Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028080
Original file (20100028080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100028080 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge.

2.  The applicant states he had psychiatric and marital problems that impaired his ability to finish his contractual enlistment period.  He states that a third-party report shows that his intention for being absent without leave (AWOL) was to "avoid overseas movement and obtain discharge from service by any means available."  He states he was a "damn good Soldier" who made corporal in less than 12 months and he was up for sergeant in 15 months.

3.  The applicant does not provide any supporting documents with his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 November 1974 for a period of 4 years.  He completed his initial entry training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).  The highest rank/grade he attained was corporal (CPL)/E-4.

3.  The applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of
Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on 24 February 1975 for stealing a box of candy from the Army-Air Force Exchange Service Post Exchange.

4.  The charge sheet or the specific facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant's discharge proceedings under the provisions of Army Regulation
635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial are not contained in his available military record.  However, his record does contain a DA Form 3836 (Notice of Return of U.S. Army Member from Unauthorized Absence) that shows he was reported AWOL on 1 November 1976 (corrected to 5 October 1976) and he was dropped from the rolls of his organization on 5 November 1976.  He was subsequently apprehended by civilian authorities and returned to military control on 21 December 1976.

5.  On 14 February 1977, he underwent a mental status evaluation that concluded he had no significant mental illness, that he was mentally responsible, that he could distinguish right from wrong, that he was able to adhere to the right and that he had the mental capacity to understand and participate in board proceedings.  He met the retention standards of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), chapter 3.  He also indicated in item 8 (Statement of Examinees Present Health and Medications Currently Used) of his chapter 10 separation medical examination of his Standard Form 93 (Report of Medical History) the entry, "I am in good health."

6.  His record contains a duly-constituted DD Form 214 that shows he was discharged on 4 April 1977 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, with special program designator (SPD) JFS, which refers to a discharge for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial.  His DD Form 214 further shows he was issued an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate.  He completed 2 years, 1 month, and 18 days of total active service with 80 days of time lost from 5 October through
31 October 1976 and from 5 November through 27 December 1976.

7.  There is no evidence to show the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

8.  References:

	a.  The Manual for Courts-Martial Table of Maximum Punishments sets forth the maximum punishments for offenses chargeable under the UCMJ.  The maximum punishment for AWOL is a punitive discharge (dishonorable discharge or bad conduct discharge), confinement for 12 to 18 months, reduction to grade E-1, and a total forfeiture of all pay and allowances.

	b.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 provides that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt.  Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions was normally considered appropriate at the time.

	c.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

	d.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier's separation specifically allows such characterization.

	e.  Army Regulation 15-185 (ABCMR) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  The ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity deciding cases on the evidence of record.  It is not an investigative body.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.  


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant's chapter 10 discharge packet is not in the available for review, the presumption of administrative regularity must be applied.  The applicant failed to show that his record is in error or unjust.  He stated he had psychiatric problems, but this is not support by his own personal health statement or the mental status evaluation contained in his record.

2.  The applicant's record of service included 80 days of time lost.  His discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, indicates he voluntarily requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial, although the specific offense(s) are unknown.  Based on his record of indiscipline, the applicant's service clearly did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel.  His misconduct rendered his service unsatisfactory.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028080



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028080



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008437

    Original file (20140008437.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 May 1976, he was discharged accordingly under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge to general under honorable conditions was carefully considered; however, the evidence is insufficient to support his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011286

    Original file (20130011286.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge. The DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions and issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Chapter 10 of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007235

    Original file (20100007235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was medically evaluated on 15 July 1977 and found medically qualified for separation consideration under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel). The separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of court-martial on 25 August 1977 and directed issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 17...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006167

    Original file (20140006167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation from the Army with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. Further, his discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001839

    Original file (20120001839.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) he was issued at the time shows he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by a court-martial with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Discharges under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, are voluntary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005549

    Original file (20130005549.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. In his request for discharge, the applicant indicated he understood that by requesting discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charge against him or to a lesser included offense that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. There is no indication that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000908

    Original file (20150000908.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. In conjunction with the applicant's enlistment, he completed a Standard Form (SF) 93 (Report of Medical History), dated 21 September 1976, wherein he stated he was in good health. On 4 April 1979, the Army Discharge Review Board denied his request for an upgrade of his discharge and determined his discharge was both proper and equitable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007539

    Original file (20080007539.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 15 January 1979, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a voluntary request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations), chapter 10. The applicant's voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009068

    Original file (20140009068.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Following a period of honorable active service in the Army of the United States, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 November 1969. On 17 March 1976, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. In his request for discharge he indicated: * he was making this request of his own free will and he had not been...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019942

    Original file (20140019942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 March 1976, the separation authority approved his request for discharge in lieu of court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant's request for an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge was carefully considered; however, there was insufficient evidence to support his request. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction...