BOARD DATE: 19 May 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100028035
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests issuance of a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).
2. He states his record does not show the AGCM, and he believes it may be awarded for 1 year of faithful service during a time of war.
3. He provides copies of documents from his Army record provided to him by the National Personnel Records Center.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 6 August 1968. After completing initial entry training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman). On 7 June 1970, he was honorably released from active duty early to attend school. He completed 1 year, 10 months, and 2 days of total active service.
3. Item 38 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings with the exception of one "good" efficiency rating. He received the "good" efficiency rating while assigned to a training support brigade at Fort Benning, GA, where he was undergoing training as a Noncommissioned Officer Candidate.
4. His record is void of documentation showing he was the subject of any disciplinary actions or that he received a commander's disqualification for award of the AGCM.
5. His record is void of documentation showing he was awarded the AGCM.
6. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings. Service school efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 were not disqualifying. There must have been no convictions by a court-martial. However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
The record shows the applicant received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and one "good" efficiency rating while he was assigned to Fort Benning for training. Although it is not specifically listed as an "academic good," it is reasonable to presume that it was merely an oversight that it was not listed as such. He was not the subject of any disciplinary actions and there is no record of a commander's disqualification for award of the AGCM. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM based on completion of a qualifying period of active Federal service and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.
BOARD VOTE:
___x__ ___x_____ ___x_____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 6 August 1968 to 7 June 1970 and
b. issuing a DD Form 215 adding the AGCM (1st Award) to item 24 of his DD Form 214.
_______ _ x _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100028035
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100028035
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013803
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in Section 38 (Record of Assignments) that he received an academic Good efficiency rating while attending his initial entry training during the period 18 September 1970 to 10 June 1971. As a result, the applicants claim for the award of the AGCM is corroborated by the evidence of record and it would be appropriate to grant him this award for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 30 June 1970 through 19 June 1973...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023833
His records show that he received excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his record is void of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the AGCM. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018918
The applicants military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 January 1951. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record confirms the applicant completed 22 years, 4 months, and 12 day of continuous active military service, and was retired on 31 May 1973.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012334
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 June 1965 for a period of 3 years and training as a personnel specialist. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019631
The applicant states: * he served from 31 October 1963 to 4 April 1966 and was discharged without receiving any medals * his service records reflect "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at each duty station 3. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005589
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 31 (Foreign Service), he was credited with service in Vietnam from 12 December 1966 through 18 November 1967 * item 38 (Record of Assignments), he served in two units while in Vietnam * Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 3rd Squadron, 5th Cavalry Regiment, 9th Infantry Division, from 12 December 1966 to 16 April 1967 * Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 1st Squadron, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment, from 17 April to 17...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020606
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 20 March 1968 through 19 March 1971 and to add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the AGCM (1st...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001920
Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows he earned the following awards: * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) 8. Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000864
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014626
Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received a "Good" conduct and efficiency rating for the period 31 March to 26 May 1961 while in advanced individual training (AIT). His military record shows he had a "Good" conduct rating during the period 31 March 1961 to 26 May 1961 while in AIT, which a disqualifying factor for award of the AGCM for his entire period of service. Since he had no record of any disciplinary action or a...