Falls, during which operation the unit was responsible for jungle clearing, road repair, mine sweeping, tunnel destruction, and other combat engineer tasks, during the period 5 through 28...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015831

    Original file (20130015831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20120019586 on 30 May 2013. His new argument has been noted; however, there is no available evidence of record showing that the applicant was assigned or attached to the Forward Observer Team...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006869

    Original file (20100006869.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant served in Vietnam. The applicant provided a letter from Headquarters, United States Army Support Command, Thailand, dated 17 July 1968, which authorized the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) for all personnel serving in Thailand. However, there is no evidence of record and the applicant has provided no evidence which shows he served a period of qualifying service in Vietnam or that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002442C070205

    Original file (20060002442C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was assigned to Vietnam in duty MOS 12B20 as a combat engineer in September 1966. The applicant’s medical documents indicate he had an acute sprain to his right ankle; however, there is no evidence of record which verify that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending item 23a on his DD Form 214 to show the entry “12B30 Combat...