IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 26 May 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100028068
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of items 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).
2. The applicant states:
* in May 1968, he was told he was going to get promoted to staff sergeant/E-6
* he was wounded on 25 May 1968
* he retired and got E-5 pay all those years
* the telegrams state he was promoted to E-6
* he believes he should have gotten E-6 pay from 25 May 1968 to 1999 when he went on Department of Veterans Affairs disability
3. The applicant provides:
* Certificate of Retirement
* four Western Union telegrams
* DD Form 214
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 July 1966 for a period of 3 years. He served as a light weapons infantryman in Vietnam from 1 December 1967 until he was wounded in action on 25 May 1968 and transferred to the United States on 14 June 1968 for further medical treatment. On 6 March 1970, he was honorably retired in the rank of sergeant/E-5 by reason of permanent disability.
3. Item 5a of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "SGT" [sergeant]. Item 5b shows the entry "E-5." Item 6 (Date of Rank) shows the entry "23 April 1968."
4. Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was appointed to the temporary rank of sergeant/E-5 effective 23 April 1968.
5. No evidence shows he was promoted to staff sergeant/E-6 prior to 6 March 1970.
6. His AGPZ Form 977 (Date for Retired Pay) shows his retired grade is sergeant and the highest grade attained was sergeant.
7. He provided four Western Union telegrams, dated 1968, which show his rank as staff sergeant.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. He contends he was told he was going to be promoted to staff sergeant/E-6 and the telegrams state he was promoted to E-6.
2. His military records show he was appointed to the temporary rank of sergeant effective 23 April 1968, which is properly reflected in items 5a and 5b of his DD Form 214. Regrettably, in the absence of promotion orders to staff sergeant/E-6 the Western Union telegrams are not sufficient as a basis for amending items 5a and 5b of his DD Form 214.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ ___X____ ____X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
____________X____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100028068
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100028068
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021050
Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the Purple Heart (1st Award) for wounds sustained during hostile action and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002226
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * Promotion orders * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The regulation, in effect at the time provided that for Item 5a, enlisted personnel would enter the grade in which serving at time of separation, indicating whether permanent or temporary.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004441
That is why he was removed from jump status due to medical reasons and transferred to a non-airborne unit for the remainder of his time. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. In the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013730
The applicant requests, in effect, item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and item 5b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 9 February 1968 be corrected to show sergeant/E-5 instead of specialist four/E-4. In support of his claim, the applicant provided his DA Form 20 which shows his principal duty was "First Cook (E-5)" during the period 5 December 1967 to 8 February 1968 in item 38 (Record of Assignments). There...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020398
The applicant requests correction of item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and item 5b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show sergeant instead of specialist four. Special Orders Number 139, dated 13 June 1969, show the applicant's rank at the time of his separation was specialist four/E-4. In the absence of promotion orders to sergeant, there is insufficient evidence on which to amend items 5a and 5b of his DD Form 214.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009492
The applicant provides the following documents: * a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 February 1968 * a copy of Special Orders Number 13, dated 16 January 1968 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in item 30. c. Item 30 is used to complete entries too long for their respective blocks and/or as a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020072
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was laterally appointed/promoted to command sergeant major (CSM)/pay grade E-9. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 2 (Grade) - "SGM E9"; b. item 3 (Date of Rank) - "23 Nov 66" (i.e., 23 November 1966); c. item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties [MOS]) he was awarded primary MOS 13Z5O and secondary MOS 15E5O (Pershing Missile Crewman) on 23 November 1966; d. item 33 (Appointments and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006757
The applicant does not provide any evidence. Likewise, his records do not contain orders promoting or advancing him to the rank of SGT/E-5. With respect to promotion to the rank of SGT/E-5, the evidence of record shows that at the time of separation, 8 March 1971, the applicant held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025228
Special Orders Number 120, dated 30 April 1969, show he was promoted to the temporary grade of SSG. Items 5a and 5b, enter the rank/grade in which a member was serving at the time of separation with an indication if permanent or temporary; for example "SSG (T) (Staff Sergeant, Temporary), SGT (P)." However, Army regulations allow Soldiers serving in a temporary grade at the time of separation to have that temporary grade entered on the DD Form 214.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018875
Item 5a, of the applicant's DD Form 214, shows he was serving in the rank of Sergeant, on the date of his discharge. Item 5b, of the applicant's DD Form 214, shows he was serving in pay grade, E-5, on the date of his discharge. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request for a correction to his DD Form 214 to show he was discharged from active duty in the rank and pay grade, Staff Sergeant, E-6.